Variations in the concentration of colored dissolved organic matter as seen from space. The dark brown water in the inland waterways contains high concentrations of CDOM. As this dark, CDOM-rich water moves offshore, it mixes with the low CDOM, blue ocean water from offshore.

Colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) is the optically measurable component of dissolved organic matter in water. Also known as chromophoric dissolved organic matter,[1] yellow substance, and gelbstoff, CDOM occurs naturally in aquatic environments and is a complex mixture of many hundreds to thousands of individual, unique organic matter molecules, which are primarily leached from decaying detritus and organic matter.[2] CDOM most strongly absorbs short wavelength light ranging from blue to ultraviolet, whereas pure water absorbs longer wavelength red light. Therefore, water with little or no CDOM, such as the open ocean, appears blue.[3] Waters containing high amounts of CDOM can range from brown, as in many rivers, to yellow and yellow-brown in coastal waters. In general, CDOM concentrations are much higher in fresh waters and estuaries than in the open ocean, though concentrations are highly variable, as is the estimated contribution of CDOM to the total dissolved organic matter pool.


This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Peatland river water draining into coastal waters
South-East Asia is home to one of the world's largest stores of tropical peatland and accounts for roughly 10 % of the global land-to-sea dissolved organic carbon (DOC) flux. The rivers carry high coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM) concentrations, shown here interfacing with ocean shelf water.[4]

The concentration of CDOM can have a significant effect on biological activity in aquatic systems. CDOM diminishes light intensity as it penetrates water. Very high concentrations of CDOM can have a limiting effect on photosynthesis and inhibit the growth of phytoplankton,[5][6][7][8] which form the basis of oceanic food chains and are a primary source of atmospheric oxygen. However, the influence of CDOM on algal photosynthesis can be complex in other aquatic systems like lakes where CDOM increases photosynthetic rates at low and moderate concentrations, but decreases photosynthetic rates at high concentrations.[9][7][6][10] CDOM concentrations reflect hierarchical controls.[11] Concentrations vary among lakes in close proximity due to differences in lake and watershed morphometry, and regionally because of difference in climate and dominant vegetation.[12][11][13] CDOM also absorbs harmful UVA/B radiation, protecting organisms from DNA damage.[14]

Absorption of UV radiation causes CDOM to "bleach", reducing its optical density and absorptive capacity. This bleaching (photodegradation) of CDOM produces low-molecular-weight organic compounds which may be utilized by microbes, release nutrients that may be used by phytoplankton as a nutrient source for growth,[15] and generates reactive oxygen species, which may damage tissues and alter the bioavailability of limiting trace metals.

CDOM can be detected and measured from space using satellite remote sensing and often interferes with the use of satellite spectrometers to remotely estimate phytoplankton populations. As a pigment necessary for photosynthesis, chlorophyll is a key indicator of the phytoplankton abundance. However, CDOM and chlorophyll both absorb light in the same spectral range so it is often difficult to differentiate between the two.

Although variations in CDOM are primarily the result of natural processes including changes in the amount and frequency of precipitation, human activities such as logging, agriculture, effluent discharge, and wetland drainage can affect CDOM levels in fresh water and estuarine systems.


Traditional methods of measuring CDOM include UV-visible spectroscopy (absorbance) and fluorometry (fluorescence). Optical proxies have been developed to characterize sources and properties of CDOM, including specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254) and spectral slopes for absorbance, and the fluorescence index (FI), biological index (BIX), and humification index (HIX) for fluorescence. Excitation emission matrices (EEMs)[16] can be resolved into components in a technique called parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC),[17] where each component is often labelled as "humic-like", "protein-like", etc. As mentioned above, remote sensing is the newest technique to detect CDOM from space.[citation needed]

