The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 02:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Shops at Kildeer[edit]

The Shops at Kildeer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable shopping center, sources are press releases or trivial. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I can't find anything suggesting this shopping mall is notable. Jo7hs2 (talk) 03:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - sources already cited are hovering around the threshold of the usual inclusion criterion. Pile on [1][2][3] and it becomes an easy keep. WilyD 14:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, sources in article and from WilyD meet WP:GNG. The Nordic Goddess Kristen ^{Worship her} 02:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nothing in current article indicates it is any more notable than hundreds of other shopping centers. MilborneOne (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Clearly a tiny US shopping mall. Far from the more then 500,000 sqft or so that is generally accepted as being notable. Fails WP:CORP. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I think the fact that the locals tried to prevent its construction with a lawsuit provides WP:N, if only just. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 07:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.