April 7
File:Bissu sembahyang.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. It's also unclear if the uploader even owns the rights to the image as it had appeared elsewhere prior to the upload to Wikipedia. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bissu sembahyang.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blackman Jr. (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
GFDL only is no longer a valid license per Template:No more GFDL. MGA73 (talk) 12:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Looney loops.png
File:YoungLilabatiSivabrataBhattacherjeearchives.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- File:21 Vandeventer Place, St. Louis - Henry L. Newman House.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by RGKMA (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This image of a building is claimed to be PD because of publication without notice between 1928 and 1977. This claim is based on the building having been demolished in 1950 so the photo must be 1950 or earlier, and th uploader cannot find evidence of a copyright notice. However, there is no information about where and when this image was originally published to evaluate this claim for PD. Whpq (talk) 15:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Bernhard Goetz.jpeg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:35, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bernhard Goetz.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jerome Frank Disciple (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free image of a living person :3 F4U (they/it) 16:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion originated on WP:MFD, before User: Glades12 pointed out it should be here, instead. I've taken the liberty of moving the discussion.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 17:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free image of a living person :3 F4U (they/it) 16:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello! I'm concededly a novice when it comes to WP image policies. From what I understand from F4U, images of living persons are rarely accepted. But I think there are two potential reasons why an exception should be made in this case. First, the image is a dual biography picture and historical-event picture: The image is of Goetz is not a random "subject walking on the street" image, as many pictures of Goetz are. Rather, it depicts him at his resentencing hearing related to the charges that stemmed from the 1984 New York City Subway shooting, which is the only article for which this image is used. That resentencing is discussed, albeit briefly, in the article here. In other words, the image serves to illustrate both Goetz (because no free picture of Goetz can be found) and an event discussed in the article, the resentencing hearing (because no free image of that event can be found). Second, a modern image of Goetz would be less appropriate, because Goetz has nearly doubled in age. Importantly, the article is not on Goetz; it is on the 1984 shooting and its cultural and legal aftermath. As such, I'd argue that there's value in relatively contemporaneous photographs. Goetz, born in late 1947, was 37 at the time of the shooting and 41 at the time of his resentencing (and this photograph). He is now 75.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 16:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per WP:F7 as a Getty image where the photo itself is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. This image also fails to satisfy WP:NFCC#8 as its removal does nothing to detract from a reader's understanding of the article, in particular anything about the resentencing can be understood without seeing this image. -- Whpq (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Moot/not actionable. The "replacement" on Commons has been nominated for deletion as per the discussion below, nothing left to do here -FASTILY 23:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ExoMars 2016 TGO and EDM trans-small.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Huntster (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I don't think we need this non-free image anymore as NASA has released its own rendering of the orbiter. [1] Ixfd64 (talk) 19:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: New image is available at File:ExoMars Orbiter (transparent).png. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Huntster: Uh-oh... looks like we have a problem. I found a near-identical version of the new file that is credited to the ESA [2] and which predates the creation of the linked NASA page. This calls the copyright status of the images of non-NASA spacecraft on that page into question. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ixfd64, anytime you come across situations like that, tag them for deletion. We can only work with the information we have at the time, and must be open to new data down the road calling them into question. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Suraj Pawar at Aatpat Production.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Suraj Pawar at Aatpat Production.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Morekar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Image is of a living person, uploaded as a non-free image as the source does not have a compatible license. This fails WP:NFCC#1 as this is a living person and there could be a free equivalent available or that could be taken by someone. Ravensfire (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Sayli Patil at Ghar Banduk Biryani Music launch.jpg
File:Sayaji Shinde at Ghar Banduk Biryani.jpg
File:Reece Walsh 2023.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Reece Walsh 2023.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by MrAshFazbear (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Copyright violation for all their uploads Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.