The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There's a clear lack of consensus to do anything in particular here. A merge may be appropriate with some trimming - this can be undertaken through normal editing if agreed. ~ mazca ^talk 21:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Central Buses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Corporate entity that has no apparent notability. Doesn't appear to me to warrant an independent article. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 23:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No assertion of notability. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I added some references. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think those references would warrant a merge/redirect to West Midlands Passenger Transport Executive. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I don't see how this meets WP:COMPANY. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 17:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into West Midlands Passenger Transport Executive per Eastmain and Blanchardb.--PinkBull 05:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Eastmain. Article is too long to justify a merge. (Search for "Central Buses" in the target article to understand why.) Only options are keep or delete. I like the references and I think it's notable so I say keep. Chutznik (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.