< September 6
September 8 >

September 7

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 7, 2019.

Square Enix Ultimate Hits

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 20#Square Enix Ultimate Hits

Legendary Hits

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the targeted article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lauren Orlando

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 20#Lauren Orlando

Ultimate Hits (Square Enix)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 20#Ultimate Hits (Square Enix)

Ultimate Hit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Ultimate Hits. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the targeted article. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Laughing Buddah

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. -- Tavix (talk) 02:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled, should be Laughing Buddha. Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 17:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cellular & Molecular Biology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Obviously, no prejudice against creation of a proper article at this title. –Darkwind (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cellular & Molecular Biology is a legitimate journal. See [1] and [Title+Abbreviation].

The OMICS journal is Cellular & Molecular Medicine: Open Access, not this one. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:57, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This would depend on the journal scores for notability, but if it passes that, there should be no objection to create article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:58, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Globalize subpages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by Primefac per TfD. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 19:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Country specific subpages which used to transclude a tag with the country field pre-filled. This is no longer the case after they were merged with the main template, which now can handle name variations a lot better (see Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_April_5#Template:Globalize). These redirects are now misleading and should be deleted as they don't do what they're expected to. --Trialpears (talk) 11:45, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to United States Environmental Protection Agency. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 14:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Environmental Protection Agency and EPA, both of which redirect to United States Environmental Protection Agency. Also, we don't usually include both name and abbreviation in a title; as an article title, this would fail WP:CONCISE. Narky Blert (talk) 11:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it should point to anything, it should be United States Environmental Protection Agency not the current target. Narky Blert (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You're absolutely right, I misread the original target. signed, Rosguill talk 15:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Own Bán Gallagher

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. –Darkwind (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While technically similar sounding to Eoghan, "Owen" is a common enough name that anyone looking to anglicize this name (or who had heard it said but not written) would use that spelling. The "One" examples are even less likely. Moreover, these spellings doesn't appear to have ever been used for this subject. signed, Rosguill talk 09:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TPIX

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. An explanation for the redirect was provided (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 03:01, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, a Google search didn't return anything illuminating. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 09:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Medstat

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 29#Medstat

David Gowan

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move per 59.149.124.29. -- Tavix (talk) 01:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD mandated a merge to Tonto Natural Bridge, so now David Gowan redirects there. However we have David Gowan (politician) which should be the primary topic. --Pontificalibus 07:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Yoshio Ishizaka

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 28#Yoshio Ishizaka

Lee Soon-shin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. I was mistaken, withdrawing nomination. (non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 02:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to be an alternate spelling; suggesting deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 07:10, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, this particular spelling and its connection to the admiral is discussed with sources at Korean Broadcasting System#2013 – Lee Soon-shin naming scandal. I am not sure whether it is better to keep it pointing to the current target, retarget it to You Are The Best! as ((R from character)), or even retarget it to the section of the Korea Broadcasting System Article which explains the two uses of the name. But in any case, deletion is not the appropriate outcome here. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 08:42, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:BADFAITH

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 19#Wikipedia:BADFAITH

More