The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. per WP:CSD#G11 criteria by admin Jimfbleak (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 17:25, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kukhareva London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that falls short of WP:ORG as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search shows me hits mainly in user generated sources which are unreliable. Celestina007 (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 08:31, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It is a typical British fashion brand article, but bigger, more informative and better organised than e. g. these smaller stub-looking ones that were kept and not deleted:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchant_Archive
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Naka
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornback_%26_Peel
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tricouni_(brand)
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weird_Fish
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henleys
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammond_%26_Co.
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_Umbrellas
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firetrap
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finery_(company) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vittalio (talk • contribs) 09:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, in these reliable sources you may see the mentions about this British brand. The thing is that the brand doesn't promote via SEO, that's why it is not in the Google search top:

• The Guardian. Five fashion designers working sustainably without the eco terminology
• Vogue. London Fashion Week
• Daily Mail. Watch your step! Model wearing wacky sky-high platform shoes takes a tumble in embarrassing London Fashion Week finale
• Italianist. Ekaterina Kukhareva
• The Telegraph. Why is the 1950s housewife making a comeback?
• Gemologue. GEM TALK WITH EKATERINA KUKHAREVA

The brand is quite famous in the London fashion industry, so you may see the references in the famous mass media stated above.

In addition, let's follow the Wikipedia rule Deletion is not cleanup and Wikipedia is a work in progress. The article looks fine. If there is a need to improve it - let's do it! --Vittalio (talk) 08:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.