Battle of Tokmak was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 April 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Southern Ukraine campaign. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Should "Kherson offensive" be capitalized as a proper noun? ("Kherson Offensive")
I believe "Kherson offensive" would refer to a proper noun, as it is the name of a current military offensive. Kiev Offensive is capitalized as such, as well as the concurrent Kyiv Offensive (2022). QuaintCable (talk) 09:10, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Explicit list of battles in the Kherson offensive
There are currently 3 pages for battles in this offensive (Kherson, Melitopol, and Mykolaiv) and it will probably will increase with the siege of Berdiansky and the advance on the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant.
I followed the pattern from Feb 26, with a see also for the battle that started that day, but maybe there should be an explicit list of all of the battles from this offensive, instead of having them floating around the text. RGoes (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This should be linked to from the main ukraine 2022 invasion page..
Just saw this by chance, very good.... It is not linked in "related articles" section on bottom of Ukraine 2022 invasion page: (Also the sub-invasion links should surely be at the top of that page really, if there is someone reading this doing both pages...). 188.65.190.67 (talk) 16:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is linked to the main page through the “2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine” template at the bottom of all of the related pages. Elijahandskip (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A battle, aka the Battle of Kherson is just the battle for the city named Kherson. The offensive article is the name for the entire large offensive from the Crimea side. I am actually about to start a discussion to rename this offensive article. Elijahandskip (talk) 06:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Kherson offensive → Crimea offensive – The offensive started out appearing the main goal was Kherson, but looking at the map, the Russian forces have gone in three different directions (West toward Kherson, North toward Zaporizhzhia and East toward Mariupol), so I believe this should be renamed to the "Crimea offensive". All three parts of this offensive were launched from Crimea, so it seems like a perfect name choice. Elijahandskip (talk) 06:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The offensive isn’t in Crimea, and the proposal is confusable with the 2014 Crimea invasion and annexation. It started into and has been mainly in Kherson oblast. Maybe southern offensive might be suitable name, but either way needs some evidence about the name used in sources. —MichaelZ. 07:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: No source uses such a name and it's far more than about Crimea. However I think "Southern Ukraine offensive" would a better name as it does not strictly concern Kherson Oblast. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 07:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing as I need to redo this with sources and a different name. Elijahandskip (talk) 07:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Splitting proposal - Kherson offensive and Zaporizhzhia offensive
According to the ABC News article, "Melitopol, a city in the Zaporizhzhia region", meaning the Battle of Melitopol would be considered part of the offensive. That would also mean the Siege of Enerhodar and Battle of Zaporizhzhia articles would be split into the new "Zaporizhzhia offensive" article.
That would leave Battle of Mykolaiv & Battle of Kherson in the "Kherson offensive" article. We would have to decide where to put the Battle of Berdiansk. But sources are indicating a new offensive region, so it is time to split the battles into their correct offensive articles. Elijahandskip (talk) 07:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The reason they refer to specific regions because they're simply talking about the situation in them. No sources say there is a new offensive anywhere. WP:OR. I don't see any point in splitting it. And let's not create a logistical difficulty by orphaning Berdiansk. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 08:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Addition: It also appears that the offensive in the south appears to be part of cutting off Ukraine entirely from the Black Sea. [1] Also reliable sources refer to the south as part of one theater. I think this should be changed to "Southern Ukraine offensive". [2]AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 09:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see your WP:OR claim. No sources directly say “Zaporizhzhia offensive”, but as far as I can tell, no sources talk about the Siege of Enerhodar and Battle of Zaporizhzhia, or Battle of Berdiansk as the “Kherson offensive” or “Kherson region”. Multiple RS refer to the “Zaporizhzhia region” in reference to those battles, so clearly, it isn’t the same offensive, otherwise, RS would straight up say it is the same offensive or same region.
In addition to that, the source for the lead[3] does not say “Kherson offensive”, but it says “Kherson region”, so any WP:OR argument on the name change would have to also state that this article was created on WP:OR. Elijahandskip (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A source simply mentioning a region doesn't make it a separate offensive. That is WP:OR because offensives can take place in multiple areas. Besides try looking at the Battle of Melitopol. It began right on the first day of invasion and they travelled there from Crimea [4]. The city is in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, so they have to go through Kherson Oblast. You can see the date - 24 February. The operations are part of one single offensive.
