The result was speedy keep -- Samir धर्म 06:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is non-notable. There are thousands of small villages in Russia, and most of them are historically or georgaphically insignificant. --GoOdCoNtEnT 23:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Advertisement for company that does not meet WP:CORP. Twenty-five unique Google hits for the term "MyNCRE". ... discospinster talk 00:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All these reasons stated clearly shows that this article does not meet WP:CORP. --Siva1979Talk to me 05:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Bacon, eggs and adspam. Opabinia regalis 00:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Week Delete - semi-Notable subject, badly written, but not that notable. --andrew 04:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete and redirect to Etagnières. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax I think. More substantiation in the article's talk page. studerby 00:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparent hoax See the articles talk page for more reasoning. studerby 00:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Teke (talk) 18:07, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits]; 6 of them, so it's hard to say this is a notable product... this is nonetheless a formatting nightmare, and I was almost about to tag it as nonsense. Delete (|-- UlTiMuS 00:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The result was delete. 1ne 22:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement. Would have WP:PROD'd but this article has a previous AfD closed as delete here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Kathmandu. The new article has references and pictures, but I don't think this qualifies as a notable eatery -- Samir धर्म 00:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is alot of information about the business on the site now and if you ask most people in the north west about the Great Kathmandu they will tell you of its importance. The detail contained with in is no different to most of the establishments listed on wikipedia and I for one have not heard of some of them either and feel they have less importance then this artical. if you check google the Great Kathmandu has over 900 hits and is one of the first to come up when you type nepalese and Didsbury. The fact that people have logged on just to comment about this deletion shows that they care enough about this artical. I have informed people at the AGM of the Yeti Assoc. The Yeti Assoc is a organisation that tries to promote Nepalese culture in the UK and the world. Expect to see more information added to the artical by its members and suporters. More Nepalese related articals will follow. Harbourcoat 11:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable, unsourced, advertised, drivel.-Kmaguir1 06:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete.--Andeh 09:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits]; about 2C, but only maybe 3 are relevant. Non-notable fancruft. (|-- UlTiMuS 01:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits] about 500. almost all of which are google video/myspace/angelfire/ other nonsense. Delete because it would be impossible to find reliable third-party sources, as well as failing WP:CORP (|-- UlTiMuS 01:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
1. The reason for deletion of the original article is biased because of the connotations of the name, as shown by references to its ambiguity and the quality of similarly named "sites".
2. You do not need to care about it. This article is not relevant to you. I mean "random website" proves it - it's the biggest national Irish teen website. It is worthy of an encyclopedia article because Wikipedia is universal, international site and the article is relevant to a lot of people. This is the problem. It is not relevant to you, therefore you don't care and you have the power to delete it (or to request its deletion ;) ) Jiei 01:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits], only 3. Fails WP:SOFTWARE, and probably WP:SPAM. (|-- UlTiMuS 01:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep & Major Clean up.--Andeh 14:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
pointless content and unencyclopedic Edtalk c E 01:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete.--Andeh 09:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable actor/musician. From the musician standpoint, fails WP:NMG. From the actor standpoint, there are no verifiable citations that he was in any films (including Nepalese films) and IMDB does not list him [1]. -- Samir धर्म 01:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits] basically one unique hit, the site itself, and the rest are irrelevant. Failing WP:WEB and WP:V since the only real source is the site itself. (|-- UlTiMuS 01:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is this A7? TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 01:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NN, WP:SPAM, WP:WEB. BBtec 02:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SPAM, WP:CORP, WP:NN. BBtec 02:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn company. BBtec 02:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn website, spam. BBtec 02:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deeleete zee fureeegn lungooege erteecle. --Xrblsnggt 02:30, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn company, Google7hits. BBtec 02:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. ZsinjTalk 00:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn company, google 0hits. BBtec 02:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, concensus says TV stations are notable by the fact they exist. Nuttah68 20:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
spam. BBtec 02:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:V, no sources for Tom Sroka. Only IMDB link for the movie 1861 was a movie made in 1911. Scottmsg 02:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This guy is real. I watched his movie at a film festival two weeks ago.
The result was request made at WP:PNT, if no response in 2 weeks, relist -- Samir धर्म 02:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense CSD removed twice already, hoping for a speedy here. (|-- UlTiMuS 02:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge and redirect to Daiko Group per later discussion. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn companies. BBtec 02:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete WP:CSD#A7 -- Samir धर्म 02:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn bio. BBtec 02:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. No thanks to vanity press, publishing a book no longer counts as an assertion of notability. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits] about 500. I would have CSD'd, but he is an author of some fad books or something that may be somehow notable. Nonetheless, looks like a failure of WP:BIO to me. (|-- UlTiMuS 02:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
spam BBtec 02:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete under A8 The JPStalk to me 11:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable annual magazine list. It's probably a copyvio to reproduce the whole list. PROD tag placed last week was removed without comment. Mikeblas 02:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non Notable person Cardigan3000 02:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:WEB and was created by the user Batchmates1, which suggests a vanity page. Crystallina 02:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Past or present students of Marion Cohen are requested not to state their personal opinions on her teaching abilities. Thank you. Tyrenius 06:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Relisting: the (previous AfD of 23 August 2006) was closed early with no consensus because the article had been deleted, but it was then recreated (albeit in a shortened form). The original citation by Friday read:
"Vanity page about an academic, full of stuff like "Cohen describes herself as "math prof / mathematician / poet / writer / classical pianist /thrift-shopper / mother / grandmother / scrabbler extraordinaire". Sure, a sucessfull career as an academic, but unless having a job euqals notability, there's not much of substance here. Sometimes I'd speedy stuff like this, but there's already been some talk page discussion so I figure it's best to give this one some discussion in case there's disagreement."
