This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Hello, Ubed junejo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hazrat khuwaja Muhammad zaman luari sharif, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type ((help me)) on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Phill24th (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Phill24th. Ubed junejo, thanks for creating Hazrat khuwaja Muhammad zaman luari sharif!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article Hazrat khuwaja Muhammad zaman luari sharif which you created needs help in the style it has been written in, you can also help Wikipedia by improving it. That is, after you read the Wikipedia guidelines I've posted on your talk page.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Phill24th (talk) 19:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Lots of thanks for improving the article. Yes I have added some inline citations.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Phill24th (talk) 12:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Ubed junejo (talk · contribs), I just wanted to let you know that you aren't doing a very good job with the citation style you're using. Referencing may look daunting, but it's easy enough to do. Here's a guide to getting started. References are important to validate your writing and inform the reader. Any editor can remove unreferenced material, and unsubstantiated articles may end up getting deleted, so when you add something to an article, it's advisable to also include a reference to say from where it came. If you need any assistance, let me know.
Two separate citations.<ref>
Citation text. </ref><ref>Citation text2. </ref>
((Reflist)) |
Two separate citations.[1][2]
|
((Citation)) • ((Cite web)) • ((Cite book)) • ((Cite news)) • ((Cite journal)) • Others • Examples |
Please use these methods in the future, thank you - Phill24th (talk) 13:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC).
I have done it the same way already. Are you talking about yesterday?--Ubed junejo (talk) 13:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
I have posted original text of sources and its English translation on your talk page. Kindly do it for me. Regards. --Ubed junejo (talk) 14:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC) If you give me your email address I can provide you with image of book with text of reference highlighted.--Ubed junejo (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
@Ubed junejo (talk · contribs) (for your question on my talk): You can name the source and use it multiple time over the article. For more information please see Footnotes: using a source more than once. Thank you. Phill24th (talk) 21:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Dear Phill24th: I am very much thankful to you for your guidance and help. I am greatly indebted to you. Regards--Ubed junejo (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
For the great job you did through your edits on Khawaja Muhammad Zaman of Luari, a very nice article. - Phill24th (talk). 15:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC) |
Yeah dear Phill24th, thank you very much for your appreciation. I hope I will be able to expand the article further. --Ubed junejo (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mike V • Talk 23:34, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Dear Mike V : The image that I used was NOT a copy right protected image. Yes it was taken from a website but was not the property of that website. This image of the shrine is a general depiction of sufis of Luwari and can be found on many covers of books in local languages and on several websites. The copy right law DOES NOT APPLY TO THIS IMAGE. I humbly request you to restore the image.--Ubed junejo (talk) 22:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Ubed junejo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 1139 in Norway, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:50, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
DearUser:Malik Shabazz: Did you visit the Talk page? The content included in the article does not deserve a new article. article is too short and its content should be included in article on Norwegian history. Regards --Ubed junejo (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Ubed junejo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Aayal Tunia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello Ubed junejo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Abad, Kandiaro Taluka, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 00:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello. My brother User:Malik Shabazz I am from the geographical region the article belongs to. A very small village of 1 few hundred population is not important to have an article dedicated to it. Does it make sense that I creat an article for my street for example? --Ubed junejo (talk) 00:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Yes thank you for guidance. But whatsoever, the topic is not worhty of inclusion and it fact. this way or that way bro.--Ubed junejo (talk) 01:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
I have also declined several WP:A1 deletions on Pakistan villages that clearly do not meet the criteria. Please familiarise yourself with the guideline. If you wish to pursue deletion then WP:AFD is the way to go but you should note that clearly defined inhabited settlements are generally kept irrespective of size or importance. TerriersFan (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Your addition to Sindh has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thomas.W talk 21:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for informing me. This material was previously deleted by somebody without mention of any reason(including copy right violation issue as well), so I found it suitable to restore it with some modification. If you think it is copyright violation, then it is okay. Thanks.--Ubed junejo (talk) 21:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello! You look like someone who might be interested in joining the Pakistan WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you help us :-) Mar4d (talk) 12:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC) |
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
Hello brother: are u sindhi please reply on my talk page please brother..--محمد مجیب (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi dear Ubed junejo,Aoa,I have created a Wikipedia meetup event to celebrate Wikipedia 15, and discuss about Wikipedia and Wikimedia foundation at Hyderabad Sindh, Pakistan.You are requested to coordinate me in organizing this event, all possible help and guidance is requested, Expecting positive and dignified role from you.You are invited to join physically for this event.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_15/Events/Hyderabad,_Sindh_Pakistan
