This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | → | Archive 15 |
I am focusing Chhattisgarh and Haryana Susheelgiri (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:New normal (business)#Requested move 11 July 2020. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
There seems to be contradictions in the sources and content of the article about whether or not this is a hoax. The source I just added confirms that this is a real phenomenon. Maybe it was a hoax at first but it seems like there are genuine events like this. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi all. My name is Martin Gerlach and I'm a research scientist in the Research team at the Wikimedia Foundation. I'm reaching out to you to let you know about an upcoming research showcase we're organizing that could be of interest to you:
This upcoming Wednesday, July 15, at 9:30 AM PDT/16:30 UTC the Wikimedia Research showcase will feature 2 talks around medical knowledge on Wikipedia: an overview by Denise Smith on the various ways users engage with Wikipedia’s health content in general as well as a timely study by Giovanni Colavizza on how editors are integrating knowledge on Covid-19 at an unprecedented pace. The talks will be live-streamed on (youtube) and there will also be time for audience questions during Q&A. More details, see here. --MGerlach (WMF) (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
What about dividing the items of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19/Current consensus into sections? I have composed one below:
General
1. There is no consensus about whether to use Template:Current at the top of articles covered by this project. The de facto practice has been to include them for less-trafficked articles but not for the most heavily trafficked ones. Link 1
2. Refrain from using Worldometer (worldometers.info) as a source due to common errors being observed as noted on Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19/Case Count Task Force#Common errors. Link 1, Link 2
3. For infoboxes on the main articles of countries, use Wuhan, Hubei, China for the origin parameter. Link 1
4. "Social distancing" is generally preferred over "physical distancing". Link 1, Link 2
Page title
1. Coronavirus disease 2019 is the full name of the disease and should be used for the main article. COVID-19 (full caps) is preferable in the body of all articles, and in the title of all other articles/category pages/etc. Link 1, Link 2
2. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is the full name of the virus and should be used for the main article. SARS-CoV-2 (exact capitalisation and punctuation) is preferable in the body of all articles, and in the title of all other articles/category pages/etc. Link 1
Map
1. There is no consensus about which color schemes to use, but they should be consistent within articles as much as possible. There is agreement that there should be six levels of shading, plus gray for areas with no instances or no data. Link 1, Link 2
2. There is no consensus about whether the legend, the date, and other elements should appear in the map image itself. Link 1, Link 2
3. For map legends, ranges should use fixed round numbers (as opposed to updating dynamically). There is no consensus on what base population to use for per capita maps. Link 1, Link 2
--Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:53, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
--Deepak7217 (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)Deepak7217
https://apnablog.net/2020/07/corona-crisis-california-shut-down-new-epic-centers/ --Deepak7217 (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Deepak7217 16:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepak7217 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
It is an interesting website but no one is checking out. It's supposed to be interesting in the first place. 🤔 Esaïe Prickett (talk) 08:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi all, another question. The US state pandemic articles (COVID-19 pandemic in Colorado, etc etc) seem to be missing info on state-level laws and policies passed in response to the pandemic. I'm thinking of things like eviction and foreclosure moratoria, extending unemployment benefits, etc etc, many of which are on a state-by-state level. Is that an oversight because we haven't gotten to it yet, or has there been discussion about this kind of info? I'm guessing this is a working-on-it situation as some state articles are more detailed than others, but I'm interested in collaborating with anyone working on these articles or who has been thinking about their overall structure. Thoughts? -- phoebe / (talk to me) 14:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
In desktop view, there isn't a link to the Bengali page while for the mobile view, there is a link to টেমপ্লেট:২০১৯–২০ করোনাভাইরাসের বৈশ্বিক মহামারীর উপাত্ত/বাংলাদেশে চিকিৎসামূলক ঘটনার রেখাচিত্ which is an empty page. Anyone can help fix it? --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
I'm working on Commons and I've been adding new (US) public domain content when I come across it. Here are some of the latest images I've uploaded. They might come in handy for a some of your work. :) Missvain (talk) 01:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic#Another plea for basic scrutiny of recent changes. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 18:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
COVID-19 pandemic death rates by country was created without prior discussion a few days ago, separate from already-existing COVID-19 pandemic deaths, Mortality due to COVID-19, and COVID-19 pandemic by country and territory. I've nominated it for deletion per WP:CONTENTFORK at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COVID-19 pandemic death rates by country; more voices at that discussion would be welcome. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 21:42, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The "international aid" section of COVID-19 pandemic was recently removed as overly China-centric (see small discussion here with NickCT and Gerald Waldo Luis). It has some useful info, though, so it might be able to be split out into its own page (or added to another page), preferably with some balance to make it less China-centric. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 10:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
I thought about putting one of them into Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on science and technology but am not sure that's a good place and would welcome suggestions. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 18:11, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
There is no COVID-19-test, just a SARS-CoV-2 test. The virus is not the desease, but its cause (for some). By the way, COVID-19 is not SARS.
Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/UMass Boston/Composition II (Summer 2020) has a student interested in working on Management of COVID-19. It sounds like a writing class, rather than a health or science class, so I expect the focus to be on making the writing clear and correct. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Last week the article COVID-19 pandemic in the post-Soviet states was created. I just nominated it for deletion since it doesn't seem to make sense to me to have an article which consists of a list of ex-Soviet countries and which just summarises the pandemic in these countries, especially since the Soviet Union ceased to exist nearly three decades before the pandemic began.
Any discussion is welcome. --Xwejnusgozo (talk) 11:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
I have nominated it for deletion again. Starzoner (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Long COVID is currently a re-direct. Is there appetite for turning that into a separate article? Relevant citations:
"Long COVID" refers to the phenomenon of some people having symptoms for many months after infection. Also referred to as "long haulers". Bondegezou (talk) 14:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
[a]side from anecdotal evidence, there is as yet little research on this issue. However, it is being actively discussed within the research community.It sounds a little too early for the subject to be considered notable enough for its own article. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 14:35, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
You may be interested in participating in this discussion[1] on the Donald Trump page about how to cover the COVID-19 pandemic in the lead to his article, and be included in this beautifully formatted table of red and green squares[2]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snooganssnoogans (talk • contribs)
The current video summary is not benefiting and require refreshment of content (see discussion here). The renewal script is currently a draft here. Suggestions and edits are most welcomed in advance. GeraldWL 16:16, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
The Washington Post:
---Another Believer (Talk) 19:21, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
References
Hi Folks, i've just read Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Lebanon and so I come here.
The Article COVID-19 pandemic in Lebanon has an urgent need of updates, because the covid-situation ist expanding. See: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/lebanon/
Together with the 2020 Beirut explosions and now the the resignation of the complete lebanese cabinet the covid-situation can sorrowly be expected to be and expand chaotic.
Please can anyone help the article? Best regards --80.187.98.82 (talk) 06:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
As of 18:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC) Category:Pages where template include size is exceeded has two COVID-19 related articles and two COVID-19 related templates (list). Templates and references at the bottom of these pages may not display properly in all web browsers or skins. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
I have created a new article on Transmission of COVID-19. Most sections are still a bit skeletal and could be filled out farther. Anyone who contributes significant text in the next week gets included on the DYK credit! John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Just FYI, this project now has 200 participants. Huge thanks to all for the collective work done by these editors and many others who are not 'official' members. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Has this study been mentioned in any of the articles?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I'm in the middle of a BRFA for a bot that sweeps articles containing Covid rates and updates them. I'm looking to replace all the rates tables and charts with templates managed by the bot, will this be ok? WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 09:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Over at Talk:Severe_acute_respiratory_syndrome_coronavirus_2#Peer_reviewed_source_argues_for_serial_passage somebody has argued for the inclusion of an essay enitiled "Might SARS‐CoV‐2 Have Arisen via Serial Passage through an Animal Host or Cell Culture?" in BioEssays which suggests that serial passage might have lead to the emergence of SARS COV 2:
Taken together, the available evidence does not point definitively toward a natural origin for SARS‐CoV‐2, rather, much of it is more consistent with what would be found if the novel coronavirus had arisen from serial passage of a “precursor” progenitor virus in a lab, or from bats infecting a commercial mink farm somewhere in China, which would also provide the conditions for serial passage. However, more evidence is required before a conclusive judgement can be made one way or the other.
