The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• MT25i → Sony Xperia neo L  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"MT25i" not mentioned at the target. The letters "MT" are never said together, and the number "25" is not present anywhere at the page. This may be a model number, but it's unclear how useful of a redirect this is as the title is never mentioned as a synonym. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MT25i is the model number of Sony Xperia neo L. S03311251 (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This appears to be a ((R from EXIF)). Thryduulf (talk) 04:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, it is in, for example, the EXIF of File:Lacatan_banana_hong_kong_aeon.jpg. S03311251 (talk) 15:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It’s the serial number of the phone. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 15:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I'ma Chargin Mah Lazer → Dragon Ball Z  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Related mem; not mentioned in page or anywhere else on wikipedia. Rusalkii (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove:clearly unrelated and not appropiate.--ReyHahn (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - IIRC, this meme phrase was put over a (large?) number of different videos and gifs from multiple franchises (my memory says kirby, freespace, and more). If we don't have an article on the meme itself due to lack of notability, then this meme has no real unambiguous target, and should be removed. Fieari (talk) 07:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete IIRC, the original meme featured Cell from Dragon Ball Z. That said, that's not saying we should keep, I otherwise fully agree with you, nom, and ReyHahn. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Pierre Connes → Janine Connes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are about 6 articles linking to Pierre Connes, the problem is that the article currently leads to Janine Connes, his wife. It would be better to either take the time to create the article (I am not up to it), or just delete the redirect so that the red link appears. An ((ill)) template has been put in place in the concerning articles if the redirect gets deleted. ReyHahn (talk) 22:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per WP:REDLINK. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Steelmate → Stalemate  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Search results are various companies non of which are mentioned onwiki. Unlikely & confusing error. Rusalkii (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can imagine someone unfamiliar with the Geordie accent mishearing "stalemate" spoken in that accent as "steelmate", but we can't cater for every possible error of this type. To borrow the language used in discussions of WP:RFOREIGN redirects, the subject has no particular affinity to the north east of England so that doesn't provide a basis to keep this redirect and I can't find any other. Thryduulf (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Noting that I have seen Lunamann's edit to my comment, and while they were correct in that I did mean "no affinity" (rather than "affinity"), I do not endorse the editing of my comment. Thryduulf (talk) 16:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    ...yeah, that... that was my bad, I'm sorry. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Black Scrubs → Christopher Turk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Search results are entirely for black scrubs (clothing). Rusalkii (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Target is... a black character from Scrubs (TV series)? ...That's not enough to support the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Character does not appear to be referred to as black scrubs. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Surikiña → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Suriquiña → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Suriquina → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Laguna Suriquiña → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Laguna Suriquina → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Lake Suriquiña → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Lake Suriquina → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Surikina → Taypi Chaka Quta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 16#Lake Surikiña, closed as delete, (and I aplogise for not bundling these together at that time). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would Template:Db-xfd apply here? Consensus has already established that there's no info on this lake; might not need to go through song and dance for another week if it's avoidable. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per previous consensus. I fail to see how any of these are any different from the one we just deleted. I'll also note that save for Surikina, which was made by a bot to redirect to Surikiña and then immediately avoided-double-redirect by a second bot, every single one of these redirects were made on the same day by the same author. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HOLD ON WAIT. THAT WASN'T IMMEDIATE. HISTORY DIIIIVE
--Okay, so, Surikiña was actually made first to be a dab page between three pages that... are redlinks (Surikiña, Bolivia; Surikiña River; and Lake Surikiña, which at the time was actually a circular redirect), NONE of which were Taypi Chaka Quta. All of the others were originally made as redirects pointing to this dab page. This existed for 11 years, before it was BLAR'd to Taypi Chaka Quta with the explanation as to why being... WP:PRIMARYRED?? Which also doesn't explain why Taypi Chaka Quta was chosen as the target, given-- as noted in the RfD discussion for Lake Surikiña-- Taypi Chaka Quta is NOT Lake Surikiña. The others were then scooped up by a bot and avoided-double-redirected as a group to Taypi Chaka Quta.

...This doesn't really change my recommendation; the old DAB page was nothing but redlinks, that's not enough to support the DAB. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 18:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Chaos muppet → Dahlia Lithwick#Career  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Order muppet → Dahlia Lithwick#Career  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target article. Originally was a redirect to Muppet Theory, which was BLAR'd as a non-notable neologism, leaving this redirect without a home and undiscussed at the current target page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete muppet as per nom. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. TarnishedPath^talk 12:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Curious but non-notable. XMcan (talk) 17:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Roguevania → Roguelike#Growth of the rogue-lite (2005–onward)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Roguevania is not mentioned anywhere at the target page, although the concept does receive a smatter of mentions across different other games' articles. Only usage of "vania" is talking about Deadcells being a roguelike / metroidvania, but not a combination of these two terms. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Soulsvania → Metroidvania#Soulsvania  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A game-genre neologism which is not mentioned at the target article. Is only mentioned once on Wikipedia (but would likely be inappropriate to redirect a concept to one usage of such concept). Dark Souls is mentioned as being "loosely considered a Metroidvania", and Soulslike is listed in the see also section. However, the subsection that this redirect was initially pointed to no longer exists, so it does not seem as if this redirect has a great use anymore if the concept is not discussed anywhere else. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• DNA Lover → TV Chosun#Dramas  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Allegedly a TV drama, which is not listed at the target article, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. We have no content for this topic. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Twenty-Five Years' War → Russo-Swedish War (1590–1595)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This war was not 25 years. This title does not appear anywhere at the target page, and is confusable with The 25 Year War. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It looks like the phrase probably originated with this article. There is a Russian Twenty-five Years' War which redirects to Livonian War, whose dates more closely align with those given in the article. Still, neither term doesn't appear to be a commonly-used synonym. (Most of the Google hits seem to be random instances where "twenty-five years" and "war" appear close together). There doesn't seem to be enough here to warrant keeping the redirect. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The title refers to Russo-Swedish wars fought in 1570-1595, see fi:Pitkä viha. In English-language sources they may be referred to as "Nordic/Northern 25 Years' War". Without a specifier the title is ambiguous. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Further comment on the relationship between the Livonian War (1558–1583) and the "25 Years' War" (1570-1595) which may appear confusing. The Livonian War features prominently in Russian historiography since it lead to a loss of territory. The "25 Years' War", or the Long Wrath [fi] as it is called in Finnish historiography, overlaps with the Livonian War, but puts more emphasis on the guerrilla warfare in the Finnish front, which continued even after 1583. Based on this pdf such term is absent from the Russian historiography. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Marching Band (band) → Marching Band (duo)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I've been getting very tripped-up with this redirect, but I feel this title can easily (and more likely) be used for Marching band, which is, by nature, a band. The page for Marching band has the disambiguation page linked to access other uses. But technically speaking, a marching band is still a band. (This reminds me of the Climber (climbing) situation...) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:DIFFCAPS. The duo is the only musical group the on the disambiguation page, and the term would be a WP:PTM for any article about an individual marching band. If we need to provide more clarity, we could add a hatnote pointing to the List of marching bands on the article about the duo. - Eureka Lott 20:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  For what it's worth about the diffcaps, Marching Band is also a redirect to Marching band. With that in mind it seems as if Marching Band (band) and Marching band (band) would hypothetically be on a level playing field, if the two (band)less versions are currently considered the same, I'd think. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is the only article we have about a band called "Marching Band". Thryduulf (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Killdren → Tory scum  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This is a group that used to be, but is no longer mentioned at the target article, and not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Currently unhelpful redirect as we don't have any material on this subject. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Redirect (Before it Deletes You) as per WP:REDLINK. As noted by the older version(s) of the article that mention Killdren, this is the name of a British electronic punk band, whose only link to this article is that they have a song titled "Kill Tory Scum (Before They Kill You)". That's not really enough to support anything at all-- not the reference being kept in the article, and not the redirect. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was wrong venue. Per the instructions, if you want to move a page but a redirect is in the way, do not list it here. Place a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Thryduulf (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2020–2023 global chip shortage → 2020–2023 Global chip shortage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect should be deleted so its target article can be moved back under its title. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• SOUND OF BERBERIA → Tarik El Idrissi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely search term, not mentioned with this stylization at the target article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now. May be recreated when we have useful content at some article. Jay 💬 15:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• VGA (dis) → VGA (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Improper disambiguation redirect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RDEL#D8. It should have been speedied under WP:A10 in November instead of being converted to a redirect. - Eureka Lott 19:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. "Dis" is not a common abbreviation for "disambiguation". Thryduulf (talk) 19:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Del as per Eur and Thry. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Christian People's Party of Saarland → Christian People's Party (Germany)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect went to a different party (that in turn was an early name for yet another party in a WP:FORK). An article is possible, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Christliche Volkspartei des Saarlandes → Christian People's Party (Germany)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Redirect went to a different party (that in turn was an early name for yet another party in a WP:FORK). An article is possible, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Budweiser#Marketing. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bud Man → Anheuser-Busch  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in redirected article. GnocchiFan (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Budweiser#Marketing. It would be more appropriate to redirect to the drink that the mascot ("Bud Man") is advertising, rather than the company that produces the drink. Also the Marketing section contains some information on this mascot. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 10:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget as per GoldenBootWizard. Nice find! 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 2024 conspiracy theories, speculation and controversy surrounding the health, period of convalescence, public absence and Mother's Day photograph of Catherine, Princess of Wales; or, Where is Kate? (Kategate) → Where is Kate?  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

this title is way too long for a redirect, thank you Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as an implausible search term, created from a humorous alternative title suggestion at the target talk page. See also the redirect 2023 Mother's Day photograph by Catherine, Princess of Wales, created by the same user. IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 13:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the above. – GnocchiFan (talk) 18:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Simply being long is not a reason to delete, but it being an implausible amalgam of several titles is. Thryduulf (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Haha. Admittedly very funny, but delete. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, and as an implausible and unlikely search term. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 22:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails to include "also known as Kate Middleton". BD2412 T 13:16, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, or rather douse with Fossil fuel for reciprocating piston engines equipped with spark plugs and set on fire. Nickps (talk) 03:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Vos iz dos → Klezmer  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

"Voz is dos" is "what is it?" in Yiddish. There is a Yiddish song with this title, not mentioned in the target article. Article about the song can be created, so WP:R#DELETE #10. Викидим (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the above. – GnocchiFan (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 13:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Revenge of the Baby-Sat! → List of Calvin and Hobbes books  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The exclamation mark at the end appears to be not used by Watterson. Revenge of the Baby-Sat is already present as a redirect. Most likely, a typo by the editor. Викидим (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It's a plausible error, especially as multiple other books/stories in the series do end with exclamation marks. Thryduulf (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Very plausible error. Easy to remember the names of the books, not so easy to remember the presence of punctuation or not. Fieari (talk) 01:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Aquariub → Calvin and Hobbes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misspelling reflecting mispronunciation by Calvin in a single strip of the comics. Calvin wears a snorkeling mask with water in it. Highly improbable to occur in internet searches for Calvin and Hobbes. Викидим (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. Fieari (talk) 01:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Moving drafted disambiguation page to Kansas City shooting (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Kansas City shooting → 2024 Kansas City parade shooting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect should be deleted mainly because as was said last time, shootings in Kansas City are frequent, including one literally today. The Super Bowl parade shooting IMO should just be merged into Super Bowl LVIII#Aftermath because gun violence is an everyday occurance in America and one fatality is not notable enough for an article, but I digress. In any case, this is clearly not the most notable shooting of the name, and it being so high in the search results and not the Kansas City massacre is clearly WP:RECENTISM. 134.6.74.198 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I understand an RM is underway for this article, but that being said, I feel that that shouldn’t impact this given how this is not a suggested name (I don’t think) and there have been RMs for this article since the day it happened. --134.6.74.198 (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The last discussion closed just two weeks ago, and there was strong consensus to keep. I find it highly unlikely that consensus has changed in such a short timeframe. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak disambig A very rough search suggests that about half the current google results for "Kansas city shooting" are for the 2024 parade shooting. (Compare a search for "Kansas city shooting" and "Kansas city shooting" -parade -"Super Bowl". This seems suggestive that it's the primary topic, given that the remaining half is divided up between several different topics, but not overwhelming. Other shootings that have pages that might be referred to as such include Shooting of Ralph Yarl, Overland Park Jewish Community Center shooting, and the above-mentioned Kansas City massacre. I would support creating a disambig page and targeting there, but in the absence of such a page this target seems more helpful than deletion. That being said, re-opening discussion so soon after previous discussion closed seems to be in bad form. Rusalkii (talk) 04:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reply - Agree that "re-opening discussion so soon after previous discussion closed seems to be in bad form". --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:TROUT nom for reopening discussions so soon, then either Keep as per previous discussions, or Dabify as per Rusalkii. (For the record, I'm leaning towards Keep, as it's the result of the previous discussion.) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and trout - Right on! --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as far as I can tell nothing has changed in the last 2 weeks. Thryduulf (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Right on! --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Dabify as per Rusalkii. This knee-jerk redirect is obviously nonsense, as the nominator said. — Smuckola(talk) 14:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The discussion two weeks ago presented evidence that showed this is not nonsense. What has changed since then to make it "obviously nonsense" now? Thryduulf (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong dabify. More than one Kansas City shooting. In fact, there've been hundreds of shootings; while we might not have articles for all of the hundreds, the ones we do have articles for still fare pretty highly pageview wise, and regularly contend with 2024 event even with its WP:RECENTISM bonus. [1] Redirecting this umbrella term for one shooting in an entire major city is wholly unhelpful and obscures the other notable shootings that people may have been searching for. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Category:Crime in Kansas City, Missouri (since Category:Shootings in Kansas City, Missouri doesn't exist), following the same principle as disambiguating, as ambiguous with numerous other events. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 19:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would it really be helpful to send readers looking for encyclopedic content, to an unfamiliar page such as a category? This would be a deviation from the norm of, say, Chicago shooting or Nashville shooting among multiple others. The category can be linked from the hypothetical DAB if it needs to. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose this - we have an article on the exact event the significant majority of people are going to be looking for (the current target, yes it's recent but that doesn't mean it's not the primary topic) that has a hatnote to the event most other people are going to be looking for. Retargetting to a category that is much broader and which doesn't help people who don't know that the Kansas City massacre was a shooting is actively unhelpful. Thryduulf (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: I've drafted a disambig page at the target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is a disambiguation draft at the redirect page now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I have just checked again, and it is even more clear that the current target is the primary topic now than it was when this was last discussed - 100% of the results on the first five pages of my google search are about the 2024 event. The draft dab should be at Kansas City shooting (disambiguation). Thryduulf (talk) 12:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The #1 result I get now is this, and then this - two unrelated shootings. Yes, this is a significant shooting but it’s obvious it will not be the primary Kansas City shooting long term. Ten years from now, this will not be seen as the primary KC shooting. 24.89.159.222 (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, Hatnote to Disambiguation - It really does seem the 2024 shooting is the main topic here, but it might not always be the main topic... and clearly it wasn't always the main topic previously, so searching based on historical references might be misleading. Because it's the main topic RIGHT NOW, the redirect should probably stay where it is, but there should be a hatnote pointing to a separate disambiguation page. Fieari (talk) 01:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget COPS, keep the others. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Cops episodes → Cops (TV program)#Episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of COPS episodes → COPS (animated TV series)#Episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of C.O.P.S. episodes → COPS (animated TV series)#Episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I know we just had a discussion for List of Cops episodes (and I participated in the respective discussion), but I made my comment in that discussion prior to noticing the existence of List of COPS episodes. The problem here is that WP:SMALLDETAILS probably does not differentiate the two topics enough, given that Cops (TV program) can be stylized as "COPS" and COPS (animated TV series) is apparently stylized as "C.O.P.S.". In addition, at Cop#Television, there are additional TV show/program subjects listed which include an inline list of episodes. So, with all that said, I'm not sure what is the best path here. (I've also added List of C.O.P.S. episodes for completion of this nomination so others know of its existence, but I'm "weak keep" on that per my previous statement about the "C.O.P.S." stylization; either way, List of C.O.P.S. episodes is a ((R with history)).) Steel1943 (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Disambiguate with hatnotes at the target sections. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:02, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for a stronger consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nominator comment: At the minimum, I think List of COPS episodes should be retargeted to Cops (TV program)#Episodes per the "COPS" confusion and since the show with 30+ seasons is significantly more notable than a show which aired for one season almost 40 years ago. Steel1943 (talk) 04:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to dab page. Create a list of episode redirect for each series using their main article title and disambiguation. Gonnym (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget the COPS one to Cops (TV program)#Episodes, keep the others: per Steel1943, and maybe disambiguate with ((redirect)) hatnotes in those sections in the articles 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 23:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all per Shhh and hatnote (which I have already done). I would see "List of COPS episodes" with only the COPS capitalized going to the COPS animated series. Jay 💬 17:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Begrudgingly Retarget COPS to Cops (TV program)#Episodes and keep the other two. I think Cops (TV program) is wrongly titled and should be further disambiguated, but the community though differently in 2018 and the episode list titles should follow the main titles (Cops (TV series)/COPS (TV series)/C.O.P.S.). * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It is not clear what you are suggesting with should be further disambiguated, but the TV program was titled with caps earlier (see Talk:Cops (TV program)/Archive 1#Why is this article titled COPS (TV series) instead of Cops (TV series)?), and was moved to the lowercase by RHaworth in 2012, probably boldly. However, after going through the discussions, and leaning towards to stylization, I see merit in nom's minimum requirement of list of COPS going to Cops, hence striking off my vote. Jay 💬 05:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I think Cops (TV program) should be moved to Cops (1989 TV program), with Cops (TV program) and Cops (TV series) and COPS (TV series) going to Cop#Television. If that was done I would support targeting the first three redirects to Cop#Television as well. I also know that that move proposal won't get consensus, so am just ranting about it here rather than actually filing a RM. In the mean time, though, my initial logic applies. And I've fixed the link above. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:32, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on Pppery's suggestion?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G6 Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Gillanwali (Dera Baba Nanak)) → Gillanwali (Dera Baba Nanak)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely extra trailing parenthetical, at this title for under an hour. Rusalkii (talk) 04:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per G6; a redirect left behind from moving a page which was created at an incorrect title. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:55, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Inecraft → Minecraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Mnecraft → Minecraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Miecraft → Minecraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Minecaft → Minecraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Minecrft → Minecraft  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Following the closure of the Minecrat RfD with a deletion result, the last and WP:POINTiest outcome of that discussion I'd expect to see is the mass creation of all other variations of this deleted redirect. Creating redirects for every typo-instance of a word pre-emptively, especially a week after the deletion of the last one, is not useful. Minecraft is not hard to spell; these redirects don't provide any benefit besides clogging technical pages (not a benefit). Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, then WP:TROUT user:I am RedoStone. Minecraft is a great game, that gives you the ability to build anything and also make your player character look like anyone using skins. That said, this build and this skin do not go together.
I'm not entirely certain how applicable that actually is, but couldn't pass it up lol 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all as unlikely typos and per previous RfD. Unnecessary maintenance. —  HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 09:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, these redirects are unnecessary. Suonii180 (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all. I'd have R3ed these if I'd seen them as these are not plausible typos in the way we use that term. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unnecessary recently created typo redirects StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above and suggest to I am RedoStone that they take a break from creating redirect altogether, their record is not great and this sort of passive-aggressive redirect creation is not a good look re:ability to take a hint. Rusalkii (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all as implausible typos. Rusty4321 ^{talk contribs} 22:07, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per the above; no objections and reasons to speedy delete have been explained by Thryduulf. Not plausible typos. --GnocchiFan (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment (I'm only commenting here as I've already voted) -- Even without the speedy delete recommendation, this is getting pretty clearly into WP:SNOW territory. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 22:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Sick#Medical conditions. ✗plicit 03:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Being sick → Vomiting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There are hundreds of different ways to interpret being sick, with a massive list of symptoms and/or other characteristics to choose from. Taking this hyper-generic phrase and targeting at one outcome of being sick, is not helpful as a redirect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Disease, which seems (at least to me) like the best fit we have. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

