The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:55, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feras M. Freitekh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person involved in some press coverage of an event doesnt make that notable for a biographical article per WP:BLP1E MilborneOne (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - under the guidelines at WP:CRIMINAL, it is far too early to judge this crime as sufficiently notable to grant the criminal a page. If he and his crime are still being written on years from now, that'll be a different matter. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. WP:PSEUDObiography of one event/BIO1E. The article has one sentence about the person. Everything else is about the crash. A somewhat unusual apparent suicide, but no indication of continued RS interest beyond the October 12–14 news cycle. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete one event notability that is not enough to justify an article. Wikipedia is not a newspaper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.