This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Geographic coordinate system is of interest to WikiProject Geographical coordinates, which encourages the use of geographical coordinates in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Geographical coordinatesWikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinatesTemplate:WikiProject Geographical coordinatesGeographical coordinates articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
I see a bit too many reverts, which I suggest end. There are some useful and unuseful bits, so I don't want to add add another revert. Here are a few notes:
Use of en dash for "west–east" is correct (MOS:ENDASH), so keep these edits.
There is no primary English variation for this article. Not sure what's best: use all US English, use all British English, or mixed, as this is a globally-focused article. I think it is OK to have it mixed in context, as it was before. So use British English for "but neighbouring Scotland" and American English for "cartographical organization include the North American Datum". More on this MOS:ENGVAR.
The top of the talk page contains a US English template. Presumably the UK spelling snuck in after the template was added.Jc3s5h (talk) 21:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The diagram is for ECEF, which is not geodetic coordinates. As stated in the article,
The Earth-centered Earth-fixed (also known as the ECEF, ECF, or conventional terrestrial coordinate system) rotates with the Earth and has its origin at the center of the Earth.
The name of this page can be confusing, as the specific term GCS is commonly used only for the spherical (lat/lon) coordinates, as opposed to planar or projected coordinate systems (e.g., in ArcGIS and some textbooks). The generic term is just "coordinate system" in geography, so perhaps it should be Coordinate System (Geography), with a section or separate page focusing on GCS (lat/lon). That said, I've always thought such a co-option of the generic term GCS for one type is unfortunate, but it is not my decision. Maybe we should just follow the crowd and start calling lat/lon "GPS coordinates" ;-) Bplewe (talk) 16:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Bplewe has not offered sufficient proof, with citations to reliable sources, that the term "geographic coordinate system" only applies to latitude and longitude, and excludes other terrestrial coordinates such as projected coordinates, Cartesian coordinates coordinates etc. Also, it is not clear tom me that "Coordinate System (Geography)" would be any better than "Geographic coordinate system".
Support. “Geographic coordinate system” as used in GIS these days refers to spherical coordinates with a datum. I think this is an Esri convention that has pretty much taken over. The literature, historically, refers to “geographic(al) coordinates” (without “system”) to mean latitude and longitude; no such term as “geographical coordinate system” seems to have been in common use before GIS. Yes, we need references, but the reference will support this change. Strebe (talk) 19:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's not clear that we should decide only on the basis of GIS nomenclature. Some other points of view are astronomy and geography as an academic subject. Looking around, I discovered that Earth-centered, Earth-fixed coordinate system essentially covers (or should cover) the same material, but is a bit more astronomy-oriented. The two articles should probably be merged. Jc3s5h (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If the term “geographic coordinate system” was not defined before it came into use in GIS, and is in use nowhere else, then I think we should decide “only on the basis of GIS nomenclature”. The closest I can find routinely in the literature before GIS is “geographic coordinate(s)”, which always seems to refer to latitude/longitude. I don’t think ECEF the should get merged with this one. The ECEF article is woefully incomplete and inadequate; I think it should get fleshed out. Strebe (talk) 01:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree with not changing the terminology solely because ArcGIS does so, and thanks Daan for making me do my homework (and also thanks for being the watchdog over this subdiscipline, every one should have someone as conscientious). There does seem to be an emerging consensus, encapsulated in EPSG, ISO 19111 and the corresponding OGC AS-2, and I would propose that we should conform to their terminology as the baseline. As annoyed as I am about the confusing way that ArcGIS uses these terms in its interface, it does technically conform to these standards. These all define the following (OGC AS-2 Section 9):
Coordinate system is a generic term for a framework for measuring locations, not necessarily geographic
Coordinate reference system is a standardized coordinate system for measuring geographic locations, a coordinate system along with a choice of horizontal datum. Spatial reference system is also used a lot here.
Geographic CRS measures location using ellipsoidal coordinates (lat/lon on a choice of ellipsoid model, maybe + HAE)
One often sees e.g. +/-Y° and +/-X° instead of °N/S and °E/W.
If there are one or more standards for this, I think it might be helpful to discuss this topic on the page. 142.92.29.46 (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not off the top of my head. But I have encountered it in the past. I came here looking to confirm which is "standard" (I think + is usually N and E) and found nothing. 142.92.29.45 (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Found one. Look at the +/- values given for lat/lon here: