This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
RAF Fylingdales is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
"Even though it still does not appear on any map". Wrong. It's on the CAA's aviation map, surrounded by a big HIRTA (High-Intensity Radio Transmissions Area). It's impossible to miss!BaseTurnComplete20:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The statement would have been true back in the 1980s as Mrs Thatcher had all MoD sites, such as RAF airfields, AWRE Aldermaston, etc., taken off of Ordnance Survey maps, as she thought they might be used for targeting the installations. This was more to do with an attempt to hinder political demonstrators from staging sit-ins at these sorts of places, than with making things difficult for the Soviets, who, presumably, just looked at their older maps of Britain when deciding where to aim any ICBMS.
I do not know Latin, but I believe Vigilamus more accurately translates to "We stand guard". This would be consistent with the Canadian land forces motto, Vigilamus Pro Te meaning "We Stand on Guard for Thee". Is there anyone that knows Latin that would care to comment? 82.2.32.67 (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:RAF Fylingdales/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
Requires infobox Done
Switch existing references to use one of the ((Cite)) templates and attach to appropriate text so you know which bit comes from which reference
I have just modified one external link on RAF Fylingdales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
Old references to ICNIRP/NRPB field strength limits[edit]
The section mentioning UK and EU limits on radiation field strength appears to be based on Yorkshire CND website which in turn goes back to 2008 statements about the difference between ICNIRP and NRPB limits. There appears to be no independent citations which mention whether current UK legal requirements are relying on NRPB alone, nor whether these old and non-independent sources remain valid citations.
194.53.185.222 (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agree the whole controversy section appears to be outdated, it should be mentioned that CND are not happy but slimmed down a bit with regard to due weight and the lack of recent activity. MilborneOne (talk) 17:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: