(74/1/2); Closed as successful by WjBscribe at 19:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lifebaka (talk · contribs) - Lifebaka is a user who I have noticed around for a long time at Deletion Review. He always makes thoughtful and considered contributions there based on a good knowledge of policy. He also often helps out by notifying the deleting admin of deletion reviews where this has not already been done. Lifebaka often has to use the cached version to base his sensible contributions such as [1] and [2] on - the tools would be a definite help here in enabling him to see the deleted versions.
Lifebaka has been on wikipedia for over a year now and has made over four thousand great edits. His contributions to Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion, as well as at deletion review, demonstrate a good knowledge of the speedy criteria. He is always civil and has an excellant edit summary usage. Lifebaka is very helpful with new users often welcoming them and his talk page has numerous thank you's from users who have appreciated his assistance. He may not be the most prolific article writer but is always willing to assist those who are. In short Lifebaka is a helpful, civil user with good knowledge of policy who will put the tools to good use in areas where more admins are always needed. Davewild (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Additional question from AnotherSolipsist:
Non-pointless question from ImperfectlyInformed: do you notify creators when you put up a PROD message, especially when it is a newbie, or do you "leave it to the watchlist"?
Additional Pointless Question from User:Stifle
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Lifebaka before commenting.