< March 26 March 28 >

March 27

Category:People of Abkhazian descent

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: User:Carlossuarez46/Descent categories has been used an unofficial guideline for deletion of numerous categories. They should all go as the inclusion criteria is subjective. WP:TNTPrisencolin (talk) 22:02, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is inconsistent with your rationale. "They should all go.". You do not offer a reason to single out Abkhazian descent. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:31, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • No one seems to offer those in the other discussions... in any case I have limited the discussion to Abkhazian... which from what I can tell is just a Russian client state and not really an ethno-state. (nationalists beware)--Prisencolin (talk) 22:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Law & Order (season 1) episodes

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 12:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT with only two articles. There are no sibling categories for other seasons. – Fayenatic London 19:27, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Brown priests

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: there was not a clear consensus to do anything, but in the meantime I will rename it to Category:Brown priests (Nazism) for clarity. This is not to be interpreted as meaning there was a consensus to keep the category under that name. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unexplained, and, as far as I can see, undocumented. It seems to be Roman Catholic priests who supported Hitler, but the phrase does not appear in Catholic bishops in Nazi Germany. If I am wrong and it is kept it needs some explanation. Rathfelder (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, the current members are Karl Eschweiler, Alois Hudal, Joseph Lortz, Franz Justus Rarkowski (all cited, although Lortz had a mixed record). For the initial members see [3]. – Fayenatic London 20:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christianity and atheism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:SMALLCAT, only one article each. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ceremonial Voodoo languages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:SMALLCAT, only two articles. Merging is not needed, both articles are already in Category:Ritual languages, the first article is already in Category:Haitian Vodou and the second article does not belong there. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:14, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Squatting in Kazakhstan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Squatting by country. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge per WP:C2F, this nomination was at WP:CFDS but there was no consensus yet about the merge target. The alternative merge target is Category:Squatting. But there is logic in allowing "by foo" articles in "by foo" categories. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Copy of speedy discussion
@LaundryPizza03, Mujinga, Oculi, and Fayenatic london: pinging contributors to speedy discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Red Eagle

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:Recipients of the Order of the Red Eagle
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of the Red Eagle‎
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:Recipients of the Order of the Red Eagle, 1st class‎
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:Recipients of the Order of the Red Eagle, 2nd class
  • Propose Deleting/Listifying Category:Recipients of the Order of the Red Eagle, 3rd class‎
Nominator's rationale: WP:NONDEFINING (WP:OCAWARD)
The Order of the Red Eagle served as a general purpose award from Prussia. The recipients generally fall into three categories:
I created a collapsible list with all the category contents right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Recipients of the Order of Roraima of Guyana

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose Deleting Category:Recipients of the Order of Roraima of Guyana
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:NONDEFINING (WP:OVERLAPCAT and WP:OCAWARD)
The Order of Roraima of Guyana is a general purpose award from Guyana that, in practice, is given to people who are already very prominent government officials. Of the 10 articles in this category, 4 are in Category:Guyanese politicians while 3 are in Category:Guyanese judges. (Edward Luckhoo is in both.) There are also 3 foreign government officials not remotely defined by the award: Mia Mottley and Freundel Stuart, both of Barbados, and Kim Jong-il of North Korea. The only person who is not a government official is poet Martin Carter, whose article mentions the award only in passing. There wasn't a list so I created one right here in the main article for any reader interested in the topic. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More