< June 6
June 8 >

June 7

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 7, 2016.

Big bum

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. Also, "big" is subjective and "bum" is ambiguous. Steel1943 (talk) 23:12, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big bug movie

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now that the term has been added and explained in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 13:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect is misleading and ambiguous. The use of the word "big" is unclear, and the word "bug" is not exclusive to arthropods. Steel1943 (talk) 23:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big booty

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget' Cash_Out#Singles. Deryck C. 15:09, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since the target is a disambiguation page, the redirect is misleading since there are no subjects known specifically as "big booty" listed on the disambiguation page. (Note: the redirect has previous history as an article.) Steel1943 (talk) 22:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big boobs

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 15#Big boobs

Big bonus culture

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Steel1943 (talk) 22:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big Bayram

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Deryck C. 15:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article, so the connection is unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big+Ten+Channel

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like an unlikely search term due to the "+" symbols. Steel1943 (talk) 22:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Big foundation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - vague, similar to Large foundation. Peter James (talk) 21:18, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects to Wikipedia:Sock puppetry

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. This will also entail a move of Multiple accounts (disambiguation) (cf. WP:MALPLACED), though I don't find specific consensus to disambiguate the term. --BDD (talk) 19:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace instead of to the article, also "account" has various meanings and this only applies to one in certain circumstances. These don't exist in the Wikipedia namespace so could be moved there as an alternative to deletion. Peter James (talk) 20:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crappy 1980s Live Action Network

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in article. The only reference I could find to connect the two subjects is this YouTube video about a random email/message sent to Adult Swim that they put up during commercial breaks. Delete per WP:NOTWIKIA. Steel1943 (talk) 17:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, not speedy. Supposedly this was a gag that the network did when they picked up rights to Saved By The Bell, but it's an incredibly obscure reference. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:16, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

듬뿍

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four redirects by the same creator. The first two are ordinary Korean dictionary words pointing to disambiguation pages which don't contain any topic which actually covers the meaning of those words; even if they did it would be WP:RFOREIGN, but they probably aren't recent enough to qualify for WP:CSD#R3. The last two are letter salads pronounced sorta like the targets when you read them aloud, but have never appeared anywhere else on the internet; they fall under WP:R#D5 "makes no sense" or WP:R#D8 "unlikely synonym" or whatever. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Autowikibrowser

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful WP:XNR, like AutoWikiBrowser. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Grace Shepard

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:35, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily appropriate to redirect to that particular TV show's page, as it is not even a lead role and he had other roles. It is only linked from Winx Club where this redirect does not really help the reader. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing the link from Winx Club. There's no notable voice actress under that name and she is voicing a supporting minor character that such an article would not be created anyway. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hongyundaodao Station

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 14#Hongyundaodao Station

Lee Chae rim

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:R#D2 confusing. The target's surname is Park not Lee. It could also be a typo for Lee Chae-rin. And there are actual potentialyl-notable people by this name. Between the WP:XY "misnomer for two different things" issue and the bad punctuation/capitalisation, we're better off deleting this. 210.6.254.106 (talk) 08:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Largest market square

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are misleading, considering that Market square is not a redirect to City square or vice versa. Steel1943 (talk) 04:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large landing craft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect's target is unclear on what defines a "large" landing craft. Otherwise, the term "large" is a subjective and ambiguous adjective. Steel1943 (talk) 04:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • If all of the incoming links are replaced with a link to Landing craft, the issue will be resolved. The fact that the nominated redirect has incoming links seems like a case of someone thinking that the term was encyclopedic and linking it rather than linking "Landing craft". Steel1943 (talk) 22:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • No sources of the such seem to currently be present in the target article, nor is there a definition present in the target article about how a "large" landing craft is determined. Yes, the term "large landing craft" is mentioned in the target article at least twice, but in their context, the word "large" is used just as an adjective for the term "landing craft" and not as a distinct defined term. Steel1943 (talk) 19:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large local reaction

