< February 4
February 6 >

February 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 5, 2021.

Noldorin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Two relists later and no other votes have been made. Feel free to start a new discussion if you still feel like this page should be deleted, retargeted, disambiguated, or converted to a soft redirect. (non-admin closure) Aasim (talk) 06:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This seems rather misleading to me, since the term in question is actually only indirectly mentioned within the linked section. Also, it will probably mislead in particular users seeking an article on the pertinent language (in analogy to Sindarin or Eldarin, for instance). Hildeoc (talk) 16:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Automated Dialogue Replacement

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and refine to Dubbing (filmmaking)#ADR/post-sync. Thryduulf (talk) 13:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think this redirect should be deleted. Looking at the source for the target you can see that it explains Dubbing is confused for ADR and that it is not ADR, and that someone noticed that Automated Dialogue Replacement is, for some reason, redirected to the Dubbing page, and tagged it for clarification. This actually backs up what the target page says about it. I don't know why the redirect was made. It COULD also be re-targeted to another page on the subject matter. The thing is, it is not dubbing. Discuss? Bywok! 20:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DiCicco

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 22:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate. Jessica DiCicco is the only person with this exact spelling of this surname, but the title could also refer to Dennis di Cicco or 3841 Dicicco, as well as a plausible misspelling for De Cicco v. Schweizer, the pasta brand De Cecco, the DeCicco Building, and any of the names at Di Cecco or De Cecco (surname). Possibly others I didn't come across. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 19:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Concussion substitute

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was set indexify. -- Tavix (talk) 20:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete to encourage article creation. A general article for concussion substitutions in sports could be created, as it's used in many sports (cricket, football, rugby as a head injury replacement). Current setup of redirecting to cricket article is too specific Joseph2302 (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trump terrorist attack

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus for Trump insurrection and Trump coup attempt, and delete Trump terrorist attack, Attempted assassination of Nancy Pelosi, and Attempted assassination of Mike Pence. While recognizing that it is not a vote, I made a table to help keep all of the differing opinions somewhat more organized. I do note there are some nuance with these as some editors have labeled their recommendations as weak or strong:
Redirect Keep Neutral Delete
Trump terrorist attack 2 0 17
Trump insurrection 8 2 9
Trump coup attempt 8 2 9
Attempted assassination of Nancy Pelosi 0 0 19
Attempted assassination of Mike Pence 1 0 18

Participants are roughly split on Trump insurrection and Trump coup attempt. Personally, I found the "keep" arguments for those two a bit stronger, especially those that showed usage in reliable sources in order to meet WP:RNEUTRAL, but I don't think it's enough of a difference to call a full "keep". Finally, thank you to everyone for staying relatively civil in a evenly-divided discussion regarding recent political events. -- Tavix (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:R#DELETE #3. These redirects are clearly intended to be inflammatory, are not established terms, and are possibly WP:BLP violations. Trump insurrection might be acceptable per WP:RNEUTRAL as it's arguably an established term. ― Tartan357 Talk 02:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thryduulf, that cannot be the sole reason for deletion, but WP:RNEUTRAL allows for non-neutral redirects that aren't established terms to be deleted if they meet WP:R#DELETE #3. These likely meet WP:R#DELETE #3 (which is where the "far too inflammatory" component is coming from), so the question is whether they are established terms, which would allow them to be kept per WP:RNEUTRAL. Some might be. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"stats show they are being used" – Hm... I don't think so. I failed to find a page with lower numbers than these three. For example, I compared them with rather obscure pages like Foosball and Nocturnal Vigilantism or Foosackly's – even these pages are roughly ten times more popular than the "Trump ..." redirects. — Chrisahn (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oiyarbepsy, are you sure about "Trump terrorist attack"? That one doesn't appear in any RS as far as I can tell, unlike the other two. Per WP:TERRORIST, the bar for us implying someone is a terrorist needs to be quite high. This phrase seems to suggest Trump himself committed an act of terrorism. ― Tartan357 Talk 02:48, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I be willing to consider deleting the Trump Terrorist one, but my quick search found a decent number of sources using it. I almost wonder if we need to split this one and relist. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Oiyarbepsy: I didn't find any relevant sources using the term "Trump terrorist attack". I found two opinion pieces using "Trump's terrorist attack": [5] may be a WP:RS, [6] (also published at [7]) probably isn't a WP:RS. Michael Moore used the term in a Facebook video, but it looks like no WP:RS picked it up. Did you find any other sources? — Chrisahn (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BDD: Did you mean to vote weak keep for "Attempted assassination of Mike Pence"? Your vote seems to contradict your explanation. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you. Corrected. --BDD (talk) 16:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There appears to be a consensus to delete the "Attempted assassination" redirects, but the others don't have a firm consensus yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you're probably right that it's too late to fix this now. And I almost agree with your assessment of the current state of the debate. Except for "Trump terrorist attack": I just looked through the comments again, and I think there's consensus for deleting it. If I'm not mistaken, you're basically the only person who really !voted for keeping it. Sorry! — Chrisahn (talk) 03:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have any arguments for "Trump insurrection" and "Trump coup attempt" being "ridiculous", specifically? That would be helpful, as strong arguments in favour of those two have already been made in the discussion above, based on both pageviews and use in coverage. Lennart97 (talk) 16:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@BeanieFan11: That these redirects are not neutral is not problematic if they represent terms used to find the neutral content at the target (see WP:RNEUTRAL). In this case, there is plenty of evidence presented above that the redirects starting with "Trump" meet this requirement. Thryduulf (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dragonspine Mountains