Jogi 007 (talk) 06:12, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
--ubedjunejo (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Ubed junejo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 22:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Hello, Ubed junejo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Congrads on the promotion. More please. Ceoil (talk) 06:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Herbig–Haro object you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 22:01, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
The article Herbig–Haro object you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Herbig–Haro object for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HH 46/47 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 20:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Messier 87 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 18, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 18, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
The article HH 46/47 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HH 46/47 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
The article HH 46/47 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HH 46/47 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Messier 87 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 1, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 1, 2018.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Sindhi and astronomy
Thank you for quality articles around astronomy such as Messier 87 and Mensa (constellation), for Khawaja Muhammad Zaman of Luari, for improving articles such as Herbig–Haro object and Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, for peer reviews, - Ahmad, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
A year ago, you were recipient no. 2014 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Help improve the quality of the article Maureen Wroblewitz on B-Class articles. Thanks you. 113.160.130.156 (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AhmadLX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AhmadLX. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Earth certainly is an astronomical object. Not only has it been known to be a planet since antiquity, but it can also be seen quite clearly in astronomical photographs taken from vehicles on Mars and in deep space: see, for example, the Pale Blue Dot. -- The Anome (talk) 12:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
I had just reported user Snowsky Mountain on the vandalism page and was directed to make a report on ANI, but when I wanted to make a lengthy report there I just saw you and the others have pushed the work to its ultimate end!
It was refreshing and I felt a need to thank you!
Bessiar mamnoon! Shukran jazilan!
P. S. Also know that they had already received 2 separate warnings before but have deleted them from their talk page. Just in case you lack enough warnings. NetBSDuser (talk) 18:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
PPV that I used as a source is not good source. But WWE.com should have updated its information for Lesnar's weight. It's easy to see that he have lost weight recently. This is because he is going to fight on UFC with 265 pounds weight limit. But when it was said that Lesnar weighs 500 pounds? He clearly weighs now around 265 pounds. Zulrah —Preceding undated comment added 23:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
I did not invent it myself that Lesnar weighs now 265 pounds. That source which I used was a PPV event that was held recently, that you can check in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13gFK3y4aIc In about 8:50-9:00 Paul Heyman says Brock Lesnar weighs 265 pounds. But PPV event is not good source. Lesnar has lost weight recently for fighting in the UFC with 265 pounds weight limit. We need now to wait for wwe.com to update Lesnar's weight and then use it as a source for this new weight. Zulrah —Preceding undated comment added 03:38, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Mukhtar al-Thaqafi has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN process.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi
I am a Sunni from Pakistan and I added material to Yazid 1 after some research which you quite cunningly and silently removed under the pretext of copy paste from this and that. I have only 1 question, how much do you get paid by Yazid 1 and his father in this time and age? It must be quite a sum as you even removed clearly accepted facts of Husayn Ibn Ali's RA life for these two characters.
And yes I am a Sunni and please read Sunni books before using or removing such material. Infact I would also encourage you to read some Shia books as Bukhari uses Shia sources as well so not all Shia sources are wrong.~
I think its probably ok at this stage, given the article is clearly FAC standard and doesn't need heavy lifting, to tap regular reviewers for input. However, given your account has a relatively low edit count and two FAC noms to its name, for credibility sake you might get mileage and bank goodwill if you participated in a few reviews there yourself. Ceoil (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, For your kind information i only added Muhammad al-Tijani 's books. I think there is not any my point of view or my personal analysis on this. You warn me and that is your problem. I think you should more improve yourself and collect more information on this policy. Sharief123 (talk) 09:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you reverted my edits on the article Yazid I. I wanted to let you know that I started a discussion about the lead section of the article on the talk page. You can view it at Talk:Yazid I#Introduction/Lead Section. Feel free to contribute to the discussion to help improve the article. Snowsky Mountain (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I am new in wikipedia. So, I didn't add any pic. So please latest picture to page Syed Jawad Naqvi . I will be your greatness. Thanks. Ayoub444 (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I mean add pic to page Syed Jawad Naqvi.. Ayoub444 (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is to let you know that there is a discussion about your edits at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated reversions by "AhmadLX". Snowsky Mountain (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Re: [1] could we reinstate the edit using the existing ref? The source states that they are refering to the core as M87* which could become a relevant searche term. --mikeu talk 15:04, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
FYI please ((ping|Mu301)) to get my attention. --mikeu talk 15:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
-- ferret (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello AhmadLX, I hope you're doing well.