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn, now that the redirect has been defined at its target, including what qualifies for the "large" designation. Steel1943 (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(Redirect's target changed from Insect bites and stings to Allergy around the time of the following signature.) Steel1943 (talk) 17:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect seems too ambiguous to be useful. For one, apparently, a "large local reaction" on the skin can also occur as a result of an injection. In addition, the phrase "large local reaction" seems quite ambiguous: Could this refer to a reaction of a large size from a local community in response to something? Steel1943 (talk) 04:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomimator rationale update: Now that Local reaction has been created as a redirect towards Allergy, the nominated redirect has been retargeted to Allergy as well. Even with this, I still believe that the nominated redirect should be deleted since the criteria for what makes a "large" local reaction is not defined in the target article, and thus seems ambiguous and based on perspective. Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is the first hit on Google. A journal article in the American Family Physician [6] which says "Patients with previous large local reactions have a 5 to 10 percent risk of experiencing systemic reactions to future stings." and "Large local reactions are usually late-phase IgE-mediated allergic reactions, with severe swelling (eight to 10 inches in diameter) developing over 24 to 48 hours and resolving in two to seven days." and "Large local reactions are more common than systemic reactions and are mediated by IgE in up to 85 percent of cases." etc
The second ref is from Uptodate which says "Approximately 10 percent of people develop severe redness and swelling after a sting; this is called a large local reaction. The area may become large (4 inches [10 cm] or more) over 1 to 2 days, then slowly resolve over 5 to 10 days." [7]
Third and 4th hit is from the the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology. All of them refer to insect stings. In fact I see nothing in the first dozen hits that use the term differently. This is a thing in medicine User:Steel1943. Maybe some obscure source uses the term in another way. If so can you please provide a reference? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:13, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James: Your research seems to enforce the possibility that "large local reaction" is both a topic in itself and not exclusive to stings. What you have found makes me think that this redirect probably needs to be deleted per WP:REDLINK so an article can be created. But no, in medicine, I have not found any references of it used in any other way than to represent the subject of a physical reaction to certain types of stings and shots of medicine. (See this reference in regards to this term applying to "shots of medicine/injections. This find is why I have the initial concern about the redirect being misleading since the term "large local reaction" is not exclusive to bee/wasp stings.) Steel1943 (talk) 13:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Doc James: I don't mean to bombard you with pings, but after seeing your user page and that you are versed in the medical field, I found something that I wonder if you may be able to tell me in regards to this redirect term. From what I have found about the term "large local reaction" as well as the term local reaction (which doesn't exist), it seems that the term may be somewhat synonymous with the subject at the existing article Adverse drug reaction (per what I read in the aforementioned article.) Do the subjects seem related? Steel1943 (talk) 16:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also, here are a couple of references I found that seem to refer to "local reactions" as a result of injected vaccines: [1] & [2]. Steel1943 (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes agree it can also occur following immunization and immunotherapy. It is a type of allergy. Might be reasonable to redirect both there to tell you the truth.
Anyway made the change and will add the terms to the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Makes sense to me. I'll go ahead and create Local reaction as a redirect to Allergy. However, I'm not sure how technically defined the word "large" in "large local reaction" would be at this point (What then would constitute terming something a "large" local reaction), so my opinion regarding the nominated redirect remains unchanged (deletion). Anyways, thanks for this information! Steel1943 (talk) 16:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I ended up not creating Local reaction since I was beat to it. Either way, my opinion about the nominated redirect remains unchanged as referenced in my edit conflict (deletion), but it's good to have a useful target for Local reaction. Also, I have updated the nomination to reflect the new target since I agree that it is a more useful target than its previous one (though I don't agree with the nominated redirect's existence.) Steel1943 (talk) 17:01, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Large is greater than 10 cm per here [8]. Not sure why you still wish to delete? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see now. (Must have missed that addition.) Steel1943 (talk) 13:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large orchestra

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation iff the phrase is explained somewhere. As noted in the discussion, the specific meaning of the phrase is not intuitive. --BDD (talk) 19:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear what makes an orchestra a "large orchestra". The term "large orchestra" is not present in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 04:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget per Schweiwikist below. Uanfala (talk) 11:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large view

