This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Converted from a redirect by Rhain (talk). Self-nominated at 02:19, 8 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Please Hold to My Hand; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]
The article is new enough, long enough, referenced, neutral and no copyvio obvious. The hooks are sourced and interesting. The image here is free and clear, and the other images in the article are either free or fair use. QPQ done. Corachow (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
1. Its pretty close to all of the criteria
2. Earwig doesnt bring up and major problems, a few things that come up are quotes that have to be verbatim.
3. No maintence tags.
4. Page is stable, no persistent vandalism .
5. No previous nominations
✓Pass
I have randomly selected sources 14, 17 and 41 for a spot check. (based on this revision [1])
While looking over the sources I found a use of Kotaku from 2023 which is after they begun using ai. WP:VGRS says that not all post 2023 articles are unrelialbe and should be examined on a case by case basis. So I will looking into the article to take a look, then posting it to WP:RSN
Kotaku and Metro after brining it up here it was deemed that in this context the Kotaku and Metro sources are okay to be used here.
Madeline Carpou of The Mary Sue felt its inclusion reflected Ellie's character arc: her actions in the episode set her down a path towards the events of Part II.
Proven by source: A good bit of the article that praises the two.
Backed up by other sources: It was paried with two other sources that also praised the preformance
The plot section is 380 words twenty under the 400 word limit.
Stays on topic for the whole thing the closet to a tangent would be the the end of the "Conception and writing" section but even then it still connects back.
Nothing seems to praisy. I would note that in "critical reception" it says "Lynskey's performance received praise" then shows three reviews prasing her. The article then details some of the praise where half of the selected examples are somewhat negative. I have slightly adjusted the language.
The page uses 5 images they are: A still frame from the episode(free use), an image of Hank Williams (commons), an image of Melanie Lynskey (commons), an image of Pedro Pascal (commons), and an image of Bella Ramsey (commons).
The still is fairly used and attributed. It is a key moment of the episode
Hank Williams I understand the use of as his song is important to the episode. I would say use an image related to the song and not Williams but as there is no images for it, its fine.
The images of Lynskey, Pascal, and Ramsey are all from Commons. I would argue against all three of them but I struggle on deciding who I would recommend to cut so I would say just leave it.