The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Topical archive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one place, Wikipedia:Topic archive. That page is marked as historical, so I see no way for this to acquire more uses. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:27, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:S-line/BJS left/19 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/CMTA left/Red (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/CMTA right/Red (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/DSB right/IC10 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/ERL left/KLIA Ekspres (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/ERL left/KLIA Transit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/ERL right/KLIA Ekspres (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/ERL right/KLIA Transit (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/Istanbul Metro right/M3 Olimpiyat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KTM Intercity left/Ekspres Rakyat Timuran (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KTM Intercity left/Ekspres Selatan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KTM Intercity left/Jurong Freight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KTM Intercity left/Shuttle Tebrau (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KTM Intercity right/Ekspres Selatan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KTM Intercity right/Jurong Freight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/KTM Intercity right/Shuttle Tebrau (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/RapidKL LRT left/KL Monorail (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/RapidKL LRT right/KL Monorail (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/SARL left/City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:S-line/SARL right/City (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Somehow I missed a few unused S-line templates in my previous nomination, or these have become unused since that nomination. In any event, I am nominating this further batch of templates. These are all of the untranscluded Template:S-line subpages that have not been edited in 2021. Please see the previous nomination (closed as delete), this similar discussion from 2011, and this discussion confirming that these unused templates are unlikely to be used in the future, since the project is moving from ((S-line)) to ((Adjacent stations)). – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Age verfication required (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and it be hard to go through which sources would require age verification. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:26, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. (But I don't understand the second part of the nomination, and this would be keepable if it were used) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: No opinion on keep/delete, but if it is kept, it should be moved to fix the typo in "verification". – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Anomie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Wikipedia articles with unclear gender progress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template no longer used or needed after this Tfd from June 7. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:XuzhouM lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Also sufficiently trivial as to not need a template. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete for multiple reasons:

• Template:Xpdplain: Moved without redirect to Template:User:Patrick/Xpdplain with comment "currently not needed in the Template namespace" by Patrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
• Template:Xpdop10pec: Moved without redirect to Template:User:Patrick/Xpdop10pec with comment "currently not needed in the Template namespace" by Patrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
• Template:Xpd5opec: Moved without redirect to Template:User:Patrick/Xpd5opec with comment "currently not needed in the Template namespace" by Patrick (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

AnomieBOT⚡ 13:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Xpd5opec (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Xpdop10pec (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Xpdplain (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, they are part of a set of tools, see m:help:expansion demo templates. It is more practical to have them ready for use than to have to recreate them when they are needed. - Patrick (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

If you plan on using them, you should add them where they are needed, otherwise having them sitting around doesn't do any good. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:02, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It's been thirteen years. If these were ever going to be needed, they would have been used by now * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved them to my user space. - Patrick (talk) 11:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CCSouthSydneyRabbitohsLadder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused standings template that is redundant as the main article has a more accurate listing in table format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CEOs of Microsoft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and all articles are already listed on the main Microsoft template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CCBL seasons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An unused template with no links as no articles exist for Cape Cod seasons. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no links, no use. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Tennis at the Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:Infobox tennis tournament event Sod25 (talk) 18:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:After Tolkien navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

