Siddhantasara has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 22, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Gazal world (talk). Self-nominated at 11:48, 22 July 2020 (UTC).
A fact from Siddhantasara appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@Gog the Mild: Hi Gog. After long time. Hope, you are doing well. I just finished my work on this article (as always, its a book by Manilal Dwivedi). Before I publish it, it would be appreciative if you can do copy-editing. Feel free to remove unnecessary details and modify article structure. As per your convenience. There are no any urgency. Thanks. --Gazal world (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 22:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and come what may from this review, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. During the review, I may make copyedits, which I will limit to spelling correction and minor changes to punctuation (removal of double spaces and such). I will only make substantive edits that change the flow and structure of the prose if I previously suggested and it is necessary. The Nominator(s) should understand that I am a grammar pedant, and I will nitpick in the interest of prose quality. For responding to my comments, please use Done, Fixed, Added, Not done, Doing..., or Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 22:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
based on the science of mesmerismto "pseudoscience", or delete it altogether.
Manilal's theological conclusions are that Āryāvarta is the source of all religions; [...]Could you add a few words to clarify that Āryāvarta refers to a historic region of the Indian subcontinent?
Images are relevant and free/tagged. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 22:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Article passes copyvio scanners with a mere 5.7% likelihood. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 22:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Article is stable, with no major edits in months. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 22:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|