Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sbucciami. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 17:39, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sbucciami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, 82.84.225.97!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Phuzion (talk) 16:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Excuse me, could you please explain me why was it rejected? I added sources, including books with a part about the song... Does it need more sources? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 17:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bardcore, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Schazjmd(talk) 16:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Now "Genius" appears not to be reliable? I mean, let's get straight to the point: I've written the musician has released some songs in old languages. I added two links certifying he actually has. What more is required? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A user-submitted unreviewed "bio" on genius is not a reliable source. The blog is not a reliable source. There appears to be no independent, reliable sources that give any significance to Khole, and no reason to mention him in the article. Stop trying to promote him on Wikipedia. Schazjmd(talk) 16:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I ain't promoting anyone, just adding an info about a musician who does a quite uncommon thing such as singing in those languages. Ah, I added an article from a newspaper mentioning him, that should be counting as reliable, doesn't it? Be please so kind as to revert your edit 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A brief mention is insufficient. That article name drops many Bardcore performers. There is no encyclopedic purpose to mentioning them all and no reason to single out Khole. Schazjmd(talk) 16:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of them sing in Middle Scots and Old French? 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you find an independent source that discusses Khole to the extent that your straitstimes ref discussed Yong, it might be worth mentioning. Schazjmd(talk) 16:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ye know what? Do as you want, tantu è predda lampadda i' lu pozzu, as we say around my native place. ;) 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mo-Do, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's from the Italian article 82.84.225.97 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
Please convert your external links to references. See WP:INTREFVE and WP:EXTERNAL for guidelines. At this point the draft is not properly verifiable without having to dig through external links.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
That's a bit better than last time, but we still need more and better sourcing, especially for the "Personnel" section, and more information about the creative process of the song (which should be easy to find).
Try taking a look at WP:SONGS to see how you can improve the draft as a whole.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poetica (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Destri (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello, I'm Shadow311. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) personon Erica De Matteis, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Shadow311 (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Connected (Stereo MC's song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 20:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for adding sources. BTW: You can link the article Rockol in the citation. Also, please add a "|access-date=" parameter? If the page goes 404, it helps locating it in an archive such as Wayback Machine – https://archive.org. You could add the Wayback Machine archive with "|archive-link=" and "archive-date=". BTW: Sometimes there is a problem with the archive-date being different from the archive link date. You if it is flagged as an error, derive the correct date from the archive-url. Thank again! Cheers ~~
You're welcome, and thanks for being kind! I appreciate that :) Cheers mate!
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:
No sources. External links are not considered but in this case none are reliable sources so not useful for references. See also the notability guidelines for songs.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wave Goodbye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wave Goodbye and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at '74–'75. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 16:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Like I Can. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 17:48, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Geardona were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The article needs more secondary sources to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quelli che benpensano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Look at that list, you have been told what you need to do, instead of complaining about it you should find (secondary, reliable and independent) sources. Doing that is way better for all of us. Geardona (talk to me?) 20:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Six months worth of reminders and warnings...I don't think they're interested in learning how to do it right. Schazjmd(talk) 20:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Poetica (song). Thanks! Drmies (talk) 17:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG at this point in time. Has issues with neutrality and sourcing as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sbucciami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
Does not appear to meet WP:NSONG in it's current state. Also has issues with neutrality.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waking Up (2018 song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, 82.84.225.97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Destri (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:
No change since last decline. Before resubmitting read WP:NSONG and improve the draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sbucciami and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Geardona was:
Rephrase stuff like “ and contains a very important message” to be more NPOV
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Poetica (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Gold (Spandau Ballet song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Spirito. Binksternet (talk) 17:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gothic rock. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks a lot, very kind! I appreciate that! :) Maybe, you would like to review my other articles: Waking Up and Wave Goodbye. Thank you! Have a nice day and happy editing to you too! 82.84.225.97 (talk) 16:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Every Day Should Be a Holiday, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A sangue freddo (song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.