This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Richard Lazarus" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. (March 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (March 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Transactional Model of Stress and Coping of Richard Lazarus
Transactional Model of Stress and Coping of Richard Lazarus

Richard S. Lazarus (March 3, 1922 – November 24, 2002) was an American psychologist who began rising to prominence in the 1960s, when behaviorists like B. F. Skinner held sway over psychology and explanations for human behavior were often pared down to rudimentary motives like reward and punishment. A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Lazarus as the 80th most cited psychologist of the 20th century.[1]

He was well renowned for his theory of cognitive-mediational theory within emotion.[2]

Career

After graduating from City College of New York and the University of Pittsburgh, Lazarus joined the faculty at the University of California, Berkeley in 1959.[3]

During the 1970s, Lazarus worked with PhD student Susan Folkman studying stress and coping. In her doctoral thesis, Folkman coined the terms "problem-focused coping" and "emotion-focused coping."[4] Lazarus and Folkman co-authored a book called "Stress, Appraisal and Coping" in 1984, which worked through the theory of psychological stress, using concepts of Cognitive appraisal and coping.[5][6] In this book, they were the first to make the distinction between "problem-focused coping" and "emotion-focused coping" which could result in consequences for both physical and mental health.[7] They described "emotion-focused coping" as dealing with stress by regulating one's emotions and "problem-focused coping" as "directly changing the elements of the stressful situation".[8]

Research

Lazarus advocated the importance of emotion, especially what he described as the marriage between emotion and thought.[9] His views put him at odds not only with behaviorism but also with a movement that began toward the end of his career: attempts to explain all human behavior by looking at the structure of the brain.[citation needed] He was very opposed to reductionist approaches to understanding human behavior.

Lazarus' cognitive-mediational theory maintained that the interaction between emotion-eliciting conditions and coping processes affect the cognitions that drive emotional reactions.[2] For example, the degree of a perceived threat affects an individual's emotional and psychological response to such life events in the future.[10] At the heart of Lazarus's theory was what he called appraisal. Before emotion occurs, he argued, people make an automatic, often unconscious, assessment of what is happening and what it may mean for them or those they care about. From that perspective, emotion becomes not just rational but a necessary component of survival. According to Lazarus, there are two kinds of appraisal: primary appraisal, which is aimed at establishing the significance of an event's meaning to the organism; and, secondary appraisal, which assesses the ability of the organism to cope with the consequences of the event.[2]

Lazarus worked on topics such as hope and gratitude. He was perhaps best known for his work on coping, gaining attention for studies that showed that patients who engaged in denial about the seriousness of their situation did better than those who were more "realistic." He also found that stress often had less to do with a person's actual situation than with how the person perceived the strength of his own resources.[11]

Emotion definition

Lazarus (1991) defines emotions according to 'core relational themes' which are intuitive summaries of the 'moral appraisals' (e.g. of relevance, goal conduciveness) involved in different emotions. These themes help define both the function and eliciting conditions of the emotion. They include:

Known publications

References

  1. ^ Haggbloom, Steven J.; Warnick, Renee; Warnick, Jason E.; Jones, Vinessa K.; Yarbrough, Gary L.; Russell, Tenea M.; Borecky, Chris M.; McGahhey, Reagan; Powell III, John L.; Beavers, Jamie; Monte, Emmanuelle (2002). "The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century". Review of General Psychology. 6 (2): 139–152. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.139. S2CID 145668721.
  2. ^ a b c Scherer, Klaus R.; Schorr, Angela; Johnstone, Tom (2001). Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-19-535154-5.
  3. ^ "Psychologist Richard Lazarus dies". Marysville Appeal Democrat. California. December 6, 2002.icon of an open green padlock
  4. ^ Alan J. Christensen; Joshua Morrison Smyth; René Martin (January 16, 2014). Encyclopedia of Health Psychology. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 111. ISBN 9780387225579. Retrieved January 29, 2020.
  5. ^ Beck, Gayle J. (1986). "Review of Stress, appraisal, and coping [Review of the book Stress, Appraisal, and Coping". Health Psychology. 5 (5): 497–500. doi:10.1037/h0090854.
  6. ^ Love, John M. (1985). "Review of Stress, appraisal and coping and The coping capacity: On the nature of being mortal". American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 55 (4): 629–632. doi:10.1037/h0098844.
  7. ^ Hyman, Carol (December 4, 2002). "Richard Lazarus, UC Berkeley psychology faculty member and influential researcher, dies at 80". berkeley.edu. Retrieved January 29, 2020.
  8. ^ Sophie Berjot; Nicolas Gillet (2011). "Stress and Coping with Discrimination and Stigmatization". Frontiers in Psychology. 2 (33): 33. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00033. PMC 3110961. PMID 21713247.
  9. ^ Sierhuis, Freya (2016). Passions and Subjectivity in Early Modern Culture. Oxon: Routledge. p. 2. ISBN 978-1-4724-1364-2.
  10. ^ Gohary, Osmo Otto Paivio Hanninen; Mustafa Atalay; B. P. Mansourian; A. Wojtezak; S. M. Mahfouz; Harry Majewski; Elaine Elisabetsky; Nina L. Etkin; Ralph Kirby; T. G. Downing and M. I. El (2010). MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES - Volume V. London: EOLSS Publications. p. 64. ISBN 978-1-84826-835-7.
  11. ^ "LISTSERV 16.0 - Archives - Error".
  12. ^ Lazarus, Richard S.; Dadsetan, Parirokh; Jahangiri, Hamideh (2018). Stress Treatment and Management. Lap Lambert. ISBN 978-613-9-44797-8.
  13. ^ Lazarus, Richard S.; Dadsetan, Parirokh; Jahangiri, Hamideh (2018). Stress Treatment and Management. Lap Lambert. ISBN 978-613-9-45532-4.