This article was nominated for deletion on August 2, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The information regarding net wealth of Mr. Wazed is nothing but a propaganda. All so called reference links of that information are from personal blog site and are totally fake. There is no authentic source of any public disclosure of Mr. Wazeds net wealth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushantaa (talk • contribs) 11:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
To Ragib, How am i violating anything by putting up a picture? I put up the picture twice last month and you removed it. You even went as far as blocking my IP address on wikipedia. What is this bullshit? I clearly have every right to put up a picture becoz the image box clearly says that I can put up a picture if i have one. And you have no right to block my IP address for that cz i clearly haven't violated any wikipedia policies by putting by the picture of Sajeeb Wazed. Please give me elaborate reasons why u blocked my IP address for such a long time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazaan (talk • contribs) 13:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
what kind of bio is this?
Why has this been nominated for speedy deletion? The subject has clear notability. If the article needs improvement (eg adding reliable sources), improve it. Recurring dreams 02:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
OK, I've done my fourth revert, but I think this is clearly libelous material and should be removed. I have posted my concerns at the WP:BLP noticeboard, and raised the user's conduct at WP:AIV. The source given is essentially an attack piece from a magazine, and the user is clearly using language that violates WP:NPOV. Until these concerns are addressed I don't think the material should be included. Recurring dreams 07:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
How is it libelous if the facts are in public record? The magazine in question is Probe News Magazine which is a widely published and reputated magazine. They publish their magazine articles online as well from which you can clearly see that the magazine is not some online tabloid Recurring dreams made it out to be. Also their is nothing libelous or dubious about a plain and simple arrest that was made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapedkrusader (talk • contribs) 14:03, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
OK, here's the article in question: [1].
Recurring dreams 13:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
What is the matter with this Ragib? How am i violating anything by putting up a picture. I put up the picture twice last month and you removed. You even went as far as blocking my IP address on wikipedia. What is this bullshit? I clearly have every right to put up a picture. And you have no right to block my IP address for that cz i clearly haven't violated any wikipedia policies by putting by the picture of Sajeeb Wazed. Please give me elaborate reasons why u blocked my IP address for such a long time?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazaan (talk • contribs) 13:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Mr Ragib is acting like an agent of Mr. Wazed Jr. Virtually everything in the version he has semi-protected against all corrections is without any valid source. Irrelevant topics such as the Awami win in the election has been highlighted. Broken links have been given to an unknown organization called Suchinta, and two unknown persons in charge of it. In fact, the promotion of this insignificant organization seems to be the main motivation behind this article. Negative aspects of Wazed Jr.'s activities widely available on the web, including multiple published sources, are being suppressed by design. This article weakens wikipedia's role as a reliable source of important information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.112.196.90 (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Penfding changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 23:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC).
Baal-Chera.
Talkmarani.27.131.12.12 (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Sajeebwazed.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Sajeebwazed.jpeg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC) |
Someone should really take care of this page. His net worth figure has to be a joke. Also, why exactly is there a neutrality tag? Except for a bit of sentimental rubbish on his nickname, I can't see a reason for a tag on the top of the article.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
This Net worth US$ 1 billion[1][2][3] should be deleted. The references are not from such source which could be accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushantaa (talk • contribs) 09:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Net Worth: US 1 billion <ref>https://www.pinterest.com/pin/294422894361418111/<ref> - 166.48.92.200 (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This Net worth US$ 1 billion[1][2][3] should be replaced with actual or removed. The sources mentioned are not acceptable sources. 2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Sajeeb Wazed imposed so called digital number plates (made of cheap tin without anything electronic/digital) for cars in Bangladesh with help of his mother Sheikh Hasina to earn illegal commission from a US company who are collecting charges from vehicle owners in Bangladesh even after four years of installation. Bangladesh government charged 50 USD for those cheap number plates and suddenly after four years they are collecting 15 USD more illegally mentioning that the price of number plates is increased after four years and they are collecting the balance money this year. After this scandal of number plates, Sajeeb Wazed is titled as "Digital Thief" in Bangladesh which should be mentioned at his bio I think. 2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdboy99 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Sajeeb Wazed imposed so called digital number plates (made of cheap tin without anything electronic/digital) for cars in Bangladesh with help of his mother Sheikh Hasina to earn illegal commission from a US company who are collecting charges from vehicle owners in Bangladesh even after four years of installation. Bangladesh government charged 50 USD for those cheap number plates and suddenly after four years they are collecting 15 USD more illegally mentioning that the price of number plates is increased after four years and they are collecting the balance money this year. After this scandal of number plates, Sajeeb Wazed is titled as "Digital Thief" in Bangladesh which should be mentioned at his bio I think. 2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdboy99 (talk • contribs) 08:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2001:E68:64C1:DE00:65A4:63D0:2085:39F1 (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
j[yhlx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.63.159.6 (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
I added a "dubious" tag to the following sentence:
In 2010, the pro-Bangladesh Nationalist Party newspaper, Amar Desh leaked documents claiming Wazed took $2 million from Chevron in exchange for allowing the multinational energy corporation to install a gas compressor.