To me, this looks like advocacy for the fringe view that SARS COV 2 was created in a lab. In response to this, the lead author of the essay turned up to defend himself. I have no particular expertise on the topic but a single essay seems to me to fail WP:MEDRS for contentious issues like this, and lends the essay undue weight. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
We're wasting a lot of editor effort trying to update the case/death/recovery counts for every country in the world, in terms of updating Template:COVID-19 pandemic data and its subpages, redirecting editors who post about outdated stats in the wrong forums, forcing map creators to copy data, and not being able to benefit from non-English contributors updating data. There's a solution to this — Johns Hopkins publishes open data in a machine-readable format that could be imported to Wikidata, and we could in turn import the Wikidata values ourselves (as could every other Wikipedia, so that they won't need to keep copying our table). However, the bot proposal at Wikidata has been open for three months as of today, and until it's completed our per capita data table is too unreliable for mainspace use. Does anyone want to help the folks at Wikidata get this up and running? ((u|Sdkb)) talk 17:19, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Bumping thread. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi, a user has requested (at Talk:COVID-19_pandemic_in_Columbus,_Ohio#Edit_request:_update_total_cases_per_day_chart) that the data in the template ((COVID-19 pandemic data/United States/Ohio/Franklin County medical cases chart)) be updated. If any editors could help with that, that would be great, thanks! Seagull123 Φ 21:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
It's mostly been implemented already, but you are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:In the news § (Updated) Reducing the size of the COVID banner. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 08:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
There are multiple discussions at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard that would benefit from input from editors in this project. Although the sources being discuss are NOT being considered for WP:MEDRS, the publications' coverage of COVID-19 has been cited in reference to their general reliability. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 19:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Editing on this page and around COVID-19 topics in general doesn't seem to be super busy these past few weeks, so I think this might be a good time to have a very high-level, broad-minded discussion about how we're doing with our coverage so far. I'm opening up this thread as a space for that, and providing some questions to kick us off:
Feel free to answer whichever of those you're inclined to. Best, ((u|Sdkb)) talk 07:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
I've proposed changing the page name of Paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome to Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Since I've no idea how controversial this suggestion may prove, I've also set out my reasoning in some rather tedious detail, along with a straightforward tl;dr. Opinions welcome here. 86.190.132.245 (talk) 15:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
On a separate MIS-C-related matter, I feel it might be helpful to point out to fellow contributors here that MIS-C#History contains some reliable sourcing on the reporting of this rare condition in different countries around the world (some background information about its recognition, or otherwise, in MIS-C#Epidemiology). The geographical coverage is almost certainly incomplete (highlighting of genuine omissions welcome here :), and information on the actual burden of the disease is much more limited (for the US, this infographic is reliable and informative up to mid-July). MIS-C is a rare childhood condition that has emerged due to COVID-19, and it is a clinically relevant aspect of the pandemic which, imo, deserves appropriate (wp:due), reliably-sourced regional coverage. 86.190.132.245 (talk) 19:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
We could do with some more editors inputting at Talk:Paediatric_multisystem_inflammatory_syndrome#Lead_accessibility please. There are questions over whether to name SARS-CoV-2 and where to put information and citations (just in infobox, citations in headers, in lead, elsewhere?). Bondegezou (talk) 21:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The COVID Tracking Project, which is focused on U.S. COVID statistics, has just released all of their data under a CC-BY 4.0 license: https://covidtracking.com/about-data/license. Kaldari (talk) 20:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
As I AWB through COVID-19 articles, I notice very few ((orphan)) and ((underlinked)) tags going up. Having articles that link to each other well may seem minor, hence my choice of barnstar, but I've noticed that having articles that are well-linked to each other tends to increase the quality of said articles. This particular correlation means that well-linked articles are a bigger deal than people sometimes think. Everyone actively participating in this Wikiproject, particularly the wikilink gnomes, deserves a barnstar. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 07:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC) |
@Ryan1783: recently linked virtual school from the lead of COVID-19 pandemic, which led me to look at that page and its peers, since I'd previously considered distance learning the main page for that topic, as it has a lot of content about online learning and is the main page linked to from Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education. Well, it turns out Distance education#Internet has a ((main)) tag for Virtual education, which is a redirect to educational technology. Ugh. Does anyone want to go in and move a bunch of stuff around to sort all this out and remove the WP:CONTENTFORKs? ((u|Sdkb)) talk 07:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
See Talk:Coronavirus_disease_2019#9_"unreliable_medical_source?"_tags if you're familiar with appropriate medial sourcing and wish to help resolve issues in the Coronavirus disease 2019 article. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Do we have an article about pandemic pods or bubbles like the 2020 NBA Bubble (except usually on a smaller scale)? WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
correct term is Support bubble (see BBC article below). I hav also seen it being called quarantine bubble.
