The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Bird Names for Birds is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more) Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more) Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more) Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more) NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more) Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more) Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more) Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more) Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. Black Lives Matter Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Sociology: Social Movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the social movements task force. United States: History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance).

On 26 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Eponymous Bird Name. The result of the discussion was not moved.

There's a few unsourced statements in this article that I'm skeptical of.

• "follows years of unsuccessful proposals to replace common names that honor anti-abolitionist and Confederate figures, or historic figures with a legacy of oppression against indigenous people." What proposals are being referenced here? As far as I can see the only proposal that matches this description is the 2018 Mccown's Longspur proposal. I don't think the AOS has ever received any other proposals to remove eponyms for this kind of reason.
• "With few exceptions, previous proposals to NACC to address problematic common bird names—such as the Maui parrotbill or the Inca dove—remained unsuccessful." Beyond the examples of Oldsquaw, Maui Parrotbill and Inca Dove, are there any more? This statement seems odd if it's really just that 2 out of 3 proposals ever submitted have been rejected. Moreover the proposal for Inca Dove does not mention anything related ot diversity/inclusion/etc., nor do the responses so it's unclear why it's included here.
• "When they did, like in the case of the long-tailed duck (formerly known as oldsquaw, a name with derogatory references to indigenous people), NACC stated that equity, diversity and inclusion considerations were not part of the decision." Again, this implies that this is part of a trend, with other similar cases. Are there other similar cases?

I suspect this is just exaggeration, but maybe there is actually some basis for these statements? Am I missing something?Somatochlora (talk) 16:56, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A few points that seem true to me:

• Most of this page is not about the "bird names for birds" organization, but about a broader movement/event/controversy
• The title "bird names for birds" does not really describe the contents of the article
• The organization "bird names for birds" is probably not notable. As far as I can tell, the only source used for this page that mentions the phrase "bird names for birds", that is not their own website or written by one of their founders, is this piece in Science: https://www.science.org/content/article/reversal-ornithologists-yank-confederate-general-s-name-bird. The articles in NYT, the official AOS statement etc. never mention the organization
• As such, ascribing these changes to BNFB seems like synthesis
• The actual topic of this page is clearly notable and deserves an article given the multiple articles in big publications about it

I think this page should be moved to something like "Bird name change controversies" (open to suggestions, I don't love using the word "controversies" but don't have a better idea), and rewritten to remove the emphasis on this specific organization. I can see this being controversial so wanted to leave this here and see if anyone has opinions before making any changes. Somatochlora (talk) 20:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]