Although there are two footnotes, one goes to a non-English source. While there is no requirement that sources be in English, I don't see that the source has any content. Given my nonexistent Bengali abilities, I hope someone else will corroborate or correct me if I'm wrong. The second footnote goes to an empty page.
A strong claim such as this deserves strong sourcing, which should either be supplied or the claim should be removed.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:34, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I found a source from which i could add some info to this page. I need some help in verifying this "source". http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1060321 From what i read there, some of the info looks kinda legit. There are also some infos mentioned there about the biography of Sajib Wazed Joy that isn't mentioned in the wikipedia page. I'd appreciate any help given to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkSpartan (talk • contribs) 14:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In ((infobox_person)), |relatives=
and |relations=
are aliases for each other. The Sajeeb Wazed article uses both and so they conflict with each other. |relations=
is the second one listed so that is displayed, overriding the value in |relatives=
.
In the infobox, please change |relations=See
to [[Sheikh–Wazed family]]
|family=See
. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 15:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
[[Sheikh–Wazed family]]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
((infobox_person#Inline_lists)) says: "Do not use <br />
markup to create fake lists, as in: Item one<br />item two<br />item three
."
In ((infobox_person)) for Sajeeb Wazed, please change:
| alma_mater = [[Bangalore University]] <br /> [[The University of Texas at Arlington]] <br /> [[Harvard University]]
to:
| alma_mater = ((ubl | [[Bangalore University]] | [[The University of Texas at Arlington]] | [[Harvard University]] ))
and change:
| education = BSc (Computer Engineering) <br /> MA (Public Administration)
to:
| education = ((ubl | BSc (Computer Engineering) | MA (Public Administration) ))
and change:
| parents = [[M. A. Wazed Miah|Dr M A Wazed Miah]] <br /> [[Sheikh Hasina]]
to:
| parents = ((ubl | [[M. A. Wazed Miah|Dr M A Wazed Miah]] | [[Sheikh Hasina]] ))
– 108.56.139.120 (talk) 15:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The whole leadership section reads like a promotion without any sourcing. A cursory google search reveals that this is an individual with numerous corruption charges pending. 45.120.115.229 (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''
(talk|contribs) 11:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Leadership section is glaring and lacking proper citations.
Suggestion to make a minor improvement by removing the Non-Neutral Wording / Peacock Language; specifically removing the following sentence from the section: Using his mother's position and his own personal reputation among party leaders, he could easily have opted for a top position in the party. However, his humility, willing to learn from the bottom and leadership traits did not allow him to do that.
Further, it is entirely unsubstantiated and irrelevant to the article, which should be factual and not an advertisement. ZeroSaiin (talk) 12:25, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Why is there no mention of why he has two names? 207.96.32.81 (talk) 11:43, 6 August 2024 (UTC)