The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was restore and nominate at AfD. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Ashraf Abdullah Ahsy → Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now. GSearch says that there are materials to build a section about the prisoners within article. I do have to warn anyone who'll try though. The stories are quite dark.--Lenticel ^(talk) 01:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Restore pre-BLAR revision. It even has an image of the prisoner and the dog during the interrogation. Although NorthBySouthBaranof's edit summary said "Mergify", I didn't find any merge done. Hence I have tagged it as ((R with history)). Jay 💬 07:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm also fine with a Restore, then send to AfD per Jay's findings --Lenticel ^(talk) 12:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Ioan.Church, Mikeatnip, regarding allegations of paid editing, it is a known scam that paid editors will claim affiliation with editors in a deletion discussion and extort money to "prevent the deletion" (which is not something within their power to do). Emails from scammers and any other evidence should be forwarded to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Messianic Noahides → Anabaptism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Messianic Noahide → Anabaptism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I am unsure what this group actually believes or if they in fact exist, but search results suggest something similar to Messianic Judaism and certainly not Anabaptism. Rusalkii (talk) 06:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment same editor created Messianic Hebrew and Messianic Hebrews, which I am retargetting to Messianic Jew with no prejudice against deletion. Rusalkii (talk) 07:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I find very few mentions of this phrase through a WP:BEFORE search and none with enough SIGCOV to define it. There is a movement known as Noahidism, but it doesn't appear to be messianic in nature. Certainly, there is nothing to suggest a link to Anabaptism. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this doesn't seem like an accurate description of Anabaptism, and it's neither a commonly used term nor does it have a clear meaning. Kk.urban (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep about 2 years ago I started research into Messianic Hebrews because I had also assumed that they were the same as Messianic Jews but it turned out that the Messianic Hebrews denounce Messianic Jews as a "Synagogue of Satan" and instead promote something called "Messianic Noahide Judaism". Upon research into that religion it turns out that it was founded along Anabaptist lines by Baptist Ministers in 2003 and that the modern day non-Messianic Noahide movement split from it in 2005. Since they are too small for their own article it seemed best to simple redirect it to the religion which it is based on at least until there is enough data to build a good article on the topic. Ioan.Church (talk) 18:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you happen to have any source on hand for that? Could be helpful to add a section to Anabaptism about it. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:56, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only from what is published by the Messianic Noahide groups themselves which one can find when one does a Google search for "Messianic Noahide". The biggest group only has 2180 members and runs a YouTube channel. There are a handful of books which. ention Messianic Noahides only enough for a stub article to be written so I thought it would be best to redirect it rather than write a stub but if people want the redirect to be deleted then the best option is for the stub to be written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ioan.Church (talk • contribs) 23:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...In that case, I'd say that they aren't notable-- information published by the Noahides themselves do not count as reliable secondary sources. In this case, I support deletion. If you really do feel like they deserve a section or article, and can find enough sources to support it, WP:REDLINK applies, with perhaps a little jolt of WP:BOLD. Although if I may add, 2k members doesn't seem notable enough for a youtube channel, much less a religious sect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 23:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should bare in mind that Anabaptists (with the exception of the Mennonites) are a collection of minority groups so 2000+ and a YouTube channel and website is notable considering the Dunkards (who get more mention on Wikipedia) have only just over 1000 members and do not have their own website. Ioan.Church (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, fair enough as to the numbers- a single person can be notable enough for Wikipedia, after all. What makes something notable is the sources, not the concept/number of people/ect, as per WP:N. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 09:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: This is misleading and confusing; the article for Messianic Noahide should be nominated for deletion as well (or incorporated into this discussion). Kind regards, Anupam^Talk 16:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled Messianic Noahide with this.