See also


  1. ^ Hoge, FE; Vodacek, A; Swift, RN; Yungel, JK; Blough, NV (October 1995). "Inherent optical properties of the ocean: retrieval of the absorption coefficient of chromophoric dissolved organic matter from airborne laser spectral fluorescence measurements". Applied Optics. 34 (30): 7032–8. Bibcode:1995ApOpt..34.7032H. doi:10.1364/ao.34.007032. PMID 21060564.,
  2. ^ Coble, Paula (2007). "Marine Optical Biogeochemistry: The Chemistry of Ocean Color". Chemical Reviews. 107 (2): 402–418. doi:10.1021/cr050350+. PMID 17256912.
  3. ^ "Ocean Color". NASA Science. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  4. ^ Martin, P., Cherukuru, N., Tan, A.S., Sanwlani, N., Mujahid, A. and Müller, M.(2018) "Distribution and cycling of terrigenous dissolved organic carbon in peatland-draining rivers and coastal waters of Sarawak, Borneo", Biogeosciences, 15(2): 6847–6865. doi:10.5194/bg-15-6847-2018. Material was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  5. ^ Stedmon, C.A.; Markager, S.; Kaas, H. (2000). "Optical properties and signatures of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in Danish coastal waters". Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 51 (2): 267–278. Bibcode:2000ECSS...51..267S. doi:10.1006/ecss.2000.0645.
  6. ^ a b Seekell, David A.; Lapierre, Jean-François; Ask, Jenny; Bergström, Ann-Kristin; Deininger, Anne; Rodríguez, Patricia; Karlsson, Jan (2015). "The influence of dissolved organic carbon on primary production in northern lakes". Limnology and Oceanography. 60 (4): 1276–1285. Bibcode:2015LimOc..60.1276S. doi:10.1002/lno.10096. hdl:11336/5573. ISSN 1939-5590. S2CID 84008509.
  7. ^ a b Seekell, David A.; Lapierre, Jean-François; Karlsson, Jan (2015-07-14). "Trade-offs between light and nutrient availability across gradients of dissolved organic carbon concentration in Swedish lakes: implications for patterns in primary production". Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 72 (11): 1663–1671. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2015-0187. hdl:1807/69824.
  8. ^ Carpenter, Stephen R.; Cole, Jonathan J.; Kitchell, James F.; Pace, Michael L. (1998). "Impact of dissolved organic carbon, phosphorus, and grazing on phytoplankton biomass and production in experimental lakes". Limnology and Oceanography. 43 (1): 73–80. doi:10.4319/lo.1998.43.1.0073. ISSN 1939-5590.
  9. ^ Hansson, Lars-Anders (1992). "Factors regulating periphytic algal biomass". Limnology and Oceanography. 37 (2): 322–328. Bibcode:1992LimOc..37..322H. doi:10.4319/lo.1992.37.2.0322. ISSN 1939-5590.
  10. ^ Kelly, Patrick T.; Solomon, Christopher T.; Zwart, Jacob A.; Jones, Stuart E. (2018-11-01). "A Framework for Understanding Variation in Pelagic Gross Primary Production of Lake Ecosystems". Ecosystems. 21 (7): 1364–1376. doi:10.1007/s10021-018-0226-4. ISSN 1435-0629. S2CID 31266760.
  11. ^ a b Lapierre, Jean-Francois; Collins, Sarah M.; Seekell, David A.; Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence; Tan, Pang-Ning; Skaff, Nicholas K.; Taranu, Zofia E.; Fergus, C. Emi; Soranno, Patricia A. (2018). "Similarity in spatial structure constrains ecosystem relationships: Building a macroscale understanding of lakes". Global Ecology and Biogeography. 27 (10): 1251–1263. doi:10.1111/geb.12781. ISSN 1466-8238.
  12. ^ Lapierre, Jean-Francois; Seekell, David A.; Giorgio, Paul A. del (2015). "Climate and landscape influence on indicators of lake carbon cycling through spatial patterns in dissolved organic carbon". Global Change Biology. 21 (12): 4425–4435. Bibcode:2015GCBio..21.4425L. doi:10.1111/gcb.13031. ISSN 1365-2486. PMID 26150108. S2CID 205142736.
  13. ^ Seekell, David A.; Lapierre, Jean-François; Pace, Michael L.; Gudasz, Cristian; Sobek, Sebastian; Tranvik, Lars J. (2014). "Regional-scale variation of dissolved organic carbon concentrations in Swedish lakes". Limnology and Oceanography. 59 (5): 1612–1620. Bibcode:2014LimOc..59.1612S. doi:10.4319/lo.2014.59.5.1612. ISSN 1939-5590.
  14. ^ Sommaruga, Ruben (2001-09-01). "The role of solar UV radiation in the ecology of alpine lakes". Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 62 (1–2): 35–42. doi:10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00154-3. ISSN 1011-1344. PMID 11693365.
  15. ^ Helms, John R.; Stubbins, Aaron; Perdue, E. Michael; Green, Nelson W.; Chen, Hongmei; Mopper, Kenneth (2013). "Photochemical bleaching of oceanic dissolved organic matter and its effect on absorption spectral slope and fluorescence". Marine Chemistry. 155: 81–91. Bibcode:2013MarCh.155...81H. doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2013.05.015.
  16. ^ "What is an Excitation Emission Matrix (EEM)?". Horiba. Retrieved 17 December 2019.
  17. ^ Beckmann, Christian. "Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC)". Retrieved 17 December 2019.