I agree that they aren't mentioned as part of "Kherson offensive", but they are mentioned as part of Russia's offensive in the south like Berdiansk [5]. The Washington Post particularly states Russia opened a three front campaign- north, south, east [6]. So I suggest renaming this as "Southern Ukraine offensive" like we have an Eastern Ukraine offensive. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 09:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but support renaming to "Southern Ukraine offensive." I think that will resolve most potential confusion and the localized conflicts should be covered in their respective articles anyways. ErieSwiftByrd (talk) 07:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose at this time. It's possible that the Southern Offensive might split into two east/west offensives. But not yet. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn I forgot to withdraw this after the rename took place. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Requested move 3 March 2022
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Kherson offensive → Southern Ukraine offensive – Per AbsolutelyFiring, this offensive is taking place in multiple regions/parts of Ukraine aside from Kherson so the present title is inaccurate. "Southern Ukraine offensive" is more accurate and still understandable, and consistent with other pages (e.g. Eastern Ukraine offensive). DantheAnimator 01:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: As already stated above Russia has or at least seems to have a single goal in attacking Ukraine on the south per reliable sources - cut it off from the sea. And multiple sources call the attacks in the south as part of one single offensive or axis of the campaign. AbsolutelyFiring (talk) 05:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support For reasons stated above. If this achieves consensus, I think we do not need split this article into Kherson offensive and Zaporizhzhia offensive. --Paninigenie (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support As stated above, the offensive is more far-reaching and this would be more consistent with the other areas. Kosack (talk) 09:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy support as per the above section where I suggested it lol. Should be done asap. Curbon7 (talk) 01:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per statements above. It's a better title. The axis in the south seems to be about more than just the capture of Kherson. RopeTricks (talk) 07:07, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per the statement by AbsolutelyFiring.Thespearthrower (talk) 23:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support For reasons stated above by AbsolutelyFiring. Jibreel23 (talk) 03:01, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support For reasons stated above. Ahendra (talk) 03:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better title encompassing all offesives in south. Will be do away with confusion in naming and continued expansion.- Nizil (talk) 06:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. More flexible wording to accommodate current and future activities. - Featous (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a frontline offensive in Southern Ukraine. Felicia(talk) 02:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support: This offensive clearly has more objectives than just Kherson Spaceman2288 (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2022
This edit request to Kherson offensive has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please change "Russian forced had captured..." to "Russian forces had captured". Thanks. 2A02:AB04:2AB:700:CD6:4FDB:A01A:875A (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you for pointing it. Ridanbp (talk) 20:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change the map back from the colorblind one 72.229.242.36 (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done Happy Editing--IAmChaos 17:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"All of Kherson Oblast is under Russian control."
Is not true. As of 14 April 2022, most of the Kherson Oblast is under Russian control, but not all. 82.43.220.16 (talk) 01:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That has been updated now. Nurg (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Moved to here: “
Prior to 8 March, a Russian detachment made its way northwest along the east bank of the Southern Bug river. However, according to the Institute for the Study of War, it is likely that Ukrainian forces have halted this advance because Russian forces are facing growing supply and morale issues.[1] ” Elinruby (talk) 05:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What are the expected scopes of this article, Southern Ukraine offensive, versus 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive? The current risk is of people redundantly adding material to both. Boud (talk) 13:46, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The scope of the counteroffensive is basically the reverse of the Southern Ukraine offensive. Russian troops enter Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts in the Southern Ukraine off. article, Ukrainian troops look to fully take back those same Oblasts in the 2022 Ukraine summer counteroff. article. PilotSheng (talk) 18:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose President Zelenskyy announced the beginning. This is pretty major. I think it's easy to see why. Dawsongfg (talk) 00:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PilotSheng: I see that 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive was created just yesterday. My guess is that 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive is seen as more or less a sub-article of Southern Ukraine offensive, even though the title 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive is not restricted the southern region only. The non-restrictive title is probably not a problem, at least for the moment, since there doesn't seem to be ambiguity. There have been no announcements of a major Ukrainian Donbas counteroffensive being planned soon, as far as I know. Boud (talk) 13:56, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Boud The 2022 counteroffensive article is not a sub-article of this article. Russian troops are no longer on the "offensive." I do think that the minor Ukrainian counterattacks from March to early July should be a subsection of this article, but the latest order from Zelenskyy is to reclaim all of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts, with which the Ukrainian defense minister claims they have 1,000,000 men to do. This would be a larger scale operation than the Southern Ukraine Offensive itself, and really as such should belong in its own article rather than a subsection of this article. PilotSheng (talk) 18:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see that Southern Ukraine offensive refers to the invasion by Russian forces, while 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive refers to Ukrainian forces retaking control of Ukrainian territory. So it would seem to me to make more sense to add material on the counteroffensive to 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive rather than extend the section in this article. Boud (talk) 14:11, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Hundred Days Offensive was a much larger operation than the German Spring offensive in terms of firepower, as were Operation Uranus & Mars superior to the 1942 German Stalingrad offensive in terms of morale, manpower, and firepower.
