This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. You can assist by editing it. (April 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Water tractor beam

A tractor beam is a device that can attract one object to another from a distance.[1] The concept originates in fiction: The term was coined by E. E. Smith (an update of his earlier "attractor beam") in his novel Spacehounds of IPC (1931). Since the 1990s, technology and research have labored to make it a reality, and have had some success on a microscopic level.[2] Less commonly, a similar beam that repels is known as a pressor beam or repulsor beam. Gravity impulse and gravity propulsion beams are traditionally areas of research from fringe physics that coincide with the concepts of tractor and repulsor beams.

Physics

A force field confined to a collimated beam with clean borders is one of the principal characteristics of tractor and repulsor beams.[3] Several theories that have predicted repulsive effects do not fall within the category of tractor and repulsor beams because of the absence of field collimation. For example, Robert L. Forward, Hughes Research Laboratories, Malibu, California, showed that general relativity theory allowed the generation of a very brief impulse of a gravity-like repulsive force along the axis of a helical torus containing accelerated condensed matter.[4][5]

The mainstream scientific community has accepted Forward's work. A variant of Burkhard Heim's theory by Walter Dröscher, Institut für Grenzgebiete der Wissenschaft (IGW), Innsbruck, Austria, and Jocham Häuser, University of Applied Sciences and CLE GmbH, Salzgitter, Germany, predicted a repulsive force field of gravitophotons could be produced by a ring rotating above a very strong magnetic field.[6] Heim’s theory, and its variants, have been treated by the mainstream scientific community as fringe physics. But the works by Forward, Dröscher, and Häuser could not be considered as a form of repulsor- or tractor-beam because the predicted impulses and field effects were not confined to a well-defined, collimated region.

The following is a summary of experiments and theories that resemble repulsor and tractor beam concepts:

1960s

In July 1960, Missiles and Rockets reported Martin N. Kaplan, Senior Research Engineer, Electronics Division, Ryan Aeronautical Company, San Diego, had conducted experiments that justified planning for a more comprehensive research program. The article indicated such a program, if successful, would yield either “restricted” or “general” results. It described the “restricted” results as an ability to direct an anti-gravitational force toward or away from a second body.[7]

In 1964, Copenhagen physicists, L. Halpern, Universitetets Institut for Teoretisk Fysik, and B. Laurent, Nordisk Institut for Teoretisk Atomfysik, indicated general relativity theory and quantum theory allowed the generation and amplification of gravitons in a manner like the LASER.[8] They showed, in principle, gravitational radiation in the form of a beam of gravitons could be generated and amplified by using induced, resonant emissions.

1990s

In 1992, Russian Professor of Chemistry, Yevgeny Podkletnov, and Nieminen, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, discovered weight fluctuations in objects above an electromagnetically levitated, massive, composite superconducting disk.[9] Three years later, Podkletnov reported the results of additional experiments with a toroidal disk superconductor.[10] They reported the weight of the samples would fluctuate between −2.5% and +5.4% as the angular speed of the superconductor increased. Certain combinations of disk angular speeds and electromagnetic frequencies caused the fluctuations to stabilize at a 0.3% reduction. The experiments with the toroidal disk yielded reductions that reached a maximum of 1.9–2.1%. Reports about both sets of experiments stated the weight loss region was cylindrical, extending vertically for at least three meters above the disk. Qualitative observations of an expulsive force at the border of the shielded zone were reported in the Fall of 1995.[11]

Italian physicist Giovanni Modanese, while a Von Humboldt Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Physics, made the first attempt to provide a theoretical explanation of Podkletnov's observations.[11][12] He argued the shielding effect and slight expulsive force at the border of the shielded zone could be explained in terms of induced changes in the local cosmological constant. Modanese described several effects regarding responses to modifications to the local cosmological constant within the superconductor.[13] Ning Wu, Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China, used the quantum gauge theory of gravity he had developed in 2001 to explain Podkletnov's observations.[14] Wu's theory approximated the relative gravity loss as 0.03% (an order of magnitude smaller than the reported range of 0.3 – 0.5%).