basically unused Frietjes (talk) 17:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Only three links. No benefit provided. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 17:20, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:RJL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - this template is a maintenance tag. Being unused is a good thing, hopefully it stays that way. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 21:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep—as Floydian says, it's a maintenance tag, and from time to time, it won't be in active use. Unlike WikiCleanerMan, it is needed from time to time to prompt compliance with MOS:RJL. Imzadi 1979 → 01:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As stated above, it's a maintenance template for a backlog that is thankfully not full. SounderBruce 08:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I didn't know about this template, but now that I do I will use it. There are several thousand articles that this could be applied to. --Rschen7754 18:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:C1YearInTopic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused fork of the infobox already featured on the AD 50 article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as redundant to Template:M1 year in topic * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hang on (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No longer used Lunacats (talk) 15:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Kept for historical record. Still used on talk pages. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:23, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The category it creates is no longer in existence. The "contest this speedy deletion" button has fully replaced any sort of functionality. I don't get the whole "keep it because it's historical" argument. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:21, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  The template was deprecated from the October 15, 2011. Templates that have been deprecated are still kept even if unused for the historical record that I'm referring to. Deprecated templates don't do harm even if left unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There is nothing of value in this specific template to be kept compared to other templates. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Gonnym. --Izno (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Table section (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:24, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Sofia Metro M4 line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; incomplete fork of ((Sofia Metro 2)). Mackensen (talk) 12:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fork. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Split suburban railway map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused duplicate of ((Split suburban railway)). Mackensen (talk) 12:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fork. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Phil Elverum (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a template that transcludes two related navboxes. The only logical place to use them, Phil Elverum, just transcludes each of the two navboxes separately. This template is redundant and more opaque for editors who would want to modify it if it were placed somewhere. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Redundant. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Hauntology (music) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The only link to this template is Hauntology (music) not including the categories. At that article, Template:Hauntology is used instead, making Hauntology (music) redundant. This 2020 template was also made after the Hauntology template was made in 2017. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not a template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Barkam weatherbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and redundant as the Barkam article already has weather information on it in table format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Badgetemplate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Babel field 0 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:User blank-0.5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:57, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both as redundant to ((Userbox-level)) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Branson TV (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and doesn't have any benefit. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Michelle Dilhara (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Michelle Dilhara series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Templates for an actress that has nothing to do with the person itself other than lists her filmography. The series template is usually for politicians and remains unused. Not good use of template space. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The actual reason for deletion here is that the sidebar is unused and the navbox is only used at Michelle Dilhara and not any of the other articles it links to, making it not a proper use of a navbox. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution to ensure the extant data is not lost. Primefac (talk) 09:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Slovakia – Area (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Category documentation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Delta comment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Identifier population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Penultimate population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Penultimate unlocalized population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Population density (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Population Development (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Population Development/Table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Reference (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Text area (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Text population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Text population density (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Unlocalized population (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Slovakia – Year of data (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Category:Statistic of Slovak places by Dušan Kreheľ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This set of templates are used in a nested fashion to put statistics in articles about Slovakia, such as Abranovce. This presumably makes it easier for the author of Statistic of Slovak places by Dušan Kreheľ to update the stats from their website, which is used as the data source. It's great to have these statistics in Wikipedia, but unfortunately this nest of templates makes it difficult for other editors to improve the formatting, make corrections, or do their own updates. (For example, after poking around these templates for a few minutes, despite having edited Wikipedia for decades and writing bots myself, I couldn't figure out where the numbers are actually coming from.) I think the best thing to do would be to flatten out all this complexity by subst:ing all these templates (which as I discovered would have to be done recursively). For future mass updates, I think it would be better to have a bot dump formulaic prose in articles or infoboxes directly, which is what has been done for U.S. census results. -- Beland (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notified Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slovakia and User talk:Dušan Kreheľ. -- Beland (talk) 00:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Don't really understand the main goal here. These templates just add more mess than they intend to fix. Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• I noticed these templates for some other reason and I immediately came to the conclusion the lot should be deleted as being duplicated by appropriate infoboxes and etc. I certainly hadn't realized there was a COI here with an external website. --Izno (talk) 05:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• substitute and delete Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Substitute and Delete per the nom. They are a hinderance to cooperative editing by being unduly idiosyncratic and raise COI concerns. Newshunter12 (talk) 19:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BtcAddress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A dead link to the blockchain website. Not a template and really it's just promotional nonsense. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. The link being dead is irrelevant, since it could be fixed (they just restructured the website it links to), and the template is not promoting anything by itself (as there could be legitimate links to bitcoin addresses; whether they are spam depends on context). But regardless, the lack of use is a sufficient reason for deletion. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).