There is even an image at wiki commons allready it seems (see on the right). You could simply describe it at COVID-19_pandemic_in_New_Zealand article and then make a new page the redirects to that page (section in which you describe it in detail) Refs:
Genetics4good 13:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Early on, editors added categories like Category:January 2020 events in the United States and Category:February 2020 events in the United States to Wikipedia articles about the pandemic in specific U.S. states. By March/April, the month categories were applicable to almost all states. This will be continuing for the rest of 2020 and into 2021. Do editors agree the month categories are no longer helpful? And if so, do any project members care to help remove the U.S. state pages from Category:2020 events in the United States by month subcategories? ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:59, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Does current consensus reflect the following sentences as a summary of how COVID-19 is transmitted in the lead of COVID-19 and COVID-19 pandemic articles? --Investigatory (talk) 05:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, everyone! Hope you are all doing well. I noticed that much of the sources cited by Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 § Reservoir and zoonotic origin didn't support the text. I even removed a biomedical claim supported by a Forbes interview (with an expert, sure), which is not WP:MEDRS. I cleaned it up as much as possible, but someone else needs to double-check my work because we can't really afford to make this mistake twice. It would also benefit from some reorganization of the prose, if that is more your forte. Thank you so much, Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Wikipedia, as of right the state of California is now the worse infected state that surpasses the state of New York. I hope anyone to create the title called COVID-19 pandemic in Los Angeles. Currently, the title COVID-19 pandemic in Los Angeles is still a redirect. Los Angeles, is now the worse infected city in the United States. The new title COVID-19 pandemic in Los Angeles will focusing on California's largest city and the second largest city in the United States on how many confirmed cases and how many deaths and the city wide state of emergency was declared back in March. The title COVID-19 pandemic in New York City was already created as an article some months ago that focuses on New York City. Comments are welcome to consider turning from a redirect into a created article for COVID-19 pandemic in Los Angeles for proposal. Thank you. Steam5 (talk) 06:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
There are several on-going talk page discussions. Attention greatly appreciated. Feoffer (talk) 07:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Iowa has been going through a really rough patch, with the ongoing pandemic, the August 2020 Midwest derecho devastating Cedar Rapids, and the 2019 floods.
Alas, the COVID-19 pandemic in Iowa talk page now says:
"Because the day-to-day updates have ceased with 13 July 2020, I can make the assumption that a) No additional cases or deaths have occurred, b) The Wikipedia editors with knowledge of the Iowa sources have succumbed to Covid-19, c) The state health department has ceased publishing their collated data, d) Nobody cares about Iowa."
Anyone have ideas on how we mobilize some resources to add this information? -- Oliveleaf4 (talk) 03:42, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Sandister Tei was just named the Wikimedian of the Year, in part for her work related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ghana. First, congrats to her! Second, we might consider possible updates to Wikipedia's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, thanks again to the many Wikipedia editors who are doing such great work around this topic. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:17, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
There's an RFC at Talk:Nick_Cordero#RFC about whether or not to include his cause of death (Covid-19) in the infobox. Please feel free to comment on it. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 02:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Category:COVID-19 denialism has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~EdGl talk 21:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic § Unnecessary duplication of content from the main COVID-19 page. ((u|Gtoffoletto)) talk 08:40, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
More input would be helpful at the requested move at Talk:N95 mask#Requested move 13 October 2020. The reasons for changing the article name are quite technical, and a lot of people are citing WP:COMMONNAME for an article title that's not entirely accurate. Thanks. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Further to discussion here in August, a new article was created out of the former redirect Long Covid. The article is slim, but could be expanded using the bibliography I've added to the Further reading section. Most of it is simply news articles with the comments of experts in the field and editorials in medical journals, but there is also a handful of more substantial sources. I ask for volunteers to help expand the article in a project-compliant way, though I'd prefer to keep the "further reading" section as full as possible until there's more in the article's body, since many of the reports mention scientists with studies underway or projects completed that might produce proper papers in the fulness of time, or have already done so since the news' publication, and that can be of help to the article's future editors. GPinkerton (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Given that 'Covid' and 'Covid-19' are now listed as nouns in the OED[3] and Lexico[4], and most recent RS coverage in the UK seems to use this form, I think it's time to recommend this form, rather than the all-caps version, for British English at least. What do we think? -- DeFacto (talk). 07:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I explained that, like most British newspapers, the Guardian’s style is to use uppercase for abbreviations that are written and spoken as a collection of letters, such as BBC, IMF and NHS, whereas acronyms pronounced as words go upper and lower, eg Nasa, Unicef and, now, Covid-19.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/19/covid-pedantry-national-crisis-spelling-grammar I wouldn't go in to change all the articles because of this though... it is a minor item and isn't "better" than what we have. So I would keep the current standard. -- ((u|Gtoffoletto)) talk 11:44, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi all. We are happy to announce a collaboration w/ World Health Organization to get open access media for Commons: https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2020/10/22/world-health-organization-and-wikimedia-foundation-expand-access/. We need your help identifying useful files for improving coverage of COVID: please share ideas on the Collaboration page on Commons. This involved a lot of long-term behind the scene conversations with World Health Organization. Thank you for everyone involved, and please help us identify and use the content from the organization. Astinson (WMF) (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Is this appropriate? ViperSnake151 Talk 04:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
