The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Racing Dynamics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of this car tuning company's notability. It therefore seems that it is a WP:PROMO article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Promotional article with primary sources as its only references. No notability established. Ajf773 (talk) 04:36, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: The article describes a firm going about its business. Those basics are confirmed by online searches, but I see nothing to indicate encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 08:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:ORG, primary source and promotional content. CASSIOPEIA (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.