< December 18 December 20 >

December 19

Category:Yazidi saints

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Category:Yazidi saints

Category:Sufism in Spain

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Category:Sufism in Spain

Malikism in Algeria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:31, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Malikism by continent
  • Propose deleting Category:Malikism in Africa
  • Propose merging Category:Malikism in Algeria to Category:Maliki
Nominator's rationale: delete/merge, empty category layers because there are hardly any topic articles by region. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American footballers' wives and girlfriends

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Category:American footballers' wives and girlfriends

Muslim historians of Islam

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Muslim historians of Islam

Al-Andalus people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:People of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus people
  • Propose renaming Category:8th-century bishops in Al-Andalus to Category:8th-century Al-Andalus bishops
  • Propose renaming Category:9th-century bishops in Al-Andalus to Category:9th-century Al-Andalus bishops
  • Propose renaming Category:9th-century Jews of Al-Andalus to Category:9th-century Al-Andalus Jews
  • Propose renaming Category:10th-century bishops in Al-Andalus to Category:10th-century Al-Andalus bishops
  • Propose renaming Category:10th-century Jews of Al-Andalus to Category:10th-century Al-Andalus Jews
  • Propose renaming Category:10th-century rabbis of Al-Andalus to Category:10th-century Al-Andalus rabbis
  • Propose renaming Category:11th-century bishops in Al-Andalus to Category:11th-century Al-Andalus bishops
  • Propose renaming Category:11th-century Jews of Al-Andalus to Category:11th-century Al-Andalus Jews
  • Propose renaming Category:11th-century rabbis of Al-Andalus to Category:11th-century Al-Andalus rabbis
  • Propose renaming Category:12th-century Jews of Al-Andalus to Category:12th-century Al-Andalus Jews
  • Propose renaming Category:12th-century rabbis of Al-Andalus to Category:12th-century Al-Andalus rabbis
  • Propose renaming Category:13th-century Jews of Al-Andalus to Category:13th-century Al-Andalus Jews
  • Propose renaming Category:13th-century rabbis of Al-Andalus to Category:13th-century Al-Andalus rabbis
  • Propose renaming Category:Arabs of Al-Andalus‎ to Category:Al-Andalus Arabs
  • Propose renaming Category:Jews of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus Jews
  • Propose renaming Category:Clergy of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus clergy
  • Propose renaming Category:Scholars of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus scholars
  • Propose renaming Category:Maliki scholars of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus Maliki scholars
  • Propose renaming Category:Philosophers of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus philosophers
  • Propose renaming Category:Scientists of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus scientists
  • Propose renaming Category:Astronomers of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus astronomers
  • Propose renaming Category:Mathematicians of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus mathematicians
  • Propose renaming Category:Pharmacologists of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus pharmacologists
  • Propose renaming Category:Physicians of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus physicians
  • Propose renaming Category:Poets of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus poets
  • Propose renaming Category:Women poets of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus women poets
  • Propose renaming Category:Christians of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus Christians
  • Propose renaming Category:Slaves of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus slaves
  • Propose renaming Category:Sufis of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus Sufis
  • Propose renaming Category:Women of Al-Andalus to Category:Al-Andalus women
Nominator's rationale: rename, consistently use a nationality denonym (as many subcategories already do, e.g. Category:Al-Andalus people by century and Category:Al-Andalus writers). Marcocapelle (talk) 12:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It is as close to nationality as one can expect in medieval times. People were united by the religion and language of the ruling class. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:01, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Percussion instruments by tradition

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 12:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:OVERLAPCAT, both subcategories are already part of Category:Percussion instruments by usage as well. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:07, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not understand what needs to be discussed "as a whole". Please explain. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @Andrewa?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 09:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:World Junior Table Tennis Championships

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: New official name "ITTF World Youth Championships" has been used since 2021. LLTT (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:59, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American settlers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge or reverse merge, the scope of the categories is largely overlapping. I have tagged the targets as well, for in case of a reverse merge. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Correct, but that nomination contained an entirely different target. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The definition in this article (including "and later [from] United States") applies to all biographies currently in Category:American settlers. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:22, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:57, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Medieval scientists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 13:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: manually merge/rename, with all due respect, science in the middle ages mainly consisted of mathematics and astronomy. We do not need an intermediate scientists category layer under scholars in this period of time. Merging needs to be done manually because articles may well be in another subcategory of scholars. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:48, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • That should surely be added to scholars after renaming to scholars. Writers should be added too. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:56, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

American people of European descent by occupation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete most. No Consensus to delete "Category:American gangsters of X descent". Wrestlers, and writers/poets of X descent, should be relisted. (Listification was one option noted.) That said, this has been open a long time. So I'm just going to close this and address the ones for deletion. Anyone is welcome to "relist" the other categories at their discretion, per the normal process. And of course, if any category turns out to be "orphaned" due to losing a parent catetgory, please feel free to recategorise to an appropriate existing category. - jc37 06:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, trivial intersections between ancestor's nationality and occupation. Note 1: I have deliberately not nominated Category:American gangsters of Italian descent. Note 2: I have limited the nomination to European descent because things may be different with other ancestries. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:11, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 13:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the nomination. I believe these intersections are notable. Take, for example, the intersection listed by William Allen Simpson below. There have been numerous characters in professional wrestling whose main feature is being Italian. For example, the many members of the group Full Blooded Italians. In the context of their occupation, ethnicity is very important. There is even a published paper about professional wrestling and the immigrant experience in the United States. If you wanted to investigate whether some of these are distinct intersections and then nominate the ones which you find do not have academic research on the subject, that is something I would support. However, mass nominating them without doing cursory research into these occupation/ethnicity combinations is not helpful for Wikipedia. Nominations like this tend to encourage a view that the European experience in North America was a homogenous one, whereas numerous studies have demonstrated that Greeks, Russians, Poles, etc have had widely varying and unique experiences. Noting that none of the categories nominated are for non-Europeans, we should consider whether this makes sense in light of the extensive literature on this subject.--User:Namiba 18:28, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Better to read citations before using them for an argument.
  1. While play acting is a feature of pro-wrestling, ethnicity does not change the activity itself. In the example of Full Blooded Italians, the premise is J.T. Smith adopted the gimmick of believing himself to be an Old World Italian (despite being African American). That example proves the rule that there is/was nothing distinct and unique about Italian-American professional wrestling.
  2. Having a category for white actors performing in blackface or yellowface wouldn't pass the smell test.
  3. Best to actually read the dissertation, rather than just the title or abstract. Nothing there validates any notion of a distinct and unique ethnic method of pro-wrestling. You don't have to be German to perform a German suplex.
  4. Contrast with the gangsters categories, where they must be that ethnicity for membership.
  5. The nominator is not required to prove that there can never be a head article for each category. It is impossible to prove a negative.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
William Allen Simpson, it would be wise of you to refresh yourself on what WP:OCEGRS says, as it doesn't mention, nevermind require a unique method. It says that categories should exist for intersections which are "recognized as a distinct and unique cultural topic in its own right." As I have noted, Italian-Americans have been recognized as such in fields like professional wrestling.--User:Namiba 02:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In 2009, after extensive discussion here, I'd added "ethnicity" to our guidelines.
  1. We don't have room for every possible example, so it has been updated from time to time. I'm familiar with what we collectively meant at that time, when the primary example read: "For instance, in sports, German-Americans are not treated differently from Italian-Americans or French-Americans." See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 November 29#Category:German-American sportspeople and Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 February 16#Category:American sportspeople of European descent. Prior to December 2006, that sentence read, "For instance, in sports, Christian ice skaters are not treated differently from Jewish or Muslim ice skaters."
  2. Your note is facially incorrect. The running gag of the group was that most of the wrestlers were obviously not of Italian descent.... An African-American mimicking supposedly Italian-American stereotypical mannerisms is not recognition, it is ridicule for laughs.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 07:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Some of these are subject to speedy deletion as re-creation of previously deleted categories.
  • Category:American sportspeople of Armenian descent
  • Category:American sportspeople of Italian descent
William Allen Simpson (talk) 13:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Again, it would help if you were more familiar with the policy. It clearly states that "If a substantial and encyclopedic head article (not just a list) cannot be written for such a category, then the category should not be created. Please note that this does not mean that the head article must already exist before a category may be created, but that it must at least be reasonable to create one. There does not need to be a head article, only that one could be written.
Re: Italian Americans in sports, there is a well-studied connection that demonstrates an encyclopedic value. For example, Sport and the Shaping of Italian-American Identity By Gerald R. Gems, Beyond DiMaggio: Italian Americans in Baseball By Lawrence Baldassaro, and The playing fields of St. Louis: Italian immigrants and sports, 1925-1941
GR Mormino - Journal of Sport History, 1982. Given the expansive treatment given to the Italian-American experience in sports, it is clear that an encyclopedia shouldn't ignore it. User:Namiba 16:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding Italian Americans in trade unionsts, see From Margins to Vanguard to Mainstream: Italian Americans and the Labor Movement By Marcella Bencivenni--User:Namiba 16:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As I've already documented, there are few around who are more familiar (as I'd helped write it).
  1. Those would be in Category:Baseball literature under Category:Works about sports. This is Wikipedia:Categorization of people.
  2. Also, this is not baseball.
  3. We require that the sport topic in its own right be distinct and unique to Italian-Americans.
  4. We require that the union topic in its own right be distinct and unique to Italian-Americans.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 20:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My final statement on this is that Italian-Americans and many other Euro-American groups have been recognized in scholarship as a distinct and unique group. Therefore, I still recommend keeping them for now. This discussion shows that there is no consensus to delete.-- User:Namiba 15:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the category contents,
  1. very few are writing about the Armenian genocide. That seems reasonably well covered by Category:Armenian American literature.
  2. this is a strong example of category creep. What exactly is the distinct and unique Armenian-American writing in films Awakenings, Gangs of New York, Moneyball and The Irishman?
William Allen Simpson (talk) 13:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping, Fayenatic london.
  1. Though not a guarantee, the existence of Category:Armenian American literature is a point in favor of keeping this cat. It seems untenable to take the position that an intersection of ethnicity and literature is a distinct and unique topic but that the writers of such literature are not. Also, if we deleted the writers cat and merged upward, the literature cat would be mostly biographies (it's already 2:1 biographies). A literature cat would be a poor fit for Armenian-American non-fiction writers, like Richard G. Hovannisian.
  2. Per EGRS: "People who occupy the grey areas are not a valid argument against the existence of a category" and should just be removed. There are writers that solidly belong in the category, including William Saroyan, Peter Balakian, David Kherdian, Diana Der Hovanessian, and Garin Hovannisian. The last two are not in the cat, but should be. I'm not sure if it's considered out of process to add to a category during a CFD.
I found more sources with significant coverage of Armenian-American writers: The Magical Pine Ring: Culture and Imagination in Armenian-American Literature, a great chapter in New Immigrant Literatures in the United States: A Sourcebook to Our Multicultural Literary Heritage, and Forgotten Bread: First-Generation Armenian American Writers. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It appears that we are in substantial agreement:
  1. WP:COP-HERITAGE requires These categories should not be created without a substantial and encyclopedic well sourced head article describing the contents (not just a list). Since there is none, delete it.
  2. Most of Category:American writers of Armenian descent should just be removed in any case. There is no distinct and unique Armenian-American writing in films.
  3. As to the other external coverage, look again: we are not discussing removal of Category:Armenian American literature; moreover, decent categories are not for "first-generation" at all! WP:COP-HERITAGE should not also contain any individual migrant, emigrant, nor immigrant ....
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to note how ridiculous it is to delete certain categories, such as the trade unionist one. There is extensive literature documenting how Italians in America had a unique experience in the labor movement. They formed their own organizations and often faced intense discrimination. All of this is widely documented. Being an Italian in the US labor movement is as defining to Luigi Antonini as being African-American was to A. Philip Randolph. I note that ONLY categories for certain European groups are nominated here, not for African-Americans or other ethnic groups in the US.--User:Namiba 20:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kremlintarians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No corresponding article on Wikipedia. Category is being applied to living people without sourcing. The main reference here is to a WP:USERG wiki site. Elizium23 (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:53, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Universal Classic Monsters films

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Category:Universal Classic Monsters films

Category:Russian traditional

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Match other Russian folk categories. Category:Russian traditional music was recently speedily moved back to Category:Russian folk music.
Nominator's rationale: This (and the main article) was moved without discussion. The main article does not translate as "traditional"; it translates as "folk".
This has played havok with commons categories, and other related categories such as:
All of the other changes from folk to traditional have been reverted.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 01:04, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems to me that the (mostly reverted) changes from "folk" to "traditional" were part of an effort to subsume all these Russian Empire conquered ethnic groups into being something Russian by tradition. "Folk music" has a very specific meaning in the folklore academic literature. We shouldn't be amalgamating that into a less specific genre. Better to split the others into Lithuanian, Ukrainian, etc.
    Also noting that this change was done without discussion (via category redirect) by a user with rather contentious views, such as insisting that Lithuanian wasn't an actual language in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and some arbcom referrals for disruptive editing. Thus, I've brought this to our formal process to revert.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 00:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agreed. But we're not supposed to empty categories during discussion. Also, this is complicated by the category renaming a few years ago from "Imperial Russian" prefix to "of the Russian Empire" suffix.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 11:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the division into "of Russia" (country) and "Russian" (ethnic group) - such a division does make sense as well. In general, for objects describing the country we use names like "Dance in Russia", which can already include all ethnic minorities subtypes. Solidest (talk) 12:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Political slurs for people

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Category:Political slurs for people

Category:Muslim encyclopedists

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Category:Muslim encyclopedists

Category:Works based on the Quran

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: soft merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: upmerge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scholars of the Ottoman Empire

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 December 27#Category:Scholars of the Ottoman Empire

Category:Muslim scholars by period

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, based on the actual content the scope of the two categories appears to coincide. "By state" is more accurate than "by period". Marcocapelle (talk) 22:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 08:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Albanian gestures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Albanian gestures to Category:Albanian culture
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT that is not part of an established scheme. Both entries are already in Category:Hand gestures, and one is already in Category:Albanian culture. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 07:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bitcoin mixer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Pointless - contains only one redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bitcoin theft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 09:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only three entries. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.