to the dab at Sick#Medical conditions as per Thryduulf, Rusalkii, and Fieari. I'll note that vomiting is one of the three targets listed in that specific section of the dab, which should ameliorate concerns about the current target being technically correct. (It also happens to have Disease right there!) 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to the dab at Sick#Medical conditions, where people can find links to disease, infection and vomiting which are the three most likely meanings of this term. Thryduulf (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "Being sick" is a euphemism for vomiting, so the current target does make sense. See wikt:be sick. - Eureka Lott 17:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Mixed feelings here. The first few Google results are all for vomiting, but then again the first Google results for Apple are the company. Inclined towards retarget to Sick#Medical conditions per Thryduulf, but not strongly opposed to current target either. Rusalkii (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to the dab at Sick#Medical conditions, I agree that vomiting is the most common meaning of this phrase, but it's not the ONLY meaning, and so the dab is appropriate. You could suggest a hatnote, but I think that would be clutter, and just retargetting to the dab is a much better idea. Fieari (talk) 07:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Cadenhead's old raj → Springbank distillery  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I see only a loose connection between this redirect and the target article. There is a link with the Cadenheads but "old raj"? But I might not be up on lingo for distilleries. I came upon this redirect, one of many created by this editor while tagging some of their category creations. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete google results make it clear that (Cadenhead's) Old Raj is a gin bottled by Cadenhead's. The only connection is that Cadenhead's is owned by J & A Mitchell & Company, who also own the target distillery, but there is no information about this product at the target (and there shouldn't be) or anywhere else on Wikipedia (I have no opinion whether there should be) making the redirect unhelpful. Thryduulf (talk) 12:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Thryduulf, for doing such a thorough search. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Bagel Figglehorn → Fred Figglehorn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Bagel Frederick Figglehorn → Fred Figglehorn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of "Bagel" anywhere at the target article, no mention of this particular offshoot character anywhere on Wikipedia, apart from a contextless one-off name-drop in the Fred: The Show cast. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 06:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Puyallup Resvn → Puyallup Tribe of Indians  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not sure why this was created as it seems implausible that anyone would ever make that typo (Puyallup Reservation > Puyallup Resvn), "Resvn" isn't any slang I know, and nothing links to it, so I feel like it should be deleted. I would have marked it for speedy deletion but it's been around for two years. The only edit besides its creation was from a bot fixing a double redirect a few months ago. PersusjCP (talk) 02:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Agree that this is an extremely unlikely typo. Yuchitown (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

• Keep This is not a typo but an abbreviation used on maps, directories, etc (especially paper ones) where space is limited in the same way many other geographical features are making it a highly plausible search term. As an example of use see this US Census map. Indeed I see a different map was cited in the creation edit summary, so I'm not sure what sort of BEFORE the nominator did. Thryduulf (talk) 02:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - @PersusjCP: @Yuchitown: I documented in the edit summary and in the comments "Form from https://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/DC2020/PL20/st53_wa/schooldistrict_maps/c53033_king/DC20SD_C53033.pdf see page 1/5" which means I got it directly from a U.S. government document. This is not a typo. This is an officially used abbreviation. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Discussion taking place about whether to include this nickname, which the existence of this redirect is tied to. (non-admin closure) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Genocide Joe → List of nicknames of presidents of the United States#Joe Biden  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A non-neutral nickname which is not discussed at the target list of nicknames. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It was removed from the list with the rationale "WP:BLP violation seems to imply that Biden did genocide" by @Isla despite having a copious amount of sources pointing to its usage. I restored the mention of the nickname. The fact that it's pejorative is irrelevant- most of the nicknames there are. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 02:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is relevant is that it's not mentioned at the target. Was simply setting the stage on what the redirect is, a non-neutral nickname, often deletable via WP:RFD#DELETE reason #3. It seems that this was unfortunately poor timed on my part as there was a talk page discussion deciding on whether or not to include this nickname at the target list, which was dormant until a couple hours before this RfD. No need to split the discussion between here and the talk page; as this seems to be a content debate, I'll be closing this. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:57, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per HadesTTW PersusjCP (talk) 02:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Nanomachines, son → Metal Gear Rising: Revengeance  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An r from meme catchphrase, not mentioned at the target article. Wikipedia is not a compository of meme-to-source redirect connections. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as much as I like this meme fountain of a game, en.wiki is not an indiscriminate collection of memes. --Lenticel ^(talk) 13:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Even the article on Senator Armstrong (Metal Gear) doesn't mention the quote, which is surprising. But, it indicates that this should be deleted until such time that information is integrated somewhere. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Are you toon enough → Toontown Online  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