I'm neutral here. Espresso Addict 02:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits] almost all hits are ads/sales for the product. I call spamvertising. (|-- UlTiMuS 03:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete as simple re-creation of content previously discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ktulu's Kingdom. Uncle G 15:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable Internet forum. Fails WP:WEB and WP:V. --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete.--Andeh 09:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
copyvio and Spam. Van Ao 03:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
While a very good drummer, he doesn't really have any notability other than playing with Joe Satriani. He also seems to fail WP:Music. Justinmeister 03:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete; meets WP:CSD.—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 10:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed questionably by anon IP here, so AFDing. Delete per my original prod: non-notable site. 3 ghits. [Check Google hits] (|-- UlTiMuS 03:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are exactly right and if it is deleted, it will be back... everytime. so, mark for deletion all you want —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kshoaf (talk • contribs) .
I don't think we can win this one....though justin's idea IS worth a shot but perhaps the good folk of wikipedia should be more understanding and less rude to people who are simply trying to make an article—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kshoaf (talk • contribs) .
Also regarding the idea of creating the article every time it is deleted won't work because pages can be proetect against recreation if you try that. Its not going to work and if a page was a simple recration it would be speedy deleted much faster than this. Also for a bit of advice accusing people who are deleting an article that viloates Wikipedia rules of being rude will not help you case. --Edgelord 05:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. Mostly Rainy 04:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing that's not already on, or can't already be on, the album's page. --zenohockey 03:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"We've been banned in China because of the song Spies."
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
protologism. Only Ghits appear to be some music CD and misspellings of "sexual": [16] --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN bible camp. Daniel Case 03:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn MMORPG, no sources. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A novelist who isn't yet published, and whose "memoirs" are his only work. The article doesn't mention how long this 26 year old's memoirs are. Vanity? – ClockworkSoul 03:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism, not notable, conspiracy-cruft Edogy 03:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN local forum (doesn't even tell us where Kingwood is). Daniel Case 04:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC) Kingwood Texas is about 15 miles north of Houston on Highway 59— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.241.151.70 (talk • contribs) [reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Minor fictional character in Cambridge Latin Course series, not notable enough to warrant own article. A mention in the Cambridge Latin Course article seems sufficient. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Might be something notable in there or coming, but looks so far like vanispamcruftisement that fails WP:BIO. Daniel Case 04:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn blog, no claims for notability are made, no sources. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete, I'm calling it A1 -- Samir धर्म 07:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed by author, as expected. Neologism therefore delete. (|-- UlTiMuS 04:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
notability not asserted, vanity, source not germane, poss hoax delete per above Joan-of-arc 04:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions. Notability can be determined by: Multiple features in popular culture publications such as Vogue, GQ, Elle, FHM or national newspapers A large fan base, fan listing or '"cult" following' Seems to meet it to me. --EdWood 05:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)EdWood--EdWood 05:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
If Nobodies like Christine Dolce can have a wiki, why can't Matthew John? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.63.117.41 (talk • contribs) .
The result was speedy delete CSD A7 -- Samir धर्म 07:07, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No relevant Ghits. Notability seems to be asserted, but likely a hoax. Daniel Case 04:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I actually saw him perform at the Gypsy tea room in dallas. Hes only 13 and can drop some mad beats! No kidding.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2pacisthabest (talk • contribs) .
The result was speedy delete textbook CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:MUSIC not met TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 04:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement for a non-notable website, fails WP:WEB. Not that Alexa is an accurate reflection of notability, but since the article mentions it, the site only ranks 73,378 currently [27]. Poking around the web, I found posts like this: [28], indicating that the site is brand new, and "still in testing" (in addition to the article itself which indicates a beta release in July). Other Ghits: [29]. --AbsolutDan (talk) 05:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In addition, surch's alexa rating of 73K is a 3 MONTH average... todays total was 32K and our page views per user was higher than googles. So while we are new and our userbase is not that of the big3 it is growing and our users are consistent.
