< February 3 February 5 >

February 4

Template:Db-g0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace. If you still wish to see it deleted, please feel free to re-nominate it at WP:MFD. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing humorous about this template. Someone seeing this template could mistake it for a ((Db-u2)) template and erroneously delete the page that is tagged. Or, someone seeing this template and attempting to deny the speedy deletion will be looking for a ((Db-u2)) template and find nothing. In most cases, humor is fine, but since this template essentially trolls users attempting to genuinely help Wikipedia (and since today is not April Fools' Day), this template's harm outweighs its humor. Steel1943 (talk) 23:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see the humor, but the rest of my statement applies. Steel1943 (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This template does not add to collaboration or anything wiki-related and is used on user page to make it more social network-y. There are sites for that sort of thing, and en.wiki is not it. Gonnym (talk) 10:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:4TeamBracket-Stepladder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused bracket templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021–22 Bangladesh Federation groups tables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused standings templates with no major edits except for creation. Probably were abandoned by the creator. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Electoral Districts of Lebanon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and clearly unfinished since it's a navbox with no links. Not sure there's really any content to link to, and the miniscule maps of Lebanon don't help. Nigej (talk) 20:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EIA Current Collaboration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused banner for the "current Education in Australia Collaboration of the Month selected article!". Someone tried to speedy delete it 14 years ago. Nigej (talk) 20:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EU Special Member State Territories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:38, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused clickable map. Presumably intended for Special member state territories and the European Union but there's no map there. Doesn't really work with much overlapping and congestion, even if some of the obvious errors were corrected. Nigej (talk) 20:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EU member states' opt-outs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since the content was copied to Opt-outs in the European Union#Summary table a year ago, since when it has been subject to the cut-and-thrust of editing by different people and has turned into something quite different, exactly as the system is meant to work. Nigej (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Swedish princes by marriage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since it's surplus to ((Swedish princes)) which has a note 4 covering these. Nigej (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SwedishPrimeMinistersTimeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 17:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Long vertical timeline, unused and not updated since 2013. List of prime ministers of Sweden#Timeline has its own style. Nigej (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ship classes of the Swedish navy 1940 to present

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with ((WWII Swedish ships)) and ((ActiveSwedishNavyClasses)) being used instead. Nigej (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PhilAtlas detail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 17:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. PhilAtlas was listed at MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist in June 2020. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 17:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User SwedishMilitaryRanksBefore1972

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 17:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All now unused. I have copied the contents of the first three to Military ranks of the Swedish Armed Forces. The other two are insignia templates, not needed as Military ranks of the Swedish Armed Forces covers the area Nigej (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RankPersonsDistributionRegular

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Table of the number of personnel in the Swedish Armed Forces from 2009 to 2012. Not used. Nigej (talk) 16:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Population tableau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and nearly 3 years old. Creates a table with years and populations. Nigej (talk) 14:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Polytechnic colleges in Kerala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of polytechnic colleges in Kerala in the form of a navbox, but no articles to link to. Nigej (talk) 12:49, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing. Delete as it fails navigation. Gonnym (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PALon COTM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template banner for the current Public Art in London Collaboration of the Month! Unused and not likely to be used again. No mention at Wikipedia:WikiProject Public Art/London. Nigej (talk) 12:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, not a hint of it ever being used and even if it were to be used, I'd support deletion as there are just too many talk page banners and this should not be one of them. Gonnym (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and I created the template. These Collaborations of the Month were a short-lived (but worthwhile) experiment, and this template won't be used again. Ham II (talk) 21:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vietnamese military insignia templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates created in Sep 2021 for inclusion in Vietnamese military ranks and insignia. However the additions were reverted and they are now unused. The last one seems to be a copy of one of the others, presumably created by mistake. Nigej (talk) 12:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thessaloniki Metro Phases 1 and 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:05, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; redundant to ((Thessaloniki Metro)). Mackensen (talk) 12:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Garfield Route (1953-1958)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Garfield Park branch (CTA). plicit 12:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Garfield Route (1953-1958) with Template:Garfield Park branch (CTA).
The Garfield Park branch articles uses ((Garfield Park branch (CTA))) right now; ((Garfield Route (1953-1958))) is unused. They're different enough I'm unsure which should be kept and whether a merge would be appropriate, but we probably only need one going forward. Mackensen (talk) 11:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Typhoon status small

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems unused and no edits since 2012. Nigej (talk) 09:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tram cars of UralTransMach

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of ((UTM tram cars)). Nigej (talk) 09:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to alternative versions of who the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors were. Written as a navbox but just confusing. The parent article has a section on "Variations" which works better. Nigej (talk) 08:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tibetan Buddhist Refuge Formulations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been extracted from Refuge in Buddhism at some point and now it's been translated into Chinese. Difficult to imagine any usage. Nigej (talk) 08:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Judeo-Christian navboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Split into Template:Christian navboxes and Template:Jewish navboxes. –Ploni (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 08:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Vehicle registration plates of the European Union

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to ((Timeline of Vehicle registration plates of Europe)) which is used at Vehicle registration plates of Europe#Timeline. Nigej (talk) 07:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...Those are one of the worst layout designs I've seen yet. I couldn't tell what is a link and it was not even clear what I was reading. Anyways, delete both as unused. Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of political parties in the National Council of Austria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to National Council (Austria)#Since 1945, which has a timeline already showing the size of the parties too.Nigej (talk) 07:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Tabaristan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the rules of Tabaristan. Doesn't work, with confusing abbreviations and small, overlapping text. Nigej (talk) 06:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of the history of the Republic of Turkey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 10:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Were considered at this mass TfD: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 4#Unused timeline templates and kept. Still unused and unusable with minute illegible text. Nigej (talk) 06:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Nancy Pelosi's political career

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy per request. plicit 10:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timelines. Style doesn't really work for me. Needs to be copied somewhere eg Electoral history of Joe Biden and then deleted or just deleted. Nigej (talk) 05:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Test Teams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timelines relating to Test Cricket teams, Twenty20 International teams and the Indian Premier League. Were added to these articles but since deleted. There's a vast amount of coverage for the Indian Premier League and something like Indian Premier League#Teams' performances works better as a timeline than the one here. Nigej (talk) 05:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Early Netherlandish painters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is an article Early Netherlandish painting. However this timeline from 2006 is unused and given its old-fashioned style it's difficult to imagine it ever being used. Nigej (talk) 05:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline early Python

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:57, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline for Python (programming language) only up to 2005 for some unknown reason. History of Python is the only plausible place for it, but that uses a different style. Nigej (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. History article uses a different graph. Gonnym (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it goes to 2005 to signify "early" releases. It was intended to go to History of Python, along with other timelines that cover more modern history from 2005. However, it's clearly abandoned. Not sure what deleting will achieve. +mt 12:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

MBTA line diagrams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused line templates showing various stages of MBTA lines. Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Two hundred untranscluded route diagram templates there probably isn't a use for them. Mackensen (talk) 01:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Greater Manchester bus route 184

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; the parent article was deleted. Mackensen (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).