The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Secret trial. ✗plicit 23:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Secret court → Star Chamber  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. The term is ambiguous (see, for example, FISA Court). I propose deletion, as search results are probably better here. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• retarget to Secret trial -- 65.92.244.249 (talk) 23:50, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm also fine with the proposed new target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Secret trial as plausible synonym per anon. --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Robert Matthew Montgomery → Miami Marlins minor league players#Matthew Montgomery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Montgomery was released from minor league baseball in 2014, so he no longer appears on the target roster page (or anywhere that would be good to target this redirect to). Recommend deletion as the subject is non-notable and there's not a single great target. Hog Farm _Talk 21:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate per SNOW. (non-admin closure) J947 † ^edits 22:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Woodsdale → Woodsdale, Tasmania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There's at least 3 additional towns this search term could refer to (Kansas, North Carolina, Ohio) Hey man im josh (talk) 15:13, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate: Seeing no overwhelming WP:PTOPIC, DABing makes sense. TartarTorte 15:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate; no primary topic. J947 † ^edits 18:45, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate There is no primary topic here. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Dabify per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate. I've provided a draft. Curiously a similar situation applied to Wooddale. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Blang people. Salvio ^giuliano 20:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Bulang → Brown University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. The pages that point to this redirect refer to Bulang as an ethnic group or as an island. Pointing to Brown University doesn't make sense. I think this page is better left as a red link until an appropriate article can be created. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Blang people which gives "Bulang" as an alternate spelling. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:51, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Blang people per Presidentman. --Lenticel ^(talk) 04:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Salvio ^giuliano 09:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Akademitscheski nautschno-isdatelski, proiswodstwenno-poligrafitscheski i knigorasprostranitelski zentr Rossijskoi akademii nauk "Isdatelstwo Nauka" → Nauka (publisher)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Akademitscheski nautschno-isdatelski, proiswodstwenno-poligrafitscheski i knigorasprostranitelski zentr Rossijskoi akademii nauk → Nauka (publisher)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Akademičeskij naučno-izdatel'skij proizvodstvenno-poligrafičeskij i knigorasprostranitel'skij centr RAN Izdatel'stvo "Nauka" → Nauka (publisher)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Akademičeskij naučno-izdatel'skij proizvodstvenno-poligrafičeskij i knigorasprostranitel'skij centr RAN → Nauka (publisher)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete: not mentioned at target, unlikely search term. greyzxq ^talk 22:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This appears to be romanized Russian, which machine-translated as "Academic Research and Publishing, Production and Printing and Book Distribution Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences" [1]. This could refer to the target article, but it is an unlikely search term. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Based on this website, there might be a connection. The publisher is listed as Akademičeskij naučno-izdatel'skij proizvodstvenno-poligrafičeskij I knigorasprostranitel'skij centr RAN Izdatel'stvo "Nauka". (Still, WP:RFOREIGN might still apply.) --Super Goku V (talk) 22:24, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I have merged the 4 discussions into one, as the redirects are related to each other and it's very likely that they'll end with the same result. Randi Moth (talk) 07:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Unclear if these redirects should be deleted or kept...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Different forms of Russian transliteration, all obscenely long, The first two appear to be based on German, which is not appropriate on the English Wikipedia in any case. It is not likely that any user would query for these terms, nor do their Russian Cyrillic equivalents appear in the destination article Nauka (publisher). How is this discussion still open after a week? Fishing Publication (talk) 18:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, while the romanization schemes used here are German, it is a fact that many English-language publications include foreign-style romanizations in their citations due to lack of familiarity with Russian romanization conventions, and primarily-English-speaking readers will often have to rely on bibliographies and databases maintained by German conventions (or other non-English conventions, Finnish and French also having widely-adopted standards) who correctly apply their own romanization conventions. The first two redirects appear to be written Duden-style (naive German), and the second two are either DIN (scientific German) or ISO (French), as the redirects do not use any of the characters that differ between ISO and DIN (see this guide to the various standards). As long as these terms are not ambiguous with any other potential search target (they do not appear to be), they should be kept. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).