Several groups around the world tried to replicate Podkletnov's gravity shielding observations.[15]

C. S. Unnikrishan, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India, showed that if the effect had been caused by gravitational shielding, the shape of the shielded region would be similar to a shadow from the gravitational shield. For example, the shape of the shielded region above a disk would be conical. The height of the cone's apex above the disk would vary directly with the height of the shielding disk above the earth.[16] Podkeltnov and Nieminen described the shape of the weight loss region as a cylinder that extended through the ceiling above the cryostat.

2010s

A team of scientists at the Australian National University led by Professor Andrei Rode created a device similar to a tractor beam to move small particles 1.5 meters through the air.[17] Rather than create a new gravitational field, however, the device utilizes a doughnut-shaped Laguerre-Gaussian laser beam, which has a high-intensity ring of light that surrounds a dark core along the beam axis. This method confines particles to the center of the beam using photophoresis, whereby illuminated sections of the particle have a higher temperature and thus impart more momentum to air molecules incident on the surface. Owing to this method, such a device can't work in space due to lack of air. Still, Professor Rode states that there are practical applications for the device on Earth, for example, the transportation of microscopic hazardous materials and other microscopic objects.[18][19]

John Sinko and Clifford Schlecht researched a form of reversed-thrust laser propulsion as a macroscopic laser tractor beam. Intended applications include remotely manipulating space objects at distances up to about 100 km,[20] removal of space debris,[21] and retrieval of adrift astronauts or tools on-orbit.[22]

Functioning tractor beams based on solenoidal modes of light were demonstrated in 2010 by physicists at New York University.[23] The spiraling intensity distribution in these non-diffracting beams tends to trap illuminated objects and thus helps to overcome the radiation pressure that ordinarily would drive them down the optical axis. Orbital angular momentum transferred from the solenoid beam's helical wavefronts then drives the trapped objects upstream along the spiral. Both Bessel-beam and solenoidal tractor beams are being considered for applications in space exploration by NASA.[24]

In March 2011, Chinese scientists posited that a specific type of Bessel beam (a special kind of laser that does not diffract at the center) is capable of creating a pull-like effect on a given microscopic particle, forcing it toward the beam-source.[25][26] The underlining physics is the maximization of forward scattering via interference of the radiation multipoles. They show explicitly that the necessary condition to realize a negative (pulling) optical force is the simultaneous excitation of multipoles in the particle. If the total photon momentum projection along the propagation direction is small, attractive optical force is possible.[27] The Chinese scientists suggest this possibility may be implemented for optical micromanipulation.

In 2013, scientists at the Institute of Scientific Instruments (ISI) and the university of St Andrews succeeded in creating a tractor beam that pulls objects on a microscopic level.[28] The new study states that while this technique is new, it may have potential for bio-medical research. Professor Zemanek said: “The whole team have spent a number of years investigating various configurations of particles delivery by light. Dr. Brzobohaty said: “These methods are opening new opportunities for fundamental photonics as well as applications for life-sciences.” Dr Cizmar said: “Because of the similarities between optical and acoustic particle manipulation we anticipate that this concept will inspire exciting future studies in areas outside the field of photonics.”

Physicists from the Australian National University successfully built a reversible tractor beam, capable of transporting particles "one fifth of a millimetre in diameter a distance of up to 20 centimetres, around 100 times further than previous experiments." According to Professor Wieslaw Krolikowski, of the Research School of Physics and Engineering, “demonstration of a large scale laser beam like this is a kind of holy grail for laser physicists.”[29] The work was published in Nature in 2014.[30] In the same year, Dr. Horst Punzmann and his team at The Australian National University have developed a tractor beam that works on water, which could potentially be used to contain oil spills, control floating objects, or study the formation of rips on beaches.[31]

In 2015, a team of researchers have built the world's first sonic tractor beam that can lift and move objects using sound waves.[32] A DIY instructables to build your own toy acoustic tractor beam was made available.[33]

In 2016, Rice University scientists discovered that Tesla coils can generate force fields able to manipulate matter (process called teslaphoresis).[34]

In December 2016, researchers were able to manipulate the movement of bacterial cells using a tractor beam, thereby opening up the possibility that tractor beams could have future applications in biological sciences. [35]