I hope this helps. --Surch 08:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Deville (Talk) 13:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant spam of a non-notable company. MER-C 05:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement for non-notable website that makes no assertion of notability per WP:WEB. Successfully prodded, but re-created. Does not qualify for CSD G4. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 05:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as copyvio —Quarl (talk) 2006-08-26 09:57Z
Pure POV spam/link spam. Leuko 06:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Please defer merge discussions to the article talk page. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is the mother of a poet, but I don't think that makes her notable herself per WP:BIO. Written by editor who appears to have the same last name, so probably WP:VAIN too. Leuko 06:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable band. Fails WP:BAND. Author removed CSD A7 after inserting unsourced claims of a large following at a couple of local colleges. Leuko 06:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:MUSIC. The only real assertion of notability is on the talk page: that they were 'featured' on BBC Radio 4's Women's Hour. Albums are listed on Amazon, but as limited availbaility, and I'm fairly sure it isn't a major label. Delete The JPStalk to me 23:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original research, unless sources are forthcoming (as per User:130.123.225.69). -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 02:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable website; 381 unique Ghits for "Silent lightning", most unrelated to the site; Alexa rating below 4.6 million. NawlinWiki 16:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as moved to appropriate mainspace name and userfied -- Samir धर्म 08:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why is this called MarcLevoy/Light field? The creator being named MarcLevoy is a pretty good idea why. Recommend deletion and moving information to Light field Lid 07:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is the first Wiki page I've ever written, so I created it as a subpage on my user page. After screwing up my courage, I moved it to Light field. Feel free to edit. User:MarcLevoy
The result was speedy redirect to Rake (poker). There's no need to have a 5-day discussion over someone's attempts at disruption. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Uncategorized article created following the removal of a redirect. [30] It has since been used for spam purposes, with one user continuously spamming web links into the article and ignoring 3RR. The relevant information already appears in the Rake (poker) article. Delete. Essexmutant 07:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC) Keep. Rake free poker is increasingly popular in online gaming. --Yakuman[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam with no declaration of notability. Wikipedia is not a directory. Essexmutant 07:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing in this article to suggest that the person is notable outside Big Brother. talk to JD wants e-mail 23:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unitedroad 12:11, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete nomination for a page which was speedy deleted back in May 06. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BSS Prefects. Not notable group of school prefects, and no notability asserted. I cannot see prevous version to know if this is the same version deleted (ie don't know if speedy applies). Propose that the page be deleted and protected from re-creation. Ohconfucius 07:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed deletion of this 22 year old reality show wannabe actress, with no other achievemnts to note. Ohconfucius 08:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD G7 requested by author. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List criteria is bizarre and pretty much useless. Could also be impossible to keep correctly updated. Lid 08:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete A8 copyvio < 48 h -- Samir धर्म 05:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[Check Google hits] maybe 15 applicable hits, all of which are either a variant of the official site, or myspace/geocities. Impossible to WP:V with WP:RS, fails WP:CORP as well. (|-- UlTiMuS 08:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Bobet 08:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a hoax. It was added by a user with essentially no other contributions. I can't find any hits on Google or Google Books that are not derived from Wikipedia. The source cited are 12 volumes of a book from 1892. I know a fair amount about Anglo-Scandinavian history of the period and I think I would have heard about someone who saved Canute's life twice. There was an Ulfcytel who fought at the Battle of Ashingdon - but he was on Edmund's side and he was killed in the battle. Haukur 08:40, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Originally up for speedy delete but speedy tag removed by new user whose single purpose was to seemingly remove the speedy tag and to claim the band was notable[31]. Falls under possible WP:Vanity and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Lid 08:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--excellent point about: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I have removed the two phrases (one in "intro", one in "near future"] that would entertain this complaint— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uchohan (talk • contribs)
The result was speedy delete in the spirit of CSD G3 - sneaky vandalism. The claim that Sumner Redstone has three children blatantly contradicts reliable sources such as [32], and there is absolutely no sign of "Redstone Investments Corporation" on the web, much less coverage on its status as a majority stakeholder in Yahoo!. If we allow this article to live its full five days on AfD, it'll be an unnecessary affront to Sumner himself and a dishonesty to our readers. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Biography about a non-existent person. Someone with all the accomplishments that this person would have achieved, should have many mentions on the web, this isn't the case.-- JoanneB 08:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete the perfect CSD A7 example. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 09:15, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this is the perfect stub - its certainly short. However, I can't establish notability and it is a likely autobiography. -- Solipsist 08:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy as A7 The JPStalk to me 11:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Claims to be notorious but name brings up a whole 2 google entries. Assertion of notability is brought into significant question due to this. Lid 09:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notability questioned; contested speedy. No vote. —Quarl (talk) 2006-08-26 09:49Z
The result was speedy delete all CSD G4/A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 10:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also up for deletion are the derivative pages:
Violates WP:Vanity, Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and is also non-notable Lid 10:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There's an assertion of notability in that it's growing rapidly, but it doesn't seem particularly notable to me BigHaz 10:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This an unnecessary page created by User:Deuterium due to his edits on the Foreign relations of Israel page being reverted. And for good reason. Along with Israeli Apartheid articles, it just another attempt to place anti-Israel bias on Wikipedia Evolver of Borg 11:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete by GIen. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 14:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was speedied, now returned to life. Basically WoWcruft BigHaz 11:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merged and deleted. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe this is just Wikipedia's cultural bias at work, but this guy really doesn't seem notable. He doesn't have an article on ja: and he gets barely 60 Ghits, many of which are wikimirrors. But I might be totally wrong, so I'm bringing it here for discussion. Soo 11:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable corporation, fails to satisfy WP:CORP.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Valrith (talk • contribs)
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original research, unverified, and unencyclopedic and full of stereotyping. I've just moved from the big smoke to an Australian rural area and I've yet to hear one "Crikey", "Blimey", "Fair Dinkum'" or "True Blue" on the street. Possibly already covered in the article on Culture of Australia. -- Longhair 11:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's quite funny really. As an Australian, I don't take offense to it. Rather, it's full of stereotypes that are just as easily found in Sydney city, as out in the bush. That, and it's not a nessecary, productive or useful article that should be found on wikipedia. Nebuchanezzar 12:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
proposed deletion due to apparent lack of assertion notability, and absence of notabilityOhconfucius 12:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep Deville (Talk) 14:00, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP. 1190 Ghits; only this one is actually a third party article about the company, and it is not exclusively about SCG. Other hits are either press releases, directory listings, or the company's own website. Mike Christie (talk) 12:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mr. Christie - thanks for doing a great job editing. But since you've looked at the contribution I've continued to add to it and feel that it actually does comply with WP:CORP which states that:
The criteria for companies and corporations requires that the company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations.