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Strong delete, for that matter. I have several hundred books on Anabaptist history and have never even seen Messianic Noahides mentioned once, that I can remember, in any of them. Mikeatnip (talk) 12:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Mike and Anupam have a proven Conflict of interest working for an Indian Wikipedia article making company and have mindless prejudice and a history of working together and lying to try and get their way on Wikipedia. For example. The username Mike Atnip is not his rea name but he uses it for articles on Anabaptism because it looks like the name of a famous Anabaptist Public Figure who he is impersonating. The other Indian named accounts which support him are part of the same company. I have been contacted, I will not state by whom but I have been contacted by such a company who "noticed" that I was having difficulty getting sourced references into an article which is "owned" by those two and their paid admin. Support staff. So I won't bother getting into any edit war with such people who will only accuse you of being the one who is edit warring after they get their stooges to create the fake illusion of an edit war. I won't tarnish my good name on Wikipedia messing around with them. The Internet makes very clear that Messianic Noahides and Messianic Hebrews are the same thing and that they are very strongly opposed to Messianic Jews and that they have their origin in Anabaptim. There is no need for a sham Wikipedia discussion on notability by actors for a company who have turned Wikipedia into a business platform. The truth is obvious anyway with not Wikipedia. If however there are any legitimate Wikipedia s left who are willing to do a Google search for "Messianic noahides" it is easy to find out 1 that they exist and 2 that they are also known as Messianic Hebrews 3 that they are Anabaptists 4 that they oppose Messianic Jewsto be a "Synagogue of Satan". But since there are no reliable peer reviewed articles on the group then there should be no article under the name. Therefore the best solution is a Redirect until such time that there are more published sources on the topic. Logical reasoning always overrules concensus. Fake concensus is always easy to achieve when there is a company behind you. Comments from those whose edit history shows vendetta and prejudice should be struck through. Ioan.Church (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  (@_@) Holy crap, that's some heavy WP:MEAT / Wikipedia:PAY accusation. If true, that's grounds to get Mike blocked, not simply ammunition for an RfD... Are you sure RfD is the right venue for this??? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 19:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The accusations about who I am and my supposed paid interests have occasioned a good laugh for the day. That is about all they are good for, anyways. :-) Mikeatnip (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Priya Thakur and Red Line, Keep the rest. Jay 💬 09:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bibhuti Bhushan metro station → Kolkata Metro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Loknath metro station → Kolkata Metro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Mother Teresa metro station → Kolkata Metro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Priya Thakur metro station → Kolkata Metro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Swami Vivekananda metro station → Kolkata Metro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Sri Ramkrishna metro station → Kolkata Metro Line 1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Jibananda metro station → Kolkata Metro Line 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Maulana Abul Kalam Azad metro station → Kolkata Metro Line 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Red Line (Kolkata Metro) → Kolkata Metro Line 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Kolkata Metro often uses names of cultural leaders, social workers, and freedom fighters in naming its metro stations. These 8 metro stations, however, neither exist nor would you find any reference about them on the web, except Wikipedia mirror sites. Many of these redirects had started as standalone articles, but they were fully unreferenced. These names were mentioned in the main Kolkata Metro article as far back as 2011 (later removed, but retained in templates), however, the only surviving reference from the time (archived) does not mention these names at all. It is very likely that these names were made up and had not actually been given to these metro stations.

Red Line did not ever exist on Kolkata Metro. Creator was deoablock-ed. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I personally see insufficient evidence being put forth for such a claim. The non-existence of sources in English does not imply that these stations do not exist, just that they are non-notable at present. Sohom (talk) 22:10, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Neither the map nor the expansion plan on the official website seem to have mentioned these names. As I mentioned above, all of these were being used as aliases to other already named stations on the main article (reverted soon), but while it was still there, made its way to Template:Kolkata Metro (where it was not reverted for quite a long time). For instance, Swami Vivekananda metro station was used in place of Baranagar metro station (real name). All the rest were being used for stations on "Noapara-Barasat Metro" line (Line 4, yellow). However, no official or secondary sources have ever used these names, raising questions on credibility. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 04:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @CX Zoom (please ping on reply) I'm still unable to follow how you make the conclusion that these station names are a hoax. Doing a basic Google search, Swami Vivekananda metro station is definitely Baranagar metro station per [1]. Mother Teresa metro station also will exist per [2]. Sri Ramkrishna metro station will exist (per that same source). Maulana Abul Kalam Azad metro station also will exist as per [3]. Suffice to say, I'm skeptical of your claim here. Sohom (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @Sohom Datta: I don't know, I was unable to find a relevant source by Google search or even filtering by news, I'm still unable to. It just shows up several random news articles.
  Since there are now sources that sufficiently prove that these were the intended names initially but have been superceded later, I am inclined to withdraw my request, except Priya Thakur metro station because it isn't mentioned in any source. Source 2 & 3 do mention P. R. Thakur in its stead, which must refer to Pramatha Ranjan Thakur, as the article clearly talk of the Matua community leader.