According to the infobox, Russia used 13,000 troops for the Southern Ukraine offensive. Ukraine claims they have 1,000,000 troops in Southern Ukraine ready to take back the occupied territory. Since the 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive is much larger in terms of manpower, firepower, morale, and perhaps even scope, the two articles need to remain separate.PilotSheng (talk) 18:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well this changes, there's less than that as you can see. Though we still don't know how much. Dawsongfg (talk) 00:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have done a search of news sources (there being largely no other sources for us to rely on) and there were no hits for "Ukraine summer counteroffensive". The title appears to be a WP construct and not a term used in reliable sources. When I search on ukraine "summer counteroffensive", there are 825 hits, most of which say: Ukraine plans on summer counteroffensive to oust ... and search result pages like this one actually have no mention of a summer counteroffensive. When I limit the time to the last month, I get one hit with the same line: Ukraine plans on summer counteroffensive to oust ... The Aljazeera report of 30 June which is the hit states: Ukraine plans on summer counteroffensive to oust Russian forces [headline]: Ukraine is making tactical retreats before a Russian onslaught in the east, saying it is biding its time to take back its territory in the second half of the year. The article 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive, appears to be based on WP:OR; it is an unnecessary WP:CFORK; that it might happen falls to WP:NOTACRYSTALBALL. It probably satisfies WP:SPEEDY (WP:A11). It should (IMO) be deleted and any content merged with other articles if not already done. Cinderella157 (talk) 01:59, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Cinderella157 here. Although there surely are enough sources speculating about a possible huge Ukrainian counteroffensive, mostly by late August. The article could be saved if its scope is changed. SuperΨDro 07:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Dromaeosaurus @Cinderella157 Agreed, I think we should probably move the article to draftspace until the counteroffensive becomes less speculative and concrete. PilotSheng (talk) 16:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment According to my own investigation of sources, there is very little evidence that such a large offensive has begun that far. The article merely lists announcements of the Ukraine and the fact they took the village that, according to my sources, already was empty. Considering how many times the Ukraine has lied about its achievements and the ongoing situation (entering Kherson already, and probably not even once, refusing to accept the loss of cities such as Lisichansk until the whole world shoves their nose in the facts, simply ceasing to mention the villages once Russia captures them as if there wasn't such "a problem", etc., etc. etc.), I guess this article only matters as a kind of section "possible counteroffensive" here. Otherwise, it's clearly WP:NOTACRYSTALBALL: spreading rumours and wishful thinkings instead of even largely biased, but existing sources we can point at. --M1911 (talk) 10:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.
Support for Southern Ukraine campaign - When this article was created, it only covered the initial Russian offensive. By now, several military offensives and battles have taken place in southern Ukraine, meaning that it is much more accurate to describe it as a military campaign, not just an offensive. Applodion (talk) 16:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Russian forces from Crimea split into two to attack Kherson and Mykolaiv at the west and Melitopol and Mariupol at the east. Currently, operations at the line of contact near Zaporizhzhia and in Kherson Oblast are different. SuperΨDro 20:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Campaign Well, according to my dictionary, a campaign is a series of operations, and an offensive is a campaign in the attack. But Russian forces’ southern offensive towards Mykolaiv and Odesa was actually thwarted and ended months ago. Ukraine started its 2022 Ukrainian southern counteroffensive at the end of August, and the Russians are digging in for the defence, and being forced to withdraw in some areas, so this is can no longer be considered a single offensive. (We should consider a broader name for this series of campaigns, like Southern Ukraine area of operations or Southern Ukraine theatre.) —MichaelZ. 14:13, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]