A catchphrase that is not discussed at the target article. Searching for this specific quote instead of the service itself is an intentional decision that should be reflected in content, but is not present. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Wowee → Mario  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The word "wow" is not mentioned at the target, much less "wowee", also not mentioned. I find it extremely far-fetched to believe that people would search for Mario by typing in "wowee" instead of "Mario". For people that would make the decision to use the phrase "wowee", it would seem expectable to have some content about the phrase "wowee" as a target, which we do not have on Wikipedia. There's plenty of other mentions of "wowee" across Wikipedia; it could be worthwhile to delete this and let the Wikipedia search do it's thing. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No idea what this is supposed to mean. Sergecross73 msg me 02:02, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Does not seem to relate to Mario at all. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A couple of days ago Facebook decided to show me a video where someone had replaced the "woo-hoo"s in Song 2 with vaguely similar noises from a Mario game (that weren't really that similar to my ears). It wouldn't surprise me if this was part of a similar meme or something, even if so that is far from the only reason someone might search this and we don't have any useful information for people who are looking for that. Thryduulf (talk) 02:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Dunno about anyone else, but when I see this collection of letters, the first thought that goes through my mind is definitely NOT Mario. Heck, my mind brings up some fics from the SCP Foundation before it brings up Mario. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 14:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's likely meant to be in reference to "Wowee Zowee!" which the characters say in Super Mario Bros. Wonder. Not sure why it redirects here either way, but thought I may as well clear up confusion. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was first done in 2021, so it can't be that. Sergecross73 msg me 02:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This got me to do a history dive on this one. Redirect was originally created in 2008 targeting WoWee, then retargeted to WowWee near immediately by its creator, with indication that the latter was the intended target. It stayed at that target until 2021, when it indeed was retargeted to Mario by user:Rng0286 under the stated belief that this was a quote from Mario.

For the record, I'll note that the original target of WowWee is ALSO a bad target for this redirect, and would probably generate a fair bit of WP:SURPRISE. My vote will stay on Delete. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:49, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Mom, Phineas and Ferb are building an invention! → List of Phineas and Ferb characters#Candace Flynn  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think "building an invention" is ever said by Candace; this is a genericized version of a specific opener that is unlikely to be predicted as a search term; the full deal is not mentioned at the target, and I don't imagine it would be used as a replacement search term for Candace. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unlikely search term, as evidenced by its virtual lack of use. Sergecross73 msg me 01:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's kinda fun that it exists, but it's completely pointless. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 04:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an unlikely search term. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• A deletion vote...? ...PERRY the deletion vote!? Not only is 'the full deal' not mentioned at target; the fragment "Mom, Phineas..." fails to show up, so not even truncating this redirect down would save it. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 12:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Not quite my tempo → Whiplash (2014 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An unmentioned catchphrase from the movie Whiplash, a phrase that is never alluded to at the target page. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not sure that this catchphrase ever caught on in popularity enough to warrant it as a search term a decade later (or ever.) Sergecross73 msg me 16:18, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Fire and water cannot be together → Elemental (2023 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Elements cannot mix → Elemental (2023 film)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Quotes from the movie Elemental, neither of which are mentioned at the target. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wasn't the first one also a plot point in an episode of Lilo and Stitch: The Series? 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 05:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - concurrently an unlikely search term, and not particularly specific enough to just link to this target. Sergecross73 msg me 00:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as too vague and not useful enough to point here or anywhere else. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Good night, Chet. Good night, David. And good night, for NBC News → The Huntley–Brinkley Report  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

An r from catchphrase from a news report closer that is no longer mentioned at the target. Catchphrases, similar to r from lyrics, are not useful as redirects on a general basis. People searching specifically for a catchphrase are looking for information about this specific search term, which the target does not contain. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No idea why someone would use that as a search term. And basically no one does. Sergecross73 msg me 00:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not useful and an unlikely search term. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).