This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Digital anthropology" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Part of a series on
Anthropology of nature,
science and technology
Basic concepts
Related articles
Major theorists
Social and cultural anthropology
Part of a series on
Anthropology
Types
Archaeological
Biological
Linguistic
Research framework
Key concepts
Key theories
Lists

Digital anthropology is the anthropological study of the relationship between humans and digital-era technology. The field is new, and thus has a variety of names with a variety of emphases. These include techno-anthropology,[1] digital ethnography, cyberanthropology,[2] and virtual anthropology.[3]

Definition and scope

Most anthropologists who use the phrase "digital anthropology" are specifically referring to online and Internet technology. The study of humans' relationship to a broader range of technology may fall under other subfields of anthropological study, such as cyborg anthropology.

The Digital Anthropology Group (DANG) is classified as an interest group in the American Anthropological Association. DANG's mission includes promoting the use of digital technology as a tool of anthropological research, encouraging anthropologists to share research using digital platforms, and outlining ways for anthropologists to study digital communities.

Cyberspace or the "virtual world" itself can serve as a "field" site for anthropologists, allowing the observation, analysis, and interpretation of the sociocultural phenomena springing up and taking place in any interactive space.

National and transnational communities, enabled by digital technology, establish a set of social norms, practices, traditions, storied history and associated collective memory,[4] migration periods, internal and external conflicts, potentially subconscious language features[5][6] and memetic dialects comparable to those of traditional, geographically confined communities. This includes the various communities built around free and open-source software, online platforms such as Facebook, Twitter/X, Instagram, 4chan and Reddit and their respective sub-sites, and politically motivated groups like Anonymous, WikiLeaks, or the Occupy movement.[7]

A number of academic anthropologists have conducted traditional ethnographies of virtual worlds, such as Bonnie Nardi's study of World of Warcraft[8] or Tom Boellstorff's study of Second Life.[9] Academic Gabriella Coleman has done ethnographic work on the Debian software community[10] and the Anonymous hacktivist network.[11] Theorist Nancy Mauro-Flude conducts ethnographic field work on computing arts and computer subcultures such as systerserver.net a part of the communities of feminist web servers [12] and the Feminist Internet network.[13] Eitan Y. Wilf examines the intersection of artists' creativity and digital technology and artificial intelligence.[14] Yongming Zhou studied how in China the internet is used to participate in politics.[15] Eve M. Zucker and colleagues study the shift to digital memorialization of mass atrocities and the emergent role of artificial intelligence in these processes.[4][16] Victoria Bernal conducted ethnographic research on the themes of nationalism and citizenship among Eritreans participating in online political engagement with their homeland.[17]

Anthropological research can help designers adapt and improve technology. Australian anthropologist Genevieve Bell did extensive user experience research at Intel that informed the company's approach to its technology, users, and market.[18]

Methodology

Digital fieldwork

Many digital anthropologists who study online communities use traditional methods of anthropological research. They participate in online communities in order to learn about their customs and worldviews, and back their observations with private interviews, historical research, and quantitative data. Their product is an ethnography, a qualitative description of their experience and analyses.

Other anthropologists and social scientists have conducted research that emphasizes data gathered by websites and servers. However, academics often have trouble accessing user data on the same scale as social media corporations like Facebook and data mining companies like Acxiom.

In terms of method, there is a disagreement in whether it is possible to conduct research exclusively online or if research will only be complete when the subjects are studied holistically, both online and offline. Tom Boellstorff, who conducted a three-year research as an avatar in the virtual world Second Life, defends the first approach, stating that it is not just possible, but necessary to engage with subjects “in their own terms”.[19][citation needed][20] Others, such as Daniel Miller, have argued that an ethnographic research should not exclude learning about the subject's life outside the internet.[9]

Digital technology as a tool of anthropology

The American Anthropological Association offers an online guide for students using digital technology to store and share data. Data can be uploaded to digital databases to be stored, shared, and interpreted. Text and numerical analysis software can help produce metadata, while a codebook may help organize data.

