The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eie-TRIGLYCERIDE.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Teledork (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Numerous fundamental chemical mistakes, including structure of the backbone and each of the chains (the latter both in chemical fact and in contradiction to in-image caption text). Ping User:Jorge Stolfi who noted many details more explicitly in the image-description page. DMacks (talk) 03:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. Aasim 21:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The olive tree on a sunny nite- joseph alexander mcmath.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Joseph Alexander Mcmath (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Mcmath Alexander Joseph with the reason: " No longer have rights to the image. Sold to a writer." FASTILY 04:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Although you cannot revoke the Creative Commons license, this image has no encyclopedic purpose. Aasim 21:51, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saints + Pompey Crests.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JohnRatz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @PeeJay with the reason "Image is a combination of two copyrighted works (File:FC Southampton.svg and File:Portsmouth FC logo.svg), neither of which could justifiably be placed in the South Coast derby article on their own under any form of Fair Use rationale." FASTILY 06:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - as original nominator. – PeeJay 06:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NFCC#3a, WP:NFCC#8, and items 14 and 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. An official logo created by the organizers of this derby specific to the derby itself could probably be used, but a user-created montage of two non-free logos side by side is kind of non-free gallery that's not really allowed per reelvant policy. A derby article is sort of child entity of the individual team articles and policy doesn't really allow the repeat use of parent entity articles for pretty much WP:DECORATIVE purposes per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1996 Republican National Convention logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SecretName101 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

other image exists of logo SecretName101 (talk) 06:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Tagged with db-g7 as nominator is also uploader. Aasim 21:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phil Ritchie. St.George Dragons 1985.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vox3000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder and that the source of the photo is "My private photo of Phil Ritchie. 1985". This appears to be a scan of a trading card. Scanning and cropping an image does not transfer the copyright. Whpq (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless the claim of "own work" can be verified by WP:OTRS. Even if we really want to WP:AGF, OTRS should still be required just rule out any possibility of accidental c:COM:LL. It's quite possible that the uploader liked the original photo or even owns a copy of the playing card and just thought that adding it to Phil Ritchie (rugby league) would be an improvement since the current infobox photo show Ritchie as he appears long after he retired. The uploader did, by the way, remove the file from the article after it had been nominated for discussion here at FFD; so, maybe that's sort of an admission that the "own work" claim was improper. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scott Gourley. St.George Dragons 1994.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vox3000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder providing a source of "My private photo of Scott Gourley 1994". This images appears to be cropped from a photo from the Daily Telegraph. Scanning and cropping a photo does not transfer the copyright. Whpq (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless the claim of "own work" can be verified by WP:OTRS. Even if we really want to WP:AGF, OTRS should still be required just rule out any possibility of accidental c:COM:LL. It's quite possible that the uploader liked the original photo and just cropped it to add to Scott Gourley because that article didn't have an image. The uploader did, by the way, remove the file from that article after it had been nominated for discussion here at FFD; so, maybe that's sort of an admission that the "own work" claim was improper. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 2. Izno (talk) 15:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fair Use of The Soulquarians.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Rugby League (logo).svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by XLerate (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not used as the primary means of visual identification. The use of historical, former, alternate or anniversary logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the logo itself is described in the context of sourced critical commentary about that logo. Jonteemil (talk) 22:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 2. Izno (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 NRL Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 October 5. Izno (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Execution of Nguyen Van Lem.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

File:Execution of Nguyễn Văn Lém.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.