  Also, as you were able to find sources for these, can you search about Red Line (Kolkata Metro) also, so we can decide if it needs deletion, as it doesn't exist as far as I could search. Thanks! —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 21:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I agree Priya Thakur metro station and Red Line (Kolkata Metro) should be deleted. Kolkata metro doesn't appear to have a Red line. I did a bit digging and the most probable explanation for this is that the line is denoted in red in certain official documents, due to it's unfinished status. (Yay! to confusing government documentation). Sohom (talk) 22:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:09, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:47, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus — no quorum. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Jyotindra Nath Nandi metro station → Kolkata Metro Line 6  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Yuva Bharati Kirangan metro station → Kolkata Metro  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Should have been deleted under WP:CSD G8. Created in obvious error. Misspelling of "Jyotirindra Nath Nandi metro station" and "Yuva Bharati Krirangan metro station" respectively. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget Jyotindra Nath Nandi metro station to Jyotirindra Nandi metro station as a plausible misspelling. Delete Yuva Bharati Kirangan metro station, which does not appear to be mentioned on enwiki for either spelling. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "Yuva Bharati Krirangan" is an alternative name for Salt Lake Stadium, and therefore can be used for Salt Lake Stadium metro station although no one uses it. In both cases though, I do not think it is a plausible misspelling. Search function should be sufficient for such cases. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 14:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "Jyotindra Nath Nandi metro station" seems to get used relatively frequently based on pageviews. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That is probably because the Template:Kolkata Metro route diagram had the wrong spelling until I fixed it hours before the nomination: [4]. I suspect all of the views came from Kolkata Metro which displays the route diagram. The views are too few to log onto clickstream data though. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 19:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:45, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 07:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• MIIW → Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II (2022 video game)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely alternative name for MW2. Appears to just be a joke name based on the logo. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 04:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: The logo does indeed look like MIIW, unsure why it would be a joke? Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is the game logo, thus a viable search term -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 04:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Utopes and IP Editor. Typing what the logo looks like into the search bar is far from unlikely. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 07:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Rito Games → Riot Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible typo of Riot Games with only 1 page view in the last 90 days StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 03:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. I remember this being the preferred misspelling for Riot Games by fans of League of Legends. A little crufty, but harmless. ― Synpath 03:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as an ((R from meme)), not ((R from typo)). Upon research, this is a meme among League players that eventually was even referenced by Riot themselves. Anyone typing this in probably did so intentionally. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep single character transposition of adjacent characters is a highly plausible typo -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 04:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You've got to have a dream if you don't have a dream how you gonna make your dream come true? → Happy Talk (song)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A very specific lyric from a recently created redirect that is not mentioned at the target article, and does not appear to be a likely search term. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:UNNATURAL search term StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 04:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unlikely search term. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 07:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• La di da di da, slob on me knob → King's Dead  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A highly specific lyric from this song that is not mentioned at the target. With the la di das, I don't expect this to be a likely search term, and Wikipedia is not a lyric database. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 07:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hands on my knees, shakin' ass, on my thot shit → Thot Shit  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A Megan Thee Stallion lyric not mentioned at the target article. After typing in specific commas and apostrophes, only for no information about this, makes this title unhelpful and unlikely, as Wikipedia has never been a lyric database. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:42, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:UNNATURAL StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 03:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Technically no consensus, but everyone in this discussion seems to agree that the current target is not desirable. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Manae → List of generation IV Pokémon#Mime Jr.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

implausible misspelling(?) of its japanese name, manene. also unlikely speculation, as it was also named in gen 3. results only showed an in-game trainer and an anime production staff member with this name cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 12:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or weak retarget. The top results all relate to some non-notable tiktokers/youtubers, Inanidrilus manae - longstanding consensus has repeatedly been that redirects from specific names are not useful, so I don't support targetting it here; and Manaé Feleu, a French rugby union player but I can't find any evidence that she's commonly referred to by her first name alone (searching for Manae rugby -Feleu finds only places where her surname has been misspelled) so while I don't oppose retargetting it here it's not my first choice. Thryduulf (talk) 12:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate per Thryduulf's findings. Steel1943 (talk) 20:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:16, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate: Probably no harm in disambiguating to the articles Thryduulf dug up. Apparently it actually is a given name in Japan as well (quite a few people out there with that name as well), could be argued as futureproofing or something? idk. But the current target of Mime Jr. really isn't useful. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 20:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Thryduulf. Search will help better. Jay 💬 05:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate: I concur with the reasoning displayed by HotMess. CaptainGalaxy 17:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Any disambiguation page would be entirely PTMs. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Moot. The redirect was not tagged for RfD, and was converted to a standalone article in the meantime. Jay 💬 07:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Adıyaman FK → Adıyamanspor  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete it as confusing. It's mainly used in another club's seasonal articles [5], while redirecting to the current target [6]. Respublik (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).