In 2018, a research team from Tel-Aviv University led by Dr. Alon Bahabad experimentally demonstrated an optical analog of the famous Archimedes’ screw where the rotation of a helical-intensity laser beam is transferred to the axial motion of optically trapped micrometer-scale, airborne, carbon-based particles. With this optical screw, particles were easily conveyed with controlled velocity and direction, upstream or downstream of the optical flow, over half a centimeter.[36]

In 2019, researchers at the University of Washington used a tractor beam to assemble nanoscale materials in a process they describe as ‘photonic nanosoldering.’[37]

Fiction

This article may contain irrelevant references to popular culture. Please remove the content or add citations to reliable and independent sources. (January 2023)
illustration of man being abducted with a tractor beam

Science fiction movies and telecasts normally depict tractor and repulsor beams as audible, narrow rays of visible light covering a small target area. Tractor beams are most commonly used on spaceships and space stations. They are generally used in three ways:

  1. As a device for securing or retrieving cargo, passengers, shuttlecraft, etc. This is analogous to cranes on modern ships.
  2. As a device to harness objects that can then be used as impromptu weapons by the craft
  3. As a means of preventing an enemy from escaping, analogous to grappling hooks.

In the latter case, countermeasures can usually be employed against tractor beams. These may include pressor beams (a stronger pressor beam will counteract a weaker tractor beam) or plane shears aka shearing planes (a device to "cut" the tractor beam and render it ineffective). In some fictional realities, shields can block tractor beams, or the generators can be disabled by sending a large amount of energy back up the beam to its source.

Tractor beams and pressor beams can be used together as a weapon: by attracting one side of an enemy spaceship while repelling the other, one can create severely damaging shear effects in its hull. Another mode of destructive use of such beams is rapid alternating between pressing and pulling force in order to cause structural damage to the ship as well as inflicting lethal forces on its crew.

Two objects being brought together by a tractor beam are usually attracted toward their common center of gravity. This means that if a small spaceship applies a tractor beam to a large object such as a planet, the ship will be drawn toward the planet, rather than vice versa.[3]

In Star Trek, tractor beams are imagined to work by placing a target in the focus of a subspace/graviton interference pattern created by two beams from an emitter. When the beams are manipulated correctly the target is drawn along with the interference pattern. The target may be moved toward or away from the emitter by changing the polarity of the beams. The range of the beam affects the maximum mass that the emitter can move, and the emitter subjects its anchoring structure to significant force.[38]

Literature

Comics

Movies and television series

The Original Series used the tractor beam several times. In the first episode produced for the regular series, "The Corbomite Maneuver", the Enterprise was captured and towed by a tractor beam which they attempted to escape by shearing away at a 90 degree course. In "Space Seed", it was used to tow Khan Noonien Singh's ship, the SS Botany Bay. In "Tomorrow Is Yesterday", the Starship Enterprise attempts to capture Captain John Christopher's 20th century F-104 Starfighter jet, "Bluejay 4", using a tractor beam.

