The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. A Traintalk 20:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guangdong Loongon

[edit]
Guangdong Loongon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable toy company. The trademark dispute does not show notability by itself. DGG ( talk ) 03:35, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why does Wikipedia include these European and North American companies and exclude larger Chinese companies? I do not understand the reasoning for that, although maybe some Wikipedians have played with these smaller North American and European brands and thus have emotional affinity to them and that personal connection is lacking from this Chinese family of brands?

Also, this is not a trademark dispute as but rather an intellectual property dispute, Lepin took the full designs of the Lego sets in question. --Nipnop88 (talk) 12:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lastly the reason I created this article is that many people were confused about who was manufacturing Lepin and Xingbao. Some people were saying it was Meizi Model. see here, ". In a post on Facebook, there are images of a company called Xingbao (星堡) who is owned by Meizi Model (美致模型), which is the same company that owns LEPIN" But the manufacturer is actually Loongon. This is why Wikipedia exists - to clarify questions that confuse me and provide a reference so that when people talk about the multitude of Chinese brands of Lego clones they can get correct answers. Already someone is covertly editing the Loongon page to remove mentions of Xingbao here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guangdong_Loongon&diff=prev&oldid=788562340 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guangdong_Loongon&type=revision&diff=788562566&oldid=788562502 -- maybe this person could clarify the relationships between these subbrands? --Nipnop88 (talk) 12:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nipnop88 Any additional details you could include from Denmark's media (home land of Lego) ? Doidlodilalodaiodloadodolodiododoldidoldilodo (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 12:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles I found in the Dutch media:

--14:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nipnop88 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More