The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dagwoods Sandwichs et Salades (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable restaurant chain. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:03, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:54, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is, for the record, the same topic as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagwoods — however, that discussion is eight years old, so I wouldn't speedy this on that basis, and just wanted to make sure people are aware that we've been down this road before. That said, this article is still not making a stronger claim of notability, or showing more solid sourcing — restaurant chains are not granted an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist, but must be reliably sourced well enough to clear WP:CORPDEPTH. There's just not enough meat (pun intended) here for a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 19:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- barely a directory listing, with no opportunity for improvement, per available sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. I would think after 8 years it may have more press (since the last deletion), but unfortunately has nothing that would help show notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CNMall41 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.