The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Kevin McGee (showbiz) → Matt Lucas#Personal life  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think that there's a need for a redirect as the only mention of this Kevin McGee is in the target article, Matt Lucas, and if there is a need, 'showbiz' is probably not the right qualifier. Leschnei (talk) 21:20, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Odd disambiguator, and non-notable subject. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. kingboyk (talk) 00:42, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Themexicanrunner → The Mexican Runner  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible typo _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep because he's often known by his Twitch username, without the spaces. For example, web searches for "themexicanrunner" bring up a lot of results, different from "the mexican runner". It's not an implausible typo; it's almost an alternate handle. JordiGH (talk) 19:32, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per JordiGH. Not at all implausible for an internet handle. His website is themexicanrunner.com, and several sources refer to him this way (if the objection is that this isn't "TheMexicanRunner", that's nitpicky). --BDD (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Maybe bordering on no consensus, but the result is the same either way. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:06, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• BASIC Magazine (magazine) → BASIC Magazine  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I know we generally keep redirects from unnecessary disambiguators, but this is absurd _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per my comment and the consensus at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 November 13#10 Magazine (magazine). Steel1943 (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Striking out part of my comment above to state a correction: 10 Magazine (magazine) is a ((R from incomplete disambiguation)), whereas the redirect nominated here, BASIC Magazine (magazine), is a ((R from unnecessary disambiguation)). Either way, I don't see the harm in his redirect existing since the redundancy/name in the disambiguator "(magazine)" is a standard name used as a disambiguator for titles elsewhere on Wikipedia. Steel1943 (talk) 19:58, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also, for another discussion regarding a disambiguator that mirrors the last word of its title, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 7#Mario (Mario), which resulted in "keep". The nominated redirect BASIC Magazine (magazine) is not problematic, and is a quite valid ((R from unnecessary disambiguation)). Steel1943 (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per similar discussion, which should have been deleted. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:20, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The previous discussion wasn't a slam-dunk or anything, but it's a reasonable precedent. --BDD (talk) 21:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Steel1943 (editor). Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:24, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:30, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Marko Davies → The Lost Boys (franchise)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Daniel Bilmes → List of American artists 1900 and after  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Search term is not included in the list. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Hosni Ebrahim → Hosny Abd Rabo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused and unnecessary redirect. Ben5218 (talk) 16:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 07:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 08:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Aaj Kal → Untitled Imtiaz Ali film  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Meets #10 of WP:RFD#DELETE as there is a film titled Aaj Kal (1934) directed by R. S. Choudhary. Source: List of Bollywood films of 1934, IMDb. Redirect could be possibly made into a new article on that film. Joseph 💬 15:38, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete "Aaj Kal", by itself, is not mentioned in the article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• 3-triphenylmethyl-6-diphenylmethylidene-1,4-cyclohexadiene → Triphenylmethyl radical  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

3-triphenylmethyl-6-diphenylmethylidene-1,4-cyclohexadiene got notability with various names. Historically, 3-triphenylmethyl-6-diphenylmethylidene-1,4-cyclohexadiene(18909-18-7) was misidentifed as hexaphenylethane. There are many source that actually descrive 3-triphenylmethyl-6-diphenylmethylidene-1,4-cyclohexadiene. Standard Korean Language Dictionary contains an article about "헥사페닐에테인"(Hexaphenylethane), which actually descrive chemical properties of 3-triphenylmethyl-6-diphenylmethylidene-1,4-cyclohexadiene with condensed formula of true Hexaphenylethane(17854-07-8). It has other common name such as "Gomberg dimer". There are many English books or paper about "1-diphenylmethylene-4-triphenylmethyl-2,5-cyclohexadiene", "3-triphenylmethyl-6-diphenylmethylidene-1,4-cyclohexadiene" or "Gomberg dimer". 223.38.28.41 (talk) 14:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - before it was redirected, this page read, in its entirety, "3-triphenylmethyl-6-diphenylmethylidene-1,4-cyclohexadiene is a quinoid dimer of Triphenylmethyl radical." Thus the current target seems to be correct, and does describe this molecule in some detail. Until there's a better article than that one-sentence stub, this is the right way to do this. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Make An Article --Sharouser (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The subject is discussed at the target article. I doubt that the topic meets the general notability guideline and therefore doesn't warrant an article itself. Plus, there isn't anything to say about this chemical compound outside the context of triphenylmethyl radical so a single article covering both makes the most sense regardless of the notability issue. ChemNerd (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:31, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Kevin Moffitt → Office Depot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Office Depot makes no mention of this person, making this redirect useless and confusing. Eman235/talk 04:39, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Recommend speedy delete - the author has also asked about deleting his user account on the Teahouse, Section 66, so I don't think he'd object. Orville1974 (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.