The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ^Complex/_Rational 20:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hanoi Medical University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies on a single primary source. Has had maintenance tags since 2008(!). Has promotional language. Perhaps a merge into Hanoi? Qcne (talk) 19:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Qcne (talk) 19:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Medicine, and Vietnam. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

same place as Hanoi University of Pharmacy PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 01:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - there should be sources in Vietnamese that could be translated. - Indefensible (talk) 07:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Searching for "Đại học Y Hà Nội" results in thousands and thousands of results. For example https://daibieunhandan.vn/giao-duc--y-te1/truong-dai-hoc-y-ha-noi-don-chao-1-349-tan-sinh-vien-trong-le-khai-giang-nam-hoc-moi-i344460/, https://viettimes.vn/truong-dai-hoc-y-ha-noi-khai-giang-nam-hoc-moi-trong-tam-la-chuyen-doi-so-quan-tri-hieu-qua-post170281.html, https://tuoitre.vn/diem-san-truong-dai-hoc-y-ha-noi-tu-19-23-5-diem-20230726215636475.htm. The subject is a century old and the leading medical school in Vietnam, it should easily meet on notability. - Indefensible (talk) 17:42, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. We generally keep state-accredited universities. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It does not appear that an adequate WP:BEFORE was done, and while I haven't thoroughly investigated the sourcing, it's pretty inconceivable that qualifying sources do not exist. The remedy for examples of systemic bias like this is improving the articles, not AfDing them. ((u|Sdkb)) ^talk 22:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.