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect does not seem like a notable synonymous term for the target. For this reason, the redirect is ambiguous, especially considering View is a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 03:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large foundation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since these redirects target a disambiguation page, they are misleading since the subjects on the disambiguation page are not known as "large foundation." Steel1943 (talk) 03:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large integer

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 14#Large integer

Malthusian Blues

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 15#Malthusian Blues

Al-Farsi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was dabify, technically set index, moving Al-Farsi (surname) over the redirect. --BDD (talk) 18:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(neelix) I am pretty sure take this to Al-Fasi where Al-Fasi (disambiguation) Salman the Persian was not the only Persian called Farsi for fairly obvious reasons (because he was Farsi). I think this is kinda "blocking" my search, there may be other variants but the search engine kinda "blocks" my finding them while this is in the way (by eliminating what it believes are redundant results). Si Trew (talk) 14:31, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Uanfala is it a diffferent surname or just a different transliteration? That was my nagging doubt. I have seen Al-Farsi far more often than Al-Fasi but I wasn't sure hence RfD. Certainly we should hatnote the two articles if we make a surname DAB I think. Si Trew (talk) 21:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To a British ear, SiTrew, they might sound like diffferent transliterations, but to almost anyone else they aren't. Minding our r's as much as the p's and q's. But a See also entry on the page of one, pointing to the other, goes without saying. Uanfala (talk) 23:29, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But this is the English-language wikipedia. Only a small portion of Arabic-language referents of "al-Fārsī" can be referred to like that in English. Uanfala (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Backcrest

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This has been bugging me (Neelix) and we also have neckcrest and back-crest and neck-crest and as you can imagine lots of other variants. Are these valid terms? I would think it was more likely a typo for backrest, neckrest (headrest) and so on, User:Plantdrew or User:Peter coxhead may know I could see in ornithology/anatomy a grebe for example could be described as having a backcrest but do they actually describe them that way? Those kind of things are not at the target, a DAB. A horse's mane is not really a backcrest because it's on its neck not its back (which yes technically is part of the spine, I know). My Collins Concise doesn't have it, dictionary.com doesn't have it. I don't have the OED to hand and only a pocket Collins Gem for identifying birds so I am a bit stumped on this one. Si Trew (talk) 12:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

There are loads of hypenated variants but I kinda need a sanity check as a test case before I take them all to CSD. Si Trew (talk) 12:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen some of them used in ornithological articles. FunkMonk (talk) 14:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Okie doke Speedily withdrawn by nominator as keep. Thanks to User:FunkMonk for the sanity check. Si Trew (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in case someone has an answer to Ivanvector's query.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Millerette

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Neelix) is this all right as ((R from short name))((R from singular)). I mean to take for example The Runettes can you kinda call one of them a millerette or does it apply only to the team as a whole? Si Trew (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I must have misspelled the Runettes there don't know the spelling, you know the Motown singers? Si Trew (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong vowel. Also, wrong label. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I meant "Motown" generically I admit rather than the specific label. I should have chosen an example I could actually spell I guess but all the other examples (say The Beatles or the Andrews Sisters) that spraing to mind at the time you can kinda do in singular. Si Trew (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PLURALPT which uses Seattle Seahawk as the example. Other names aren't primary topic. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large car

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator with no opposing votes. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect does not seem to be an synonymous term for its target. Because of this, the word "large" is ambiguous since any size of car could seem large, depending on perspective. Steel1943 (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Large bills

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Currency" is not exclusive to the United States, "bills" is not exclusive to "currency" (as shown at Bill), and the redirect is ambiguous since the term "large bills" could refer to bird's beaks. Steel1943 (talk) 03:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

귤즙

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFOREIGN. Orange juice does not have an affinity or is exclusive to Korean-speaking cultures. Steel1943 (talk) 03:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Four-in-a-row

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 June 14#Four-in-a-row

More