Games

See also

References

  1. ^ "Nasa examines 'tractor beams' for sample-gathering". BBC News. November 1, 2011. Archived from the original on April 16, 2018. Retrieved June 20, 2018.
  2. ^ "Star Trek style 'tractor beam' created by scientists". BBC. 25 January 2013. Archived from the original on 14 October 2014. Retrieved 1 October 2014.
  3. ^ a b "Tractor beam, a hypothetical device". Academic Kids. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
  4. ^ Forward, R. L.. (1961, September 11). Practical anti-gravity still far off. Missiles and Rockets, 9(11), 28–31, 35.
  5. ^ Forward, Robert L. (1963). "March. Guidelines to antigravity". American Journal of Physics. 31 (3): 166–170. Bibcode:1963AmJPh..31..166F. doi:10.1119/1.1969340.
  6. ^ Dröscher, W., & Häuser, J. (2004, July). Guidelines for a space propulsion device based on Heim's quantum theory (AIAA 2004–3700). Paper presented at the meeting of the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. This work was named the 2004 AIAA Best Paper by the AIAA Nuclear and Future Flight Technical Committee.
  7. ^ Force (1960). "July 11". Missiles and Rockets. 7 (2): 27.
  8. ^ Halpern, L.; Laurent, B. (1964). "Agosto. On the gravitational radiation of microscopic systems". Il Nuovo Cimento. XXXIII (3): 728–751. Bibcode:1964NCim...33..728H. doi:10.1007/bf02749891. S2CID 121980464.
  9. ^ Podkletnov, E.; Nieminen, R. (1992). "A possibility of gravitational force shielding by bulk YBa2Cu3O7-x superconductor". Physica C. 203 (3–4): 441–444. Bibcode:1992PhyC..203..441P. doi:10.1016/0921-4534(92)90055-H.
  10. ^ Podkletnov, E. E. (1995, January). Weak gravitational shielding properties of composite bulk YBa2Cu3O7-x superconductor below 70 K under e.m. field [Report MSU-chem 95]. Moscow, Russia: Moscow Chemical Scientific Research-Center. Also, LANL Physics Preprint Server, arXiv: cond-mat/9701074v3.
  11. ^ a b Modanese, G. (1997). Updating the theoretical analysis of the weak gravitational shielding experiments. Proceedings of the 1997 IAF Congress, nr. IAA-97-4.107.
  12. ^ Modanese, G (1996). "Theoretical analysis of a reported weak-gravitational-shielding effect". Europhysics Letters. 35 (6): 413–418. arXiv:hep-th/9505094. Bibcode:1996EL.....35..413M. doi:10.1209/epl/i1996-00129-8. S2CID 10365722.
  13. ^ Modanese, G (1996). "Role of a "local" cosmological constant in Euclidean quantum gravity". Physical Review D. 54 (8): 5002–5009. arXiv:hep-th/9601160. Bibcode:1996PhRvD..54.5002M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.54.5002. PMID 10021190. S2CID 17444342.
  14. ^ Wu, N (2004). "Gravitational shielding effects in gauge theory of gravity". Communications in Theoretical Physics. 41 (4): 567–572. arXiv:hep-th/0307225. Bibcode:2004CoTPh..41..567W. doi:10.1088/0253-6102/41/4/567. S2CID 119407101.
  15. ^ Allen, J. E. (2003). "Quest for novel force: a possible revolution in aerospace". Progress in Aerospace Sciences. 39 (1): 1–60. Bibcode:2003PrAeS..39....1A. doi:10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00049-0.
  16. ^ Unnikrishan, C. S. (1996). "Does a superconductor shield gravity?". Physica C. 266 (1): 133–137. Bibcode:1996PhyC..266..133U. doi:10.1016/0921-4534(96)00340-1.
  17. ^ Shvedov, Vladlen; A. V. Rode; Ya. V. Izdebskaya; A. S. Desyatnikov; W. Z. Krolikowski & Yu.S. Kivshar (10 September 2010). "Giant optical manipulation". Physical Review Letters. 105 (11): 118103. Bibcode:2010PhRvL.105k8103S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.118103. PMID 20867612.
  18. ^ Smart, Ashley (November 2010). "Optical manipulation of light – absorbing particles takes to the air". Physics Today. 63 (11): 13–14. Bibcode:2010PhT....63k..13S. doi:10.1063/1.3518265.
  19. ^ McDaniel, Tracie (September 9, 2010). "Aussie Scientists Have New "Pull" as Tractor Beam Goes the Distance". Daily Tech. Archived from the original on 2010-09-13. Retrieved 2010-09-09.
