This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RS-24 Yars article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How on Earth ballistic missile can be "thermonuclear"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.173.131 (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
The image was that of Topol-M mobile TEL, so I deleted it.Profhobby 16:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
What makes this missile able to evade defences? 213.48.15.234 14:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
1. It is manuevering on the trajectory.
2. It's warheads are created using stealth technology.
3. It's boost phase is very small compared even to other solid fuel missiles.
4. It's warheads manuevere on intermeadiate phase and in terminal phase, and in intermediate phase they fly at hypersonic speeds, much faster than any other missile's warheads. And of course in terminal phase they are sflying like any otehr warheads, with speds of 10 times the sound or 13, I don't rememeber, in addition, trhey are manuevering.
5. It is said to be protected against latest laser technology.
When a warhead is manuevering at high speeds, you can not determine where it is going, and hence you can not send an interceptor. Even if you would send an interceptor, where is the guarantee that warheads will not do evasive manuever around it, or that warheads will be in the place where you sent interceptor.
The missiles of this family: Topol M, Iskander, and now the newest RS-24 are unique, no other country has them.
And about photograph, unless someone will sneak in to russian secret domcuments, make a photo and post it here, we will not see the missile for a long time.
74.98.216.68 02:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Pavel Golikov. 10:52, 12 June 2007.
If we know that we could determain the speed, very roughly :)
According to russianforces.org it's almost certainly a modified Topol-M. 58.161.121.237 13:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
A MIRVed Topol-M it is.
http://russianforces.org/blog/2007/09/solomonov_confirms_that_rs24_i.shtml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.121.103 (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
http://gx.people.com.cn/media/200705/30/NewsMedia_55914.jpg (RS-24 image?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.150.140 (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I am from Russian Federation. I claim you to delete (remove) this article because it is top secret military informations (data). Sorry for my very bad English Language. 85.140.35.82 (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC) Russ_boy
Ok, here is a video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtdCibNfbWI&feature=related
The person speaking is the main developer of this missile, Solomonov. Quote from video:
"If we are talking about how much this missile is changed compared to it's analog, Topol M, it is about half a missile new" He says it from 0:31 to 0:40.
So, I hope we are settled with questions about it being Topol m? 99.231.46.37 (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Pavel Golikov.
The missile has much in common with the normal Topol-M. Thus, much of the information about Topol-M is also valid for RS-24. Wouldn't it be a good idea to merge these two articles? Otherwise we will have to duplicate info. Offliner (talk) 18:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Rephrased references to missile shield which has since been abandoned.
http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB125317801774419047.html
66.112.225.187 (talk) 04:43, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Are there any reliable sources/information as to what the actual throwweight of this contraption may be?
If the missile is, as has been stated, merely a *slightly* upgraded Topol-M, its throwweight of 1300-1400kg or so would be barely enough to support a *couple* of 550kt strategic warheads, nowhere near 10. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.211.74.250 (talk) 19:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
According to this article there's a new missile undergoing launch test that is said to be "a successor to ICBMs like the Topol-M". Should there be some mention of it in the present article? __meco (talk) 19:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Someone has currently changed the warhead yield to read '100 megatone'. Not only is this spelt wrong, but no weapon of that yield has ever been produced, even going up to H-bombs weighing several tons. I don't claim to know what the yield will be (6x550kT sounds sensible), but 100 megatons is definitely wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z07x10 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
The Mach values are useless without further specifications.
There is no medium in space, which carrys sound. --94.114.40.212 (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on RS-24 Yars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)