Acrisure Stadium was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wasn't this stadium a controversial last-minute change of mind by the state? Because the Eagles were set to get a new stadium way before the Steelers had plans of getting a new one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartan9199 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't the three AFC championship games (ending the 2001 and 2004 seasons and sending the 2008 team to the Superbowl) be mentioned considering those were probably the three biggest events in the stadium's history thus far? 65.207.69.2 (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
I just want to be clear here, as there is a slow edit war going on by an anonymous IP, to make sure there is consensus about the meaning and definition of "tenants" regarding its use in athletic facility infoboxes. Tenants, as is precedent in every existing Wikipedia article about sports facilities, as well as the understood meaning and definition of the word, refer to past or current permanent tenants who play their home games at the facilities, and not one-time events, like concerts or the Winter Classic, etc. Does anyone disagree? CrazyPaco (talk) 18:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Succession boxes exists for all tenants. One editor insists that only the Pitt Panther succession box should be removed because it falls under the authority of the College Football Wikiproject. No authority exists for any one Wikiproject nor does such a policy exist across Wikipedia. Removing the box leaves the Events and Tenants listing incomplete. Please leave your commentary about whether it is appropriate to remove the Pitt Panthers or other succession boxes for this article. CrazyPaco (talk) 23:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
The "Field design" section conatins no references. Could one of the regular editors of the article look into this as it is likely to fail the GA criteria if it is not fixed. AIRcorn (talk) 00:59, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
In regards to the name of the Architect, in 2009, the HOK Sport group bought itself out in its entirety[1] – taking its portfolio of work and staff with it, and rebranding as Populous. As part of the buyout agreement from HOK, Populous had full claim to the portfolio of work done while under the HOK Moniker. HOK is not/was not allowed to claim any of those projects as their own.
In 2014, five years after the buyout was complete, HOK chose to re-enter the sports architecture space, acquiring another architecture firm, 360[2]. In turn, with the reemergence of a new company called HOK Sport, providing clarity in what company can actually claim this as their own work would be beneficial to the article and its readers. Hence rallying for the change from HOK Sport to Populous (then HOK Sport). The HOK Sport of today is not the same HOK Sport that completed this project and this change will minimize confusion for readers. If you click through to the Populous Wikipedia page, readers will be able to see the detailed firm history of Populous – including information on the buyout.
I'm aware that there are guidelines about editing pages if there is a potential conflict of interest, so I would like to disclose here that these contributions are made on behalf of Populous and in employment with them, and I intend to follow all of Wikipedia's guidelines, including those on WP:COI, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:NPOV, very closely. My aim is to work with and seek advice from impartial editors to make positive contributions to Populous' article and projects, hopefully leading to improved articles. Brianfolkers (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Heinz Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Heinz Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.nwgetz.com/stadiums_heinz.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Heinz Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_69007.html((dead link))
tag to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_55678.html((dead link))
tag to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribunereview/s_551295.html((dead link))
tag to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/living/s_331572.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Currently, the top picture in the infobox is captioned "Acrisure Stadium in 2020" -- however, since it did not become Acrisure Stadium until 2022, this seems incorrect. In 2020, it was Heinz Field, and so the picture is of Heinz Field, not Acrisure stadium (indeed, the Heinz logo is visible on the front of the stadium in the picture).
If possible, we should replace the picture with one taken since the rebranding and reflecting the new name, but for now, we should change the caption to be correct. Waidawut (talk) 17:50, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Snow close, consensus is clearly opposed. ––FormalDude talk 15:30, 23 July 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Acrisure Stadium → Heinz Field – Per COMMONNAME, reliable sources still primarily refer to the stadium as "Heinz Field", and that is clearly the most popular search term for the article. ––FormalDude talk 19:21, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A GA from 2008. There are uncited areas like the entirety of the field design section and the last two paragraphs of the seating expansion. Also, the prose is very choppy in a lot a places with multiple 1-2 sentence paragraphs. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
With just one intelligible swoop of a pen makes Heinz Field non-existent? Obviously that makes all memories shared there with family and friends also non-existent? Your pen and money doesn’t make you God. No one from Pittsburgh will EVER call that stadium anything but HEINZ FIELD BurghinBoston (talk) 09:07, 13 December 2023 (UTC)