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Faerûn, sort of an WP:NCRET. There's no consensus to consider the Genshin Impact usage when it's not mentioned, but the D&D (i.e., Forgotten Realms) mention is now at Faerûn. The status quo of treating this (only) as a D&D term continues. --BDD (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonspine is also a mountainous region in Genshin Impact, so this redirect should be disambiguated. Aasim (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Forgotten Realms version of "Dragonspine Mountains" now does appear in the Faerûn article. Seeing that the few pages that currently use the redirect refer to the Forgotten Realms version, I would tend to keep the original Dragonspine Mountains for the Forgotten Realms version, and rather use a hatnote and create new Dragonspine Mountains (Genshin Impact). Except if there is any evidence the Gensihn Impact version is more prominent in some way. Daranios (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 19:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kung Fuzi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Never mind, it is a plausible misspelling of an alt name. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 18:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. Seems to be an attempt at humor. Onel5969 TT me 18:49, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

May 5, 2020

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Portal:Current events/2020 May 5. signed, Rosguill talk 19:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I find it difficult to fathom that this is the only notable (or semi-notable) event which happened on this particular date. Onel5969 TT me 18:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Party Party (Netherlands)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#The Party Party (Netherlands)

Baraque

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems as likely to be a misspelling of Barque as Baroque, I think that deletion is appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 17:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rikuto

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 13:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, doesn't appear to be a transliteration of the Chinese name. Rikuto is also a Japanese given name, for which we have one notable entry Rikuto Hirose, and several more mentions in other articles. I think that deletion to allow for uninhibited search results is appropriate unless a justification for the current target can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

IDGAF (Calvin Goldspink song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be deleted. The song has no mention anywhere on the Wiki and the artist is only mentioned on a band page. -- Fyrael (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

70/11/12

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pink Floyd bootleg recordings. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable date and not mentioned in detail at the target, be it 12 November 1970 or 11 December 1970: there is no major event linked for either of these dates at the target. It originally pointed to Pink Floyd bootleg recordings, where it is listed as an alternative name of "Copenhagen Sequence", but that too does not have its own article or any other indication of notability, so there would be little information at that target as well. I propose deletion. ComplexRational (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

12st street bart station

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect, and obviously the redirect "12st" does not exist. Also, this redirect is useless, given the fact that it only had less than 100 pageviews between 2015 and 2020. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 14:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

70-11

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a redirect from a vote count in the Philippine parliament to a section of an article on the piece of legislation. I can find no sources at all referring to the vote by this name, and I think this redirect is more likely to confuse readers than to help them. Basically every result I find online is related to tyre sizing 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

TheRafaMarc15 mononym redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was trainwrecked (and withdrawn). Feel free to renominate individually or in small groups. -- Tavix (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There have been a few discussions over the past few days about this user's single-name redirects to ambiguous or incorrect biographies, so I went looking for more. This set is single name redirects to people who are not known by a single name (most are first names but there are several surnames as well), as well as a few that would be more appropriate to retarget the individual who is known by that mononym (the "Ciara" and "Selena" redirects, possibly others). Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 13:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're right about this, I hadn't looked at every entry carefully enough when I voted. Maybe split into three groups: first names with disambiguators (e.g. Julia (Filipina actress, born 1997)); just first names (e.g. Fely); and surnames {e.g. DeLisle)? It might also be wise to single out Joe (president), as this seems to be the only one not related to someone from the entertainment industry. Lennart97 (talk) 14:41, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think we'd want it in smaller groups than that to be honest, probably no more than 4 or 5 to a group. some of these first name ones are fairly well used even though they look implausible. "Ari (singer)" has clocked up 20 page views in the week and a half it's been around for example, so it's clearly a search term people are using. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Green Planet

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Green Planet. signed, Rosguill talk 18:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to disambiguation page Green Planet. The current target is based on an ET novelization sequel called E.T.: The Book of the Green Planet. There's an upcoming BBC nature documentary series with David Attenborough called The Green Planet (see [9], [10] and [11]), so the redirect to ET is no longer justified. Lennart97 (talk) 11:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Relation (OpenStreetMap)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#Relation (OpenStreetMap)

Ashurst (1802 cricketer)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of English cricketers (1787–1825)#A. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Retarget to List of English cricketers (1787–1825)#A, where the person is mentioned, and where Ashurst (MCC cricketer) points at as well. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Frederick Price (cricketer, born 1857)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Does not seem to have a mention on Wikipedia (though we do have Frederic Price (cricketer, born 1852) and Frederic Price (cricketer, born 1840)). Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

S. Taylor (cricketer)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#S. Taylor (cricketer)

L. G. Robertson

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful XNR; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Apart from an unrelated search result at Melbourne Grammar School#Campuses, I could not find any mention on Wikipedia. Delete to encourage article creation, unless an appropriate target can be found. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Comox people/temp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted under G6 -FASTILY 08:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leftovers from page moves; no longer needed. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Annam Tower

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#Annam Tower

Jugend

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#Jugend

More