Ethics

Online fieldwork offers new ethical challenges. According to the American Anthropological Association's ethics guidelines, anthropologists researching a community must make sure that all members of that community know they are being studied and have access to data the anthropologist produces. However, many online communities' interactions are publicly available for anyone to read, and may be preserved online for years. Digital anthropologists debate the extent to which lurking in online communities and sifting through public archives is ethical.[21]

The Association also asserts that anthropologists' ability to collect and store data at all is "a privilege", and researchers have an ethical duty to store digital data responsibly. This means protecting the identity of participants, sharing data with other anthropologists, and making backup copies of all data.[22]

Prominent figures

See also

References

Notes

  1. ^ "Techno-Anthropology course guide". Aalborg University. Retrieved 14 March 2013.
  2. ^ Knorr, Alexander (August 2011). Cyberanthropology. Peter Hammer Verlag Gmbh. ISBN 978-3779503590. Retrieved March 14, 2013.
  3. ^ Weber, Gerhard; Bookstein, Fred (2011). Virtual Anthropology: A guide to a new interdisciplinary field. Springer. ISBN 978-3211486474.
  4. ^ a b Zucker, Eve Monique; Simon, David J. (2020). Mass Violence and Memory in the Digital Age: memorialization unmoored. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. ISBN 978-3-030-39395-3.
  5. ^ Word usage mirrors community structure in the online social network Twitter, EPJ Data Science, 25 February 2013
  6. ^ Rodrigues, Jason (15 March 2013). "Twitter users forming tribes with own language, tweet analysis shows". The Guardian.
  7. ^ "Abstract of 'The social construction of freedom in free and open source software: Hackers, ethics, and the liberal tradition'". FlossHub. Archived from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 11 March 2013.
  8. ^ Nardi, Bonnie (2010). My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. University of Michigan Press. ISBN 978-0472050987.
  9. ^ a b Boellstorff, Tom (2010). Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691146270.
  10. ^ Coleman, Gabriella (2010). "The Hacker Conference: A Ritual Condensation and Celebration of a Lifeworld". Anthropological Quarterly. 83 (1): 47–72. doi:10.1353/anq.0.0112. ISSN 0003-5491. JSTOR 20638699. S2CID 142356750.
  11. ^ Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, hoaxer, whistleblower, spy: The many faces of Anonymous. Verso Books. https://ashkanyeganeh.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/hacker-hoaxer-whistleblower-spy.pdf
  12. ^ Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2022). 2021243?journalCode=ncdn20 "A feminist server stack". Codesign. 18 (1): 48–62. doi:10.1080/15710882.2021.2021243. ISSN 1571-0882. S2CID 245719879. ((cite journal)): Check |url= value (help)
  13. ^ Mauro-Flude, n. (2021). Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2021). "Chthonian Feminist Internet Theory for the twenty first century". Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies. 35 (1): 788–804. doi:10.1080/10304312.2021.1983260. ISSN 1469-3666. S2CID 244577481.
  14. ^ Wilf, Eitan Y. The Inspiration Machine: Computational Creativity in Poetry and Jazz. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  15. ^ Zhou, Yongming (2006). Historicizing Online Politics: Telegraphy, the Internet, and Political Participation in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-5127-8.
  16. ^ Makhortykh, Mykola; Zucker, Eve M.; Simon, David J.; Bultmann, Daniel; Ulloa, Roberto (2023-07-18). "Shall androids dream of genocides? How generative AI can change the future of memorialization of mass atrocities". Discover Artificial Intelligence. 3 (1): 28. arXiv:2305.14358. doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00072-6. ISSN 2731-0809.
  17. ^ Bernal, Victoria. Nation as Network: Diaspora, Cyberspace, and Citizenship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  18. ^ "Intel's cultural anthropologist".
  19. ^ Boellstorff, Tom (2015-12-31). Coming of Age in Second Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400874101. ISBN 978-1-4008-7410-1.
  20. ^ Boellstorff, Tom (2021). Digital Anthropology (2nd ed.). California: Routledge. pp. 39–60. ISBN 9781350078840.
  21. ^ Varis, Piia (2014). "Digital Ethnography". Tilburg Papers in Cultural Studies: 1–21 – via Tilburg University.
  22. ^ "Digital Data Management - Cultural Module - Learn and Teach". www.americananthro.org. Retrieved 2017-01-30.

Bibliography

External links

Science and technology studies
Categories