There is a move request you may be interested in at Talk:Stephen Hahn (oncologist)#Requested move 18 October 2020. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 05:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
Two articles badly need merging. The current article COVID-19 pandemic in Ohio is only focused on the government and private sector response, with a link to a separate article called "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ohio." Other states have a single general article about the pandemic in the state, not two separate articles about "Government and Private Sector Response to Covid-19 in [name of state]" and "Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in [name of state]." Could we please merge the two articles about Ohio into a single article covering the pandemic in the state, as its title suggests? -- Oliveleaf4 (talk)
The WHO just uploaded some free images are relating to COVID-19, The Wikimedia Foundation and the World Health Organization to open access of free illustrations are being shared by the WHO such as infographics, infodemic, and informational video. If would be possible within facts or fears are being caused during the pandemic? --122.2.10.69 (talk) 01:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
If would be possible within facts or fears are being caused during the pandemic? —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 01:53, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
"Some pages can be “locked” and cannot be changed until one of more than 200 volunteer editors on WikiProject Covid-19, many of whom are doctors or academics, review it."
---Another Believer (Talk) 16:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
I think a task force is needed for health departments dealing with archaic technology and reporting procedures. As far as I can ascertain this is almost entirely at the county level, but the mish-mash of statistics is definitely a public health issue (and arguably a public relations issue). We need to be paying close attention to the reportage on the gubernatorial level. kencf0618 (talk) 11:50, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/13/upshot/coronavirus-response-fax-machines.html
Hi all, I'd like some help tidying up this navbox - I thought members here might have some clues given how important many aspects of the navbox area in relationship to the COVID epidemic. (I have cross posted at WP:MED, too).
I have come across this navbox and find it particularly difficult / ugly - the sections are weighted weirdly, the structure makes me worry there are missing topics, and some sections such as "Transmission" seem to be a long list that could be structured in a more easy to understand way. Unfortunately I don't have a great broad understanding of this area enough to make some changes to this navbox, and thought editors here might be able to have a look. Thanks, I hope! --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Courtesy link: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19/Archive 7 § Header icons
Courtesy link: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19/Archive 10 § Mobile view
I have proposed an alternative of the current header at User:Soumya-8974/WP19 header, which will fix the current header problem. It is based on the header of the WP:ASTRONOMY project, and has a frame similar to the current header. Any thoughts? --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 17:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Any articles related to COVID-19, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, may be subjected under discretionary sanctions. --122.2.10.69 (talk) 14:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
November 21st, 11am-1pm E.S.T: NYC COVID-19: Environmental Justice in Public Health Edit-A-Thon - ONLINE | |
---|---|
Hello WikiProject COVID-19!! Please join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 2nd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - this Saturday, Nov 21st, 2020 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into some of the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19. Please join us, we'd love to see you (online).
|
--Wil540 art (talk) 22:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
World Health Organization's response to the COVID-19 pandemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) needs updating from mid-October onwards. Something must have happened since then. GPinkerton (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic § Unnecessary duplication of content from the main COVID-19 page. ((u|Gtoffoletto)) talk 11:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Any articles related to COVID-19, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, may be subjected under discretionary sanctions. --122.2.10.69 (talk) 14:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
World Health Organization's response to the COVID-19 pandemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) needs updating from mid-October onwards. Something must have happened since then. GPinkerton (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic § Unnecessary duplication of content from the main COVID-19 page. ((u|Gtoffoletto)) talk 11:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Hiya project members, Statistics of COVID-19 pandemic in Sri Lanka is currently sitting in the NPP queue, and I'm having my doubts about the format. Have extended COVID statistics been split off into separate articles before? If so, does that make sense in this case? Some comments and/or proactive merging would be welcome - I'm leaving it unreviewed for the time being. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
A section on COVID-19 in Tablighi Jamaat is disputed, please discuss at Talk:Tablighi Jamaat/Archive 2#COVID-19 section. Fences&Windows 15:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Just a heads up, Bait30 has started making edits to this consensus that occurred in March/April. I personally do not have sufficient knowledge to make a comment, but I am just curious what is it for. Just felt like mass changes should be told here. Starzoner (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
edits to this consensusas saying you were contravening the result, not implementing it. ((u|Sdkb)) talk 23:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)