The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus to delete. Notability is clearly somewhat borderline, and reasonable editors seem to disagree on exactly whether it crosses the line or not. Ultimately this is the kind of topic that does very little harm if the page is left up, so we'll err on the side of keeping it at this point. ~ mazca talk 02:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bevilo tutto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just noticed this article was was proposed to be deleted once before last. Bringing to AfD as notability seems thin. Curb Chain (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:PRESERVE and WP:PAGEDECIDE. Since the topic of drinking games is definitely notable, this content should be kept somewhere, as there's potential to be included with other similar games. I would suggest to merge it somewhere, but there's no likely target right now. In the future it could be merged with other games [1] to produce a viable article; therefore its content shouldn't be deleted. Diego (talk) 11:05, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (tc) 02:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:56, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.