  20. ^ Sinko, John (September 17, 2010). "Laser Ablation Propulsion Tractor Beam System" (PDF). Journal of Propulsion and Power. Retrieved 2010-09-17.[permanent dead link]
  21. ^ Shane (September 17, 2010). "Laser Beams to Clean Up Space Junk". GoArticles.com. Retrieved 2010-09-17.[permanent dead link]
  22. ^ brian wang (17 October 2011). "Laser activated ablation propulsion could rescue astronauts and move space junk". Nextbigfuture.com. Archived from the original on 2013-08-21. Retrieved 17 September 2013.
  23. ^ Lee, Sang-Hyuk; Roichman, Yohai; Grier, David G. (2010). "Optical solenoid beams". Optics Express. 18 (7): 6988–93. Bibcode:2010OExpr..18.6988L. doi:10.1364/OE.18.006988. ISSN 1094-4087. PMID 20389718.
  24. ^ "Nasa examines 'tractor beams' for sample gathering". 1 November 2011. Archived from the original on 26 January 2013. Retrieved 2012-09-21.
  25. ^ Chris Gayomali (March 3, 2011). "Tractor Beam Lasers? Possible, Say Scientists". Time. Archived from the original on March 6, 2011. Retrieved 2011-03-04.
  26. ^ "How To Turn A Laser Into A Tractor Beam". The Physics arXiv Blog. MIT. 28 February 2011. Retrieved 2011-03-04.
  27. ^ Jun Chen; Jack Ng; Zhifang Lin; C. T. Chan (24 February 2011). "Backward Pulling Force from a Forward Propagating Beam". Nature Photonics. 5 (9): 531. arXiv:1102.4905. Bibcode:2011NaPho...5..531C. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.153.
  28. ^ "Star-Trek style tractor beam created by scientists". 25 January 2013. Archived from the original on 20 August 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
  29. ^ "Physicists build reversible tractor beam". 6 November 2014. Archived from the original on 7 July 2016. Retrieved 30 June 2016.
  30. ^ Shvedov, Vladlen; Davoyan, Arthur R.; Hnatovsky, Cyril; Engheta, Nader; Krolikowski, Wieslaw (1 November 2014). "A long-range polarization-controlled optical tractor beam". Nat Photonics. 8 (11): 846–850. Bibcode:2014NaPho...8..846S. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.242. hdl:1885/28791. S2CID 119769885 – via www.nature.com.
  31. ^ Punzmann, Horst; Francois, Nicolas; Xia, Hua; Falkovich, Gregory; Shats, Michael (2014). "Generation and reversal of surface flows by propagating waves". Nature Physics. 10 (9): 658–663. Bibcode:2014NatPh..10..658P. doi:10.1038/nphys3041. hdl:1885/18240. ISSN 1745-2473. S2CID 41538433.
  32. ^ Sonic tractor beam invented (w/ Video) Archived 2015-11-13 at the Wayback Machine published by Phys.org on October 27, 2015 (DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9661)
  33. ^ "Acoustic Tractor Beam". Instructables.com. Archived from the original on 2017-01-09. Retrieved 2017-01-19.
  34. ^ Lindsey R. Bornhoeft; Aida C. Castillo; Preston R. Smalley; Carter Kittrell; Dustin K. James; Bruce E. Brinson; Thomas R. Rybolt; Bruce R. Johnson; Tonya K. Cherukuri; Paul Cherukuri (2016). "Teslaphoresis of Carbon Nanotubes". ACS Nano. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b02313.
  35. ^ Diekmann, Robin; Wolfson, Deanna; Spahn, Christoph; Heilemann, Mike; Schüttpelz, Mark; Huser, Thomas (13 December 2016). "Nanoscopy of bacterial cells immobilized by holographic optical tweezers". Nature Communications. 7 (13711): 13711. Bibcode:2016NatCo...713711D. doi:10.1038/ncomms13711. PMC 5159804. PMID 27958271.
  36. ^ Hadad, Barak; Froim, Sahar; Nagar, Harel; Admon, Tamir; Eliezer, Yaniv; Roichman, Yael; Bahabad, Alon (2 May 2018). "Particle trapping and conveying using an optical Archimedes' screw". Optica. 5 (5): 551–556. arXiv:1706.10122. Bibcode:2018Optic...5..551H. doi:10.1364/OPTICA.5.000551. ISSN 2334-2536. S2CID 19488845.
  37. ^ "Light based 'Tractor Beam' assembles materials at the nanoscale". Science Daily. Retrieved 1 February 2023.
  38. ^ Startrek Reference Manual, Rick Sternbach and Michael Okuda, pages 89 – 90
  39. ^ Nowlan, P. F. (1962). Armageddon 2419 A. D. [pp. 37–41]. New York, NY: Ace Books, Inc.