The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete as likely copyvio: linked Flickr page is marked CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 Vahurzpu (talk) 00:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 20 non-free images on Aruban florin.
Having every front and back of both editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already another image of the bill in the article in the table File:Clydesdale-Polymer-£5-Front.png. Back of the bill is not critical to the understanding of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a - There is already another image of the bill in the article in the table File:RBS-Polymer-£5-Front.png. Back of the bill is not critical to the understanding of the article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:51, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.
Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.
Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.
Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.
Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are 20 non-free images on Nicaraguan córdoba.
Having every front and back of old editions of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from the non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from that series, one image can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:36, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Blythwood with the reason "Copyright violation. While this is presented as out of copyright due to publication in 1847, the map explicitly says it comes from a 1985 book and shows the results of a 1975 treaty. While the map shows the political divisions of treaties of 1847 and 1913, there's no evidence that this map itself dates from those time points." FASTILY 07:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
See c:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. We have a copyright tag for the object, but we also need one for the photograph. Stefan2 (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
No explanation of why a newly created aerial photo would not serve the same purpose. In order for the FUR to be valid, the appearance of the campus must have been significantly different back in 1951 vs. now, and that difference must be discussed in the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:50, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
This non-free image is claimed to be used for visual identification of an episode of McGyver. However, it is not a title card, logo or other such image that actually identifies the episode. The image also not the subject of significant sourced commentary in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 17:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Building is in the same condition as it would be right now, so it can be replaced by a newly taken freely licensed photo. We only allow non-free images when free equivalents cannot be created, not when they merely don't exist. Now, a non-free image of the original appearance of the church would clear the bar of replaceability, but it would still fail WP:NFG. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:26, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Initially tagged for deletion with ((Di-fails NFCC)) with the following argument: "Criterion 8, because the file does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding". It was contested on the file's talk page by the uploader. Listing for further discussion as a neutral party. ƏXPLICIT 23:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
The screenshot of three characters (whose roles in the episode are already conveyed without a multimedia content) at an outdoor location illustrates the scene itself but doesn't demonstrate why the character's importance (or prominence) would not be well understood without an image of him in the episode. If you don't believe that the article adequately educates readers about the episode without an image, how about using an image of gay animals doing the disco dance shown to one of main characters by Big Gay Al, which is detailed at the "Animation" section? Even then, the disco scene itself lasted just a few seconds or less and is already conveyed by text, so I don't know whether an image of that is needed. George Ho (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)