As you can see there are considerably more than just the third party article you noted. I just hadn't the time to finish adding everything - the contribution is only a few hours old. These are comparable to other companies that have been used for their justification. Here's a list:
Jamie@scgonline.net 13:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge.The original deletion comments asked for the deletion as too narrow a subject, and the last few keep comments state that the article has potential, but the rest of the comments are that it is currently too small. So, I'm merging and redirecting to List of birds on stamps, and if it is expanded, feel free to split it again. Titoxd(?!?) 23:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sure there's something wrong with this. Firstly, the page is very small, and secondly, there is not any piece of useful info there. " Birds on stamps is a very common theme in philately. Every country has produced some bird stamps. Often these are masterpieces of stamp design." - even a philatelist or an ornithologist wouldn't find anything of use here. However, this has quite some potential to be rescued and savoured. --Dangherous 12:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete, worthless. Nuttah68 21:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Keep due to rewrite by Celithemis. People who rescue articles from AfD deserve congratulations, thanks, and a little bit of honor. Captainktainer * Talk 00:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD G3. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 12:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense, and fiction ArtVandelay13 12:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advertisement according to your rules. i don't agree personally but I'm playing by the rules. Scottcabal 12:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not describe a rivalry, rather it recounts a specific incident already covered in more depth in Ethnicity and football. Unlike say, Argentina and England football rivalry, England and Spain do not have a rivalry of note. Oldelpaso 12:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
the subject does not appear particularly notable. He does, however, appear to work for a respected weekly local/community newspaper with a circulation of 71,000. Ohconfucius 12:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 16:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is weird. --Dangherous 12:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
anti-Sydney rant, original research/POV Deuterium 12:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Other articles similar to this one, such as Westies, should also be deleted. Slang terms to represent petty class, ethnic and political differences in Sydney do not need articles dedicated to them. Such an article will be based on biased sources (the primary source at the moment is from an online opinion column) and will also be succeptible to easy manipulation by those who want to discredit other groups. Article neutrality can't be claimed when the sources are opinionated.
I don't want to think about how poor an article on parochialism in my home city would be. michael talk 04:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This style of parochialism seems largely unique to Sydney and is well documented. --WikiCats 11:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for acknowledging that parochialism in Sydney exists. There's one blog to demonstrate usage. There are notable references such as the Macquarie Dictionary/Book of Slang and the Sydney Morning Herald publication. --WikiCats 13:09, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep Deville (Talk) 14:02, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
This article reads as a thinly veiled ad for what is currently an insignificant product on the Mac. Not every application needs or deserves a WP page. pbones 18:53, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The article does read like an advertisement, but after a rewrite I should be kept. AppZapper was reviewed by Macworld [37] a while ago and did get some coverage on other Mac related websites. I don't see why every app shouldn't deserve a page on Wikipedia, I mean, there articles on virtually every little detail, non-notable to some, in the Star Wars movies. A lot of small applications are covered in this encyclopedia, from open source commandline ones to commercial applications, and I think that's a good thing, in regard to completeness, as long as the articles don't read like an advertisement. mensch • t 21:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Star Wars is viewed and loved by tens of millions of fans. Random Mac applications are not. As for why every application -shouldn't- have a page, my answer would be that VersionTracker and MacUpdate handle this just fine, it's outside of WP's domain for all but the most notable applications (Photoshop, Office, etc.). pbones 06:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All this page has said since December 2005 is "The Arts Council of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County is the official arts council for Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA, and Forsyth County". Oh, and it has a picture and an external link. I'd like to AFD this under WP:N, but also because it has nothing of value. I mean, what else is "Arts Council of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County" going to be? In its present state it is deserved to be flushed out of the English Wikipedia. Go ahead and expand if you wish. --Dangherous 12:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is nothing less than an advertisement for the organization mentioned within. Statements like:
...are nothing but advertisement! Hence the article should be deleted from this encyclopedia.
