body.skin-vector-2022 .mw-parser-output .skiptotalk,body.mw-mf .mw-parser-output .skiptotalk{display:none}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a{display:block;text-align:center;font-style:italic;line-height:1.9}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::before,.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::after{content:"↓";font-size:larger;line-height:1.6;font-style:normal}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::before{float:left}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::after{float:right}Skip to table of contents
Former featured articleKu Klux Klan is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 22, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
August 26, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
October 31, 2006Featured article reviewKept
May 9, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 24, 2004, December 24, 2005, December 24, 2006, December 24, 2007, December 24, 2009, December 24, 2012, and December 24, 2015.
Current status: Former featured article

Typo - Terry Venable.[edit]

Can someone correct the typo regarding the South African Chapter of the Klan, it refers to the activist who tried to set up the KKK at Rhodes University as "Terry Venables", but that is the name of the English football player and manager - the correct spelling should be "Terry Venable" (no S) and someone with editing privileges should make this change as soon as possible. this correct spelling can be confirmed by reference to the cited source: [1]https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Revolutionaries_for_the_Right/_JhVDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Terry+Venable%22+KKK&pg=PA53&printsec=frontcover Duckwalk71 (talk) 15:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Opening paragraph- "Their primary targets are African Americans, Hispanics, Jews, Latinos, Asian Americans, Native Americans, Italian Americans, Irish Americans, and Catholics, as well as immigrants, leftists, homosexuals, Muslims, atheists, and abortion providers."

Can we just change the sentence to say their "primary targets" are African Americans, who pretty much everybody considers to be the "primary enemy" of the Klan? I believe the sentence just listed African Americans as the "primary enemy" until about four years ago, when somebody added those zillion other groups to the list. The current sentence has an extremely long list of people and it's kind of hard to comprehend the sentence or keep track of all those enemies. Saying that African Americans are the "primary enemy" of the Klan isn't the same thing as saying they're the Klan's only enemy.

And I'm not sure that the Klan actually hates all of those groups. The "third" Klan from the 1950s to the present has abandoned anti-Catholicism (and actually the "first" Klan of the 1860s wasn't anti-Catholic either- only the "second" Klan of the 1920s was). I really haven't seen a lot of evidence to suggest that the Klan has ever viewed atheists or abortion providers as an enemy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidude87654321 (talkcontribs) 00:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References starting at 39[edit]

Is there a reason why the in-text reference numbers don't start at one? They start at 39/40.

- Ambndms (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant sentence?[edit]

The Klan is described as "the first organized terror movement in American history" twice in the article, both sentences being very close to each other. The first use of this descriptor is in the lede, and the second is in the third paragraph. Is there a way we can make this less redundant? JohnR1Roberts (talk) 22:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See edit
 Done DN (talk) 23:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 February 2024[edit]

in "origin of the name", change "probably" to "likely" 108.189.72.130 (talk) 16:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: no reason given for the proposed change. M.Bitton (talk) 18:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2024[edit]

The Wiki article states that the Klu Klux Klan was a far right extremist group. That is historically and categorically false as it was founded BY Confederate Nathan Bedford Forrest AS a white supremacist Democrat organisation. And remained as such into the early to mid 1900s. To say otherwise would be to intentionally spread misinformation. Facts are objective. To assume they are subjective in order to manipulate them is disingenuous at best. [2] 2604:61C0:2800:CA20:D901:9FE4:7E83:5A55 (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Much of this is wrong. I'm also not sure what you're proposing. Edit requests are for either uncontroversial fixes or changes that have consensus. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Probably time for an FAQ to explain to those who bother to look at it that political parties have exchanged positions and members over the past 150 years, and that what might have been plausible in the late 19th century and the early 20th century is now a fallacy, given the intentional strategies of the parties to on one hand reject this kind of organization and the other to move in their direction. Acroterion (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]