< February 6
February 8 >

February 7

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 7, 2019.

Desistence

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible, misleading redirect. There is desistence of gender dysphoria (which is not the same as redirect target detransition), but there's just as well desistence of ADHD symptoms. I could find no indication that detransition is anywhere close to the primary context, certainly not an alternative name for the same concept. Huon (talk) 22:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Correct knowledge

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of "Correct knowledge" in target article. Search results are generally not about Vidya. Possible POV. Certes (talk) 12:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I found the phrase in an old version of a duplicate article Vidyā, but I still don't think it justifies the redirect. Certes (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mineralogical Magazine

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 17#Mineralogical Magazine

Book Your Own Fucking Life

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 15#Book Your Own Fucking Life

Rugby league players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete redirects with no space, keep the rest. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are legacy redirects, that does not link to any current article(s), and it is highly-unlikely that a user would ever type these into the “search Wikipedia” text box... DynamoDegsy (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 18:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DETERMINEPRIMARY

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:15, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was supposed to be WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY, but the user creating the redirect forgot namespace in page title and redirect target. Then they realized their mistake creating WP:DETERMINEPRIMARY with the namespaces. Now stands as a problematic cross-namespace redirect PorkchopGMX (talk with me - what i've done) 18:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:IBA team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep, at least while the redirect has transclusions. Thryduulf (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not using the "Infobox" prefix naming convention and too similar to Template:IBA teams. Gonnym (talk) 09:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 17:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:ABA team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Keep Thryduulf (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not using the "Infobox" prefix naming convention and too similar to Template:ABA Teams. Gonnym (talk) 09:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 17:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Intel Core gen10 (TigerLake)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:31, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion - set of bad spellings, redundant disambiguation parentheses, spurious bracket Intel Core gen3 (IvyBridge)), implausible typos, and non-useful uncommon "genX" titled redirects which are only used by this unsourced orphan article (also up for deletion) by the same single editor. WP:OR at it's best from a WP:SPA editor. Widefox; talk 01:01, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 04:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor Talk 17:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Small coal

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 17#Small coal

Austrianism

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 17#Austrianism

Cat;att

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These redirects contain a typo. The equivalent redirects with a colon instead of a semi-colon are not nominated. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Same (album)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any albums (at least with articles) titled "Same" to redirect this to. I can't figure out why, in any case, it would redirect to Eponym. There might be some long story but I assume it was result of a page move/mistake somewhere along the way. Unless there is a better target, I believe it should be terminated. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In some music catalogs, eponymous music albums (e.g. "The Beatles (album)") are named "Same". i see no use in this redirect, but maybe it prevents people from using that title (?) E-Kartoffel (talk) 16:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 10:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fat body

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G6 to allow recreation. -- Tavix (talk) 17:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete to make room for an article on this subject (I wish to be credited as the page author). The new content is being prepared in my sandbox. — Yerpo Eh? 10:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

0.99999999999999999999999999999999

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible and unlikely to be searched and used. No one will add thirty-two "9"s to search for 0.999... B dash (talk) 02:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 February 16#1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Pacific Shipping, Inc.,

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect page for Pacific Shipping, Inc. I had thought this page had been deleted when I moved the page last month. Zinnober9 (talk) 00:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
More