This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 03:52, July 3, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
File:Ida 1958 track.png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]
The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
File:Ida 1958 track.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:IDA EYE.JPG has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Ida pressure drop.png has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
Hmm, my edition of Longshore, 1998 refers to Ida as the "Kanagawa typhoon" while the Time article calls it the "Kanogawa typhoon", so I'm confused about which to trust. HurricaneFan2516:57, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll probably do finish this review by 23:00 UTC, but I might not have the time to do so. There's a bit of info from Longshore, 1998 that I might add to the article. I'm consulting it for this GA review. HurricaneFan2516:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On September 22 Ida turned to the north A comma is needed here, right after "22". On September 22, Ida turned to the north
It became extratropical the next day Link extratropical to extratropical cyclone as not everyone knows what they are.
No pre-tropical cyclonegenesis in the MH?
However, over a 14 hour period Use a hyphen, not a non-breaking space. However, over a 14-hour period
Link UTC the first time you use it, not the second time you use it.
and at about 0500 "at about" sound strange. Reword it to something like and near 0500
The winds gradually decreased → Ida's winds gradually decreased
the Kano River flooding destroyed two villages along the Izu Peninsula Reword to the flooding of the Kano River destroyed to villages along the Izu Peninsula for clarity.
the landslides and flooding occurred in populated areas Remove this; it's pretty obvious given what you said right before that.
Publishers in the prose should be italicized. (e.g. A report by Time magazine)
520,000 homes were flooded, which is the most on record The most on record for where? The prefecture? Japan? Internationally?
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose the nominator's argument does not consider the other versions of Ida in the Western Pacific. This isn't even the most deadly version of Ida. That honor goes to the 1945 typhoon that killed 2K in Japan, which literally makes that version more deadly - a key part of the nominator's rationale. YEPacificHurricane04:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above. I would also not use that list as a reason to move any storm. Please think about other storms before proposing another move.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 04:25, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.