((advertisement)) tag was added to the page about two days ago. The author has not responded so far.
--Raanoo 06:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:53, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 00:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been previously proposed for deletion.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
None notable wrestling (where people pretend to be wrestlers), thus vanity. Englishrose 23:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. --- GIen 19:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE due to the lack of infromation and interest, this page should be deleted. MgHoneyBee 03:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable person. I certainly have nothing against User:Joe n bloe, but I don't think this belongs in an encyclopedia. This is the second time this article has been nominated. For review, please see the first nomination. Also note the user history of the user who recreated the page. Ktdreyer 22:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Cf. Mark Jason Dominus whose page was nominated twice. (He's a friend of mine whose position in the Perl community is I think fairly comparable.) You guys can do what you want, but I have about 25,000 Google hits, a (very well known and consistently very well reviewed) book, 2 years of articles in .login;, other national publications, and a personal history in the 1970s (unrelated to Perl obviously) that made me known to probably 10-25% of the US population at one time or another. I don't know the person who put the page back but people will continue to do so IMO. If you vote to "keep" I will fix it so that it's accurate. As far as WP:BIO goes it meets: "Published authors, editors and photographers who received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work" and (for print and video coverage from about 1975-1977 of my history as a child prodigy and survivor of acute lymphocytic leukemia) "Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events / The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person." For example 1975 interview on ABC Evening News, August 1976 Reader's Digest article entitled "Prodigy from Plumtree", Visit to the White House (page 4), Reference to appearance on Tom Synder's late night Tomorrow Show. I don't know who User:Ktdreyer is but I've never heard of him and this is one of only two or three articles he's proposed (re-proposed this time) for deletion. Joseph N Hall 23:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC); updated Joseph N Hall 01:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC); URLs Joseph N Hall 01:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've submitted this page for deletion as I can't see that it has anything to do with an encyclopedia. There are dozens of website on the net that have lists of anagrams and that is where this page belongs - on a personal website or a blog entry, IMO not wikipedia.
If anyone wants to restructure it in some radical way, great, but all I see is a list of randomly chosen anagrams, many of which are original research and have no base on the web. Mglovesfun 19:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy close. Templates for deletion is around the corner. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pointless template Brad Blaze 02:29, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect (Liberatore, 2006). 12:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reason the page should be deleted Gulivar 11:45, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, does not seem to be even close to meeting WP:MUSIC Deville (Talk) 14:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This subject of this page is not notable under wikipedia guidelines. Qrc2006 20:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
support per above Qrc2006 20:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only two pages listed, which now disambiguate directly to each other. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 13:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Deletion is not an option here, even the nominator is not intending to delete this. If you want to discuss redirecting or not redirecting, Talk:Trillion (and/or the talk page of the proposed redirection target) is the proper place. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
R. Koot keeps changing this to a redirect without discussion. I think we should reach a consensus about what to do with this article. I don't think redirecting to names of large numbers is right, as most links to trillion want information about the actual number, not the name of it. Also is much interesting information about the number and other thirteen-digit numbers here. Wii gok 13:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article presumably authored by one of the creators, Beast Megatron (talk • contribs). Was tagged for notability; tag removed without comment. Wikipedia tops the Google hits, which proves that this is effective as WP:SPAM if nothing else; gets 7 unique ghits of 69 total. No references cited and the Google results including nothing that could be construed as a reliable source. Fails to demonstrate notability per WP:WEB; fails to meet WP:V; presumably WP:SPAM and/or WP:VAIN. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
problematical article per WP:AUTO and WP:V. The article is about a French journalist photographer who appears to be an autobio (Author's name is Actionreporter - same as the domain name he registered for his personal website). Scored 503Ghits, of which 70 non-mirror, other than wiki and his own site, it shows he is indeed a photographer who gives digital photo courses at Nikon france, as well as take action photos. Little independently verifiable info about his life and his businesses. His site is linked to 78 pages, of which 47 were [external] pages, several were from macandphoto.com, which he uses to publicise his photography courses, and a to number of private blogs testimonials about his photography. Searching under ridingzone sourced info to prove that the site was indeed bought by Wanadoo, division of FranceTel. The Dec '01 article mentions staff grievances at the intended closure of the business (mixing editorial with ecommerce) which originally forecast FFR20m turnover in the first year, only to see it come in at FFr400k. Ohconfucius 13:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like vanity and advertising. Head of what appears to be a very minor company. -- Necrothesp 13:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Punkmorten 12:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable podcast, only 20 unique Ghits. [38] Was tagged by an anon, but nomination page couldn't be completed. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge with Princess Elena of Romania.--SB | T 23:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another minor royal personage connected to the British and Romanian royal families. Article was prod'd, prod removed. The subject is approx 85th in line for the British throne and may or may not be in line for the Romanian throne were the monarchy ever to be restored there (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelica Kreuger for discussion of hypothetical Romanian succession.) Beyond 85th in line and being a granddaughter of ex-King Michael (but not of a reigning monarch as she was born after Michael was exiled) the article makes no claims to notability. It is, inevitably, unreferenced. Google hits are the usual WP and echoes plus royalty sites, none of which constitute WP:RS per WP:V or WP:BIO. No gnews hits for Medforth-Mills. It therefore seems unlikely that the subject meets WP:BIO guidelines for biographies. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep as per Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable elementary school. (Tagged by another editor. Nomination was incomplete, this page was not created.) Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 13:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as a substantially identical repost of deleted material. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 14:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a recreation duplicate of an article that was previously deleted as Edgar se cae; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar se cae. Jay Maynard 14:02, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. WP:WEB, self-promotion, Alexa rank is 969,691 VoiceOfReason 14:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete - G6.--Andeh 19:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense, no sources --Barnaul 14:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as an attack page. It is extremely unlikely that someone who supposedly murdered so many people would not have a single relevant Google result. The dying of a tumor in his rectum is also suspicious. It appears that there is someone in the present day who had the same name, which may be the person being attacked. There is a (non-attack) memorial page for him (the person in the article supposedly died in 1922, but that does not mean much). -- Kjkolb 17:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Google turned up nothing for either of the books listed as references, and neither did the Library of Congress database. In addition, Googling Aliks Sauvè truns up nothing relevant. Looks like a hoax, and is definitely unverifiable. (I notice a similarly-named article has been deleted previously; not sure if it was related) -- makomk 15:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unused disambiguation page (no article links to it). Also an unlikely search term, although one editor has claimed to have searched on it before. Finally, it's POV to include Spring Holiday as a disambiguation item, because it's POV to imply that "Spring Holiday" is evidence of secularization of Christian holidays. (And if Spring Holiday is removed, there's no longer any need for a disambiguation page.) Powers T 15:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Only 196 results in google and no ranking in alexa. Notability not sourced or properly ascerted and near as I can find fails WP:WEB. Lid 15:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
At first, this seemed like just another band vanity page, and after the creator didn't respond to my comments on their talk page, I speedied it. However, the creator left some comments on my talk page, and I now believe that this article could actually stay on Wikipedia. I'm putting it up for AFD, but abstaining from voting since I'm a bit ambiguous on this. I'll let you guys decide. - ulayiti (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page should be deleted as wikipedia is not a collection of t.v. shows that are aired. The t.v show is in the form of a The Jeremy Kyle Show The t.v show is in the form of a chat show and is low on factual content. The article is a short stub like article that dose not have a place on wikipedia. It is badly written and unrefrenced and contains original research.--Lucy-marie 14:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep --Wafulz 16:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a page with an identity crisis. It started out as an article abouta musician, and now it's about a fencing coach? Either way, the coach is not notable. This Google search comes up with one hit (the Wikipedia article), and no other informatin could be found. The page fails under WP:BIO and WP:V. It had two prods, but they were removed by an anon. --Wafulz 16:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An article, unreferenced, on a webcomic which appears not to meet WP:WEB standards, or WP:V ones. Created by Candent shlimazel (talk • contribs), who appears to have contributed to this article only, not that this inevitably means that WP:SPAM or WP:VAIN apply here. The number of ghits is low, and there seems not to be even an interview with the creator on the web. Nothing resembling a reliable source popped out in my efforts to find one, which doesn't necessarily mean that there isn't one. For me, this fails WP:WEB and WP:V. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Complete and obvious hoax. The name, when searched with quotes, registers a whopping ONE Ghit. fuzzy510 17:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per CSD:G4. Stifle (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I AFD'd the page a few weeks ago. The result was delete, however, it was recreated on August 20th. The page has even less than it did before the deletion. Please look at the old discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Survivor episodes TeckWizTalkContribs# of Edits 17:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Was speedy-nominated but an editor untagged it. Presuming good faith untag, although no reason was given, so might as well bring it here. Soo 17:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Discussion closed. List of Smallville Episodes will stay in existence.
This page has created a redundancy in the Smallville episode pages. Seasonal pages have already been in place for almost a year, while this page has just been created. This page is in poor quality and contains incorrect information. Though it may be a more common practice to list episodes this way, it isn't a mandatory practice. The Seasonal pages have been around longer, and have managed to condense the information into what is important, instead of creating individual episode pages that just draw out the plot details. Seasonal pages are an improvement on "episode lists". They don't create excess pages for needless plot details, keep "trivia" to what is important and noteable, keep "guest stars" to major roles and not "the milk man standing in the background barely in focus". Bignole 17:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Arguments against Deletion The content and quality of the seasonal pages will be preserved and moved to new articles for each episode. Having an article for each episode allows more information about each episode to be preserved in an appropriate location. The seasonal summary pages and List of Smallville allusions have to exclude otherwise appropriate information to avoid becoming large and cluttered.
The page was only recently created; that is not finished is no reason to delete it. A tag at the top of the page appropriately notes this fact. It is not linked to from the main Smallville article, not will it be until it is ready.
The format proposed follows the guidelines set forth in Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Television episodes. List of Smallville allusions is strong evidence that there is "enough independently verifiable information included about individual episodes" to warrant individual episode pages.