I'm sure you have noticed the recent attempts to editorialize articles and distorting facts by some Saudi ultra-nationalists to suit their narrative. In fact I have found out about your wikipedia account from their twitter page. Needless to say they're a bunch of extremists (calling other Arabs as non-Arabs or 'Arabized') and are using ethnic scientific-racism as if we're still living in the 19th century..
They're so petty in fact user ArabianWE have edited the Arabian Peninsula article just to make Saudi Arabia name come out first in the list of articles. You can check out his edits on his contributions page. Clearly an act of editorialized war.
I came to you because surely the moderators in Wikipedia can stop this and reverse the edits? If they're not stopped now they will expand on other articles and it will be an endless misinformation war. Clearly Wikipedia was not intended to be a place for that..
This is their twitter page where you were mentioned by the ultra-nationalists and they called you an "امصاري" which is a derogatory word:
External link: https://twitter.com/272l7/status/1115136167870115840
AlOtaibi-1 (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Fitna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yazid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the Mukhtar al-Thaqafi article has been scheduled as today's featured article for June 10, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 10, 2019.—Wehwalt (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the article "about a controversial revolutionary from Second Islamic Civil War"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the GA review of Unionskirche, Idstein. You asked what I mean by TFA day? Franz Kafka today's featured article, and I one of the proud contributors of the most successful TFA ever - but that was for the first round in 2013 when the Google doodle helped. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yazid I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
The article Yazid I you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yazid I for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Second Fitna has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Twofingered Typist, Thank you very much for the copy editing. Regards. AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯) 01:03, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, and first of all, thanks a lot for your recent work on early Muslim articles. Glad to see someone else producing high-quality content in this neglected area! I was thinking about nominating Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Ash'ath to FA, and would like to know whether you had any comments in advance, seeing as you probably know the period better than I do. Any feedback, or even better, edits, would be greatly appreciated. If you don't have time, no worries :) Constantine ✍ 13:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Second Fitna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Mecca (692), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Marj Rahit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
RE: your warning about my "addition to Siege of Mecca (692) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material".
The edit was from three months ago. I do a lot of editing and do not remember what this particular edit said. You've annihilated the wikipedia history of its so I can't check that. Any way I can find out what it was? this alleged copyright violation? --BoogaLouie (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Hey I am authorized to do the change on the page of Tony Cucolo from him. He wish his bio to be updated ! Thanks sv — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara Vermont (talk • contribs) 20:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;">'''[[User:AhmadLX|<font color="teal">''AhmadLX''</font>]]'''-[[User talk:AhmadLX|<font color="turquoise">'')¯\_(ツ)_/¯)''</font>]]</span>
: AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)to
<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;">'''[[User:AhmadLX|<i style="color:teal">AhmadLX</i>]]'''-[[User talk:AhmadLX|<i style="color:turquoise">)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)</i>]]</span>
: AhmadLX-)¯\_(ツ)_/¯)—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
The article Battle of Ayn al-Warda you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Ayn al-Warda for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Le Petit Chat -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
I have another question after going through the article again. The article mentioned part of the opposition against Yazid was due to the unprecendented nature of hereditary succession, but how about Hasan's succession of Ali that happened just a few decades before? Did that happen by shura, appointment, or? Could this part be clarified: "Ali's eldest son Hasan became caliph, " HaEr48 (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Karbala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mawal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Siege of Mecca (692) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
The article Siege of Mecca (692) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Siege of Mecca (692) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 17:22, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks AhmedLX, for reviewing my edit at Imam Husayn page. The material is not an OR and, was as per citation mentioned in the subject para above. However I shall reconsider if not looking proper.Md iet (talk) 16:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
".. the miracles..a major glory .. wishes of Allah, is .. recovery of.. Head ... Husain .. at .. Ashkelon, .. hidden by..tyrants(.) They tried to conceal.. Allah has promised to reveal(.) Allah wishes to hide it from the enemies..to show it to Awliya..(.) ... to relieve the heart of ‘Devotees’ of.. Husain, as Allah knew their … heartedness …(.)
