The result was delete. While there were some comments left, no one felt sufficient strong enough to recommend that this be kept. The consensus is that it should be deleted. Should it meet the criteria for inclusion at a future date, it can be re-created PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notbale magazine. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. ttonyb (talk) 18:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwew (talk • contribs) 07:22, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]