A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 17, 2023. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please clarify this page. The discussion is about an Iraqi attack but the lead-in is about an Iranian attack. Iraqi or Iranian? (I believe the correct answer is Iraqi).
jwjensen356@sbcglobal.net
75.17.119.140 (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
It is stated that "Legally the American warship was allowed to attack any hostile aircraft within twenty miles". What is the legal basis for this claim? International law, US law, US rules of engagement (which have no legal authority) or Iraqi law?124.197.15.138 (talk) 23:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
The article states that the American warship was allowed to attack hostile aircraft. However the Iraqi forces were not considered hostile to America at the time of the incident. The attack occured during the context of the Iran-Iraq war. The Stark was not a combatant in that conflict. Her mission was to protect American-flagged ships, primarily oil tankers, from Iranian gunboats. See http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a051787ussstark. Iraq quickly apologized for the attack. As written, the article gives the false impression that Iraq was hostile to the US in 1987. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.89.77.22 (talk) 17:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hostile aircraft does not refer to any country's forces, but to the aircraft. Hostile is a category of identification, determined by the then ship's AIMS Mk XII (12) ATC-RBS, Identification, Friend or Foe system. It is doctrine based, on the aircraft's speed, direction, RF emissions, and other factors. The nationality of an hostile (or unknown) aircraft might be unknown; bliss(?). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.224.2 (talk) 23:46, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on USS Stark incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
The central part of this article, which is the description of the attack, is almost completely unsourced. This is always a problem, but even more so here because this is a WP:BLP issue regarding the still-living officers and crew of Stark. If anyone can point me to a good source, I can take a stab at a re-write. Kendall-K1 (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:Summary style level of detail re the missile attack incident needs balancing between the USS Stark (FFG-31) and the USS Stark incident articles, or perhaps the latter article should be merged into the former. Please discuss at Talk:USS Stark (FFG-31)#Need to balance detail. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
There is a discussion currently in progress which relates to this incident at Talk:USS Stark (FFG-31)#Removal of content re Dassault Falcon 50. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
This article states distances in (international) miles, but Naval forces and aircraft use nautical miles so which one is it? The convert template uses international miles. Avi8tor (talk) 07:59, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Why does the infobox for this article describe this incident as an "Iraqi victory?" The United States and Iraq were not in conflict at this time (and had never been previously), and this was apparently an unauthorized action taken by the Iraqi pilot, acting solely on his own initiative. If one treats this mistake as a "victory," then by the same logic the USS Liberty incident should be listed as an Israeli victory, and the shootdown of Iran Air Flight 655 should be called an American victory. Jrt989 (talk) 17:04, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
It has been proposed in this section that USS Stark incident be renamed and moved to Attack on the USS Stark. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use ((subst:requested move)) . Do not use ((requested move/dated)) directly. |
USS Stark incident → Attack on the USS Stark – (the proposed title was changed from USS Stark attack) – The ship was attacked, incident implies tension or threats. MountainDew20 (talk) 22:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)