...Commander.. Badr.. has discovered Raas al Imam al Husain in .. Mustansir’s period, and has taken it out from its hidden place(.)He.. built a Minbar for the Mashhad, at the place where this sacred Head lay buried(.) ......"
Hope this is fruitful.Md iet (talk) 14:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for September 21, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 21, 2019. Thanks!—Wehwalt (talk) 08:20, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your excellent contributions to (controversial) Caliphate-related articles in a neutral and stylish manner. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
For your continuous contributions to Islam-related articles. Keep up the good work! Alivardi (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Karbala you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sa.vakilian -- Sa.vakilian (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ahmad, I'm helping out on an article on Abū_al-Faraj_al-Iṣfahānī with quite complex references and footnotes. I think that separate 'references' and 'sources' (e.g. in the style of this article) would work better for it, but I'm not familiar with how to implement it (I usually stick to science articles where just referencing with cite_journal is pretty simple). Given your experience with articles using that sort of referencing, as well as arabic historical sources, would you be able to drop by and lend a hand? Thanks in advance for any assistance! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 09:43, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
@Evolution and evolvability: The referencing in the article in question is different from the one we normally use with books here. I don't know of standard reference formatting in Wikijournals. At Wikipedia, Sfn tags are used for books where multiple pages are to be cited and we provide full bibliographic data. For example:
Statement A.((sfn|Wellhausen|1975|p=85)) Statement B.((sfn|Wellhausen|1975|p=17))
==References==
((Reflist))
==Sources==
*((cite book|ref=harv|last=Wellhausen |first=Julius |year=1975 |title=The Religio-political Factions in Early Islam|translator1=Ostle, Robin|translator2=Walzer, Sofie |publisher=[[North-Holland Publishing Company]]|location=Amsterdam |url=https://books.google.de/books/about/The_Religio_political_Factions_in_Early.html?id=p7klNgAACAAJ |isbn=978-0720490053))
I have changed a couple citations there, but I don't know if the author or you will be happy with that. If the changes are unwanted, sure revert. If you want the footnotes to be presented in this format, I can change the formatting of a few more. Thanks. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 15:16, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Hope that helps. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 18:04, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your participation in the September 2019 GA Backlog drive. Your 2 reviews made a difference, as did your willingness to review particularly old nominations. The work of editors like you helped bring down the unreviewed backlog by over 35%. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:59, 16 October 2019 (UTC) |
The article Battle of Karbala you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Karbala for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sa.vakilian -- Sa.vakilian (talk) 04:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
This is to let you know that Second Fitna has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 7 November 2019. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 7, 2019. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 21:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
When I changed invisible to visible in the "Herbig-Haro Object" article, I'd made the same mistake as Cas Liber, in missing that the explanation lay in the later development of more sensitive instruments, and so forth, as you had already addressed during your work on making the article Featured-worthy.
I apologize, to you, for my own sloppy work, in that I should have caught this on the article's "Talk" page, before I'd committed to my own edit.
Kudos, to you, and keep up the excellent work. catsmoke (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
You might be interested in observing the featured article nomination of Marwan in the Indonesian Wikipedia, although I expect it to be passed in the coming days. Mimihitam (talk) 13:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello my friend. It took a while but Battles of Harura and Madhar has passed its GAN. I think we’re good to nominate for Good topic status. Would you do the honors? —Al Ameer (talk) 02:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present AhmadLX, Constantine and Al Ameer son with this barnstar jointly and severally, in recognition of the excellent job they have made of Second Fitna. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC) |
April–May 2020 GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on April