Debate History The debate grew out of a discussion of what merited inclusion in List of Smallville allusions (Talk). I (Anþony) proposed that the Allusions page be eventually removed in favor of a Trivia or References section in individual episode pages yet to be created. Upon learning of the plan to create pages for each episode, the discussion spilled over into Talk:List of Smallville episodes, where Bignole immediately suggested deleting the page in favor of the current per-season format.
The result was Delete, for the record, all but one of the keeps was a single-purpose account, and the other was the article's creator Deville (Talk) 14:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable neologism, per WP:NEO. With a limited number of search engine hits, I doubt the accuracy of this article. Likely hoax, it is only used officially on a vegan-pro website, which, according to the article, was the coin-er of the term. Iolakana•T 17:55, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
~mjoy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Melanie Joy (talk • contribs) .
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.79.137.49 (talk • contribs) 10:19, 2 September 2006.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod for a non-notable, unreleased film by a non-notable company Nuttah68 17:57, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Deville (Talk) 01:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
autobiography JoJan 18:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Punkmorten 12:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the prod tag because I feel that, at the very least, the subject is sufficiently notable that he may meet the threshold. I have doubts about its deletion and feel that this should be brought to the community for discussion. He's been exhibited in high-profile galleries and the like. I'm currently leaning towards keep, as it's a fairly well-written article and I feel it should be given the benefit of the doubt. Captainktainer * Talk 18:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Punkmorten 12:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am sure Daniel Paashaus is an interesting and accomplished photographer, and one day may merit an article. However, at the moment there are no outstanding achievements cited, apart from artist in residence at Millersville University for 2005-2006. I don't think this alone is sufficient for inclusion. Tyrenius 18:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As this is a WP:BLP comments should display a suitable sensitivity. Thank you. Tyrenius 18:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User's 2nd contribution using this IP
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod (with prod2). Non-notable neologism without a single google hit. Geoffrey Spear 18:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. —Xyrael / 07:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary list. Most of the data on the list is copied from broadway.com. Author contends that he has also added data from other sources, however, these additions are minimal, and I still believe that it is out of place in an encyclopedia. A link to the broadway.com page on the main article would suffice Robotforaday 18:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested speedy bio. A vanity page with a couple of 'facts' thrown in as an attempt to disguise the article Nuttah68 18:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO and the google test. Would consider recreation if contestant becomes notable on the show (ie. first or second place). In comparision: Kathy Vavarick-O'Brien has been on two Survivor seasons and doesn't have a Wikipedia page. Adam Gentry has not even been shown on Survivor yet, has little past, and already has a page. The page is also completely uncited.TeckWizTalkContribs# of Edits 18:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Working with famous bands doesn't make him notable. 11 Ghits for "Matthew Edge" recording engineer. Delete as nn studio tech. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djbrianuk (talk • contribs)
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Each article will have to be considered on their own merits. A group nomination for AfD could be performed but having one article deleted doesn't automatically mean that the others are, especially since the author hasn't been informed of their prospective deletion. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure on the correct way forward here. User:QelDroma06 has created over 100 articles, contribs, most of which are similar to this. Wikipedia is not here to act as a catalogue of ESP products and unless something makes a particular model notable all should be deleted. Nuttah68 19:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD G6 - housekeeping, an AfD discussion was closed but closing admin overlooked the deletion of a nominated article. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 21:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a relisting. The page was originally part of a joint Afd discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDWinXP. The admin who closed that debate appears to have overlooked this article Nuttah68 19:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. A 'how to' spam Nuttah68 19:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article written about the Dysartes website by one of the founders of said website (who is referenced in the article). Not only is that methodology questionable, the website is no more notable than any other 40K fansite or community. Through reading the article, the article serves only to advertise a gaming club, get some people's handles out to the public (also advertising) and advertise a store website. All of these are prohibited by WP policy. MSJapan 19:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as advert for three weeks with. Article appears to be the same info in a number of languages. Article not edited since creation. Nuttah68 19:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 14:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Spam. Offers no more than cut and paste from the website it links to Nuttah68 19:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:51, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another Naruto fan character. Possible WP:OR violation, definite fancruft. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 19:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable person. No assertions are made about importance, and some exploratory research indicates that there are none to make. To give a general idea: google hits for "gustavo moya": 571, many of which appear to be about different people. Hits for gumoz (an alias given in the article): 479, many of which are forum pages. Hits for ixaya gustavo (Ixaya is the open source community mentioned in the article): 13. I understand that Google isn't the last word on notability, but I think it's a reasonably admissible metric for gauging the notability of someone who is reportedly heavily involved in technology. Delete. --Moe Aboulkheir 19:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism with no usage in published literature. This idiosyncratic use is limited to transgender advocacy websites. In addition, Benjamin Syndrome is already used to classify another condition: Hypochromic anemia with mental retardation and various craniofacial and other anomalies. Jokestress 19:48, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete - I PROD'd it a couple of times but kept being removed by 'lorne epstein' who I assume is the same person as the article is about. Seems to generate about 30 or so unique google references. no real sign of notability but I can be convinced otherwise. Charlesknight 20:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Transwiki to Wikibooks. Now tagged with ((Move to Wikibooks)). (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is simply a tutorial about wordperfect keyboard shortcuts and contains no encyclopedic information about the software. As per WP:NOT, it should be transwiki'ed or deleted. BigE1977 20:03, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy redirect, see final comment. Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 18:46, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Rejected as a speedy non notable group of people. Non notable campaign and group of people Nuttah68 20:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete due to multiple keep votes from a reasonably new editor. —Xyrael / 07:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable poet, author, and film producer whose self-published books have Amazon sales ranks in the millions. No reliable sources given or likely to be found. Delete --Huon 20:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I also nominate Ayres' publication, Van Gogh's Ear: Best World Poetry & Prose, which gives less than 10 Google hits, and his company, French Connection Films, which fails WP:CORP, both by the same author. The combination gives an impression of advertisement and/or vanity. --Huon 20:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Van Gogh's Ear should stay. Over 100 Van Gogh's Ear: Best World Poetry & Prose Google hits came up on a more thorough search. The contributors' list does prove that Van Gogh's Ear is an important publication. --Jimmy Russell 22:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 21:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable game clan. Article apparently written by one of its members. GregorB 20:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete what appears to be a neologism. Mindmatrix 20:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus, so keeping as a default, but I think no precedent should be read from this --- Deville (Talk) 14:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable person; article is nearly speedy-able for failing to assert notability, but not quite. At any rate, there's no indication that this person meets the WP:BIO criteria. Further, the author's sole edits are here, which makes this look like WP:VANITY. Valrith 21:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is a promotional piece for a petition for an non-existent movie. Hamiltonian 21:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Punkmorten 10:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a student project in Kansas State University. Its highest placing was fifth in the American Solar Challenge. In the List of solar car teams, there are several cars that are featured as articles, but most of them have top-place or second place finishes in their respective races (Nuna, for example, has three consecutive top place finishes in the World Solar Challenge). The article is also unsourced with reliable sources. If someone can show me how this meets notability guidelines, I'll reconsider. ColourBurst 21:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Deville (Talk) 00:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
spam. Coca666 22:01, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Please defer merge discussion to article talk page. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:54, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing in this article to suggest notability outside of Big Brother. talk to JD wants e-mail 22:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily Deleted as a non-notable biography. 82.33.48.5 13:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod for porn star who has only appeared in two films. Delete as per Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors). --Allen3 talk 22:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 10:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable organization with no sources and reads like advertisement; only Ghit for "Viridian Villages" is this article. Article starter has also created a number of db-bio and other AfD nominees. May even be a hoax (check the article discussion page for the response to prod (which was deleted). ju66l3r 22:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep per DRV. (aeropagitica) (talk) 11:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A DRV consensus overturned the previous deletion of this article through this AfD in light of new evidence. Please consult the DRV for this evidence before commenting here. This matter is submitted for new consideration to AfD. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 23:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly written article, pages are in other languages. Notability asserted, but WP:V is a problem. Gets 30K Google hits, 14K of those in English. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 23:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —Xyrael / 07:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Listing per DRV. Article was previously deleted as an apparent hoax, but that's not covered by CSD. Abstain. 1ne 23:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy deleted by DakotaKahn. Thanks/wangi 13:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have been some confusion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs about sex where this was added to the AFD early on, received a few merge's and wasn't deleted at the end. To avoid confusion I'm relisting — "Unmaintainable list that violates WP:NOT". See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about sex. Thanks/wangi 23:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfied and deleted. (aeropagitica) (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize, I created two AfD's (one for Bubble Hash, one for bubblehash, I just fixed it but it's in Aug 27. Vpoko 01:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 10:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article only escapes speedy deletion because the article claims some notability. But that claim is not sufficient. No released CD, no national exposure. Pascal.Tesson 23:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 02:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page sounds WAY too much like a game guide. Any useful information should be saved in the minigames article. Hemhem20X6 23:58, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. Almost the entire article is cruft apart from the first paragraph or two - if anyone wishes to save more of the article they can copy and paste or rewrite into the mini-games article. I had intended to do something with this article but haven't had the time, but now I'm taking out anything which IMO is worth keeping and porting it over. Interested parties, please take a look at the RuneScape mini-games article, but I reckon the job will already be done by the time an admin makes a judgement on this. QuagmireDog 23:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The Castle Wars section of RuneScape mini-games -is- this page, with a different opener and the POVcruftGameGuide part of this article removed. When I took the rest of the information over to mini-games, I literally copied and pasted everything beneath the opener and above the 'player types' section, including the tool list. The tool list was collapsed into a few sentences of prose and placed accordingly, the rest was tweaked and slightly reworded to remove NN/guide text. There is little else to be said about the subject whilst remaining this side of relevance, anything additional will fit onto the mini-games article. QuagmireDog 00:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ok. But this is now over 5 days old; when will the discussion be closed? Hemhem20X6 00:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete all, CSD A7. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 08:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SPAM. A self-promotion page linked glaringly to the author's products, which I'd also suggest for deletion.
- IceCreamAntisocial 00:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 10:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Page appears to be personal promotion. ChinaNailStorm 00:31, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]