Royal Barcelona Trading Company
Company typePublic company
Founded1755 (1755)
Defunct1785 (1785)
SuccessorRoyal Company of the Philippines
Area served
Catalonia, Caribbean
Productscotton, cocoa, indigo, brandy, wine, chintz
Total equity1 million pesos
A share certificate of the Compañía de Comercio de Barcelona, issued 23. July 1758

The Royal Barcelona Trading Company to the Indies (Spanish: Real Compañía de Comercio de Barcelona a Indias; Catalan: Companyia de Comerç de Barcelona) also known as the Barcelona Company was a trading company in the 18th century chartered by the Spanish crown, operating from 1755 to 1785, and which had a monopoly on trade to the Caribbean islands of Puerto Rico, Santo Domingo and Margarita. The company provided a legal framework and a focus for capital which enabled Catalan merchants to break free from the restrictions of the Cadiz monopoly on trade with the Indies, provided skills and contacts that enabled the development of free trade between Catalonia and the Americas to flourish after the company's demise, and contributed to the development of the textile industry which later became the basis of industrialisation in Catalonia.

Historical context

Since 1503, under the Habsburg kings, all trade with America had been conducted through the port of Seville (and after 1717, Cádiz) under a monopoly that prevented other cities, including Barcelona, from trade with the Americas, or the Indies as they were known. Tentatively by the late 17th century Catalan goods had reached the Indies via the Spanish coastal trade to Cádiz and this grew slowly until by the mid 1740s entire ships were beginning to be fitted out in Barcelona for transatlantic commerce.[1]

The Barcelona Company was one of a number of chartered companies established by the Spanish government in the 18th century as part of the Bourbon Reforms, with the intention of reforming Spain's commerce with the Americas,[2][3] integrating colonial economies at the peripheries of the Spanish Empire and reducing the activities of British, French and Dutch privateers and smugglers.[4]

These new companies enjoyed commercial privileges (so sometimes called 'Privileged Companies' in Spanish) and included the Royal Guipuzcoan Company of Caracas, the Honduras Company, the Seville Company and the Havana Company. They strongly resembled the English, Dutch and French trading companies of the 17th century.[5] Trading companies were not the only concerns with royal privileges chartered at this time; a number of royal factories [es] were also established.


The Barcelona Trading Company was granted a monopoly on trade to the Caribbean islands of Puerto Rico, Santo Domingo and Margarita as well as being allowed ten annual visits to Guatemala and Honduras, trade with Cumaná (north eastern Venezuela) and some limited trading with Havana.[6][1]

The company exported principally wine and brandy and increasingly chintz (or printed calico Catalan: indianes) as this industry grew in Barcelona. Imported products included raw cotton, indigo, brazilwood, cocoa, tobacco, sugar amongst others.[7]

The raw cotton and dyes assisted in the production of chintz (or printed calico Spanish: indianas) that was then reexported to the Americas as well as the domestic (Spanish peninsula) market. As Ringrose says,[7]

Unlike virtually all of the other commercial connections being developed, this one promised the sort of economic interdependence between peninsular industry and colonial markets and raw materials that was the ideal of mercantilist economic reformers.


In 1778, King Charles III signed the 'Decree of Free Trade' between Spain and the Americas effectively removing the company's monopoly. The company was further weakened by losing half its ships through the Spanish involvement in the American Revolutionary War.[7] The company was dissolved between 1784 and 1785 and merged with the Caracas Company to form the Royal Philippine Company.[6]


The company provided a legal framework and a vehicle for the concentration of capital necessary to break free of the Cadiz monopoly (which had proven difficult to surmount through the action of individual merchants) and created the conditions that would later allow free trade with the colonies to flourish.[1][8]

These conditions included the focus of a large part of the economic activity of the principality of Catalonia upon trade with the Americas, the integration of the economy with that of the colonies[9] and the building a base of knowledge, skill and commercial contacts amongst merchants who came to consider an Atlantic voyage as an everyday occurrence.[10]

The trade with the Americas also encouraged and fed the already growing industry of calico print production[11] and, much later, spinning and weaving of cotton cloth (the Royal Spinning Company [es] was established in Barcelona in 1772 to spin American raw cotton.[12] The textile industry became the basis of industrialisation in Catalonia in the 19th century,[13] although to what extent colonial trade contributed to the industry's growth, there is some debate.[14]

In contrast to the greater part of the American empire which achieved independence from Spain in the first decades of the 19th century, Cuba, Santo Domingo and Puerto Rico were amongst those few possessions that remained within the empire. Consequently, the trading relationships with Catalonia continued to build upon those established by the Barcelona Company (Antilles trade with all Spanish ports rising 300% between 1850 and 1890[15]) until these territories were finally lost in the Spanish–American War of 1898.


  1. ^ a b c Ringrose 1998, p. 104.
  2. ^ Ringrose 1998, p. 100.
  3. ^ "Compania Guipuzcoana". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 2007. Retrieved 28 October 2017.
  4. ^ Hunt 2013, pp. 3, 5.
  5. ^ Céspedes del Castillo 1983.
  6. ^ a b "Companyia de Comerc de Barcelona" [Barcelona Trading Company]. Encyclopedia Catalana (in Catalan). Grup Enciclopèdia Catalana. Retrieved 28 October 2017.
  7. ^ a b c Ringrose 1998, p. 105.
  8. ^ Oliva Melgar 1989, pp. 13–15.
  9. ^ Ringrose 1998.
  10. ^ Oliva Melgar 1989, p. 12.
  11. ^ Martínez Shaw 1974.
  12. ^ Nadal i Oller 2003, p. 51.
  13. ^ Thomson 1992, preface.
  14. ^ Fontana 1974, p. 358.
  15. ^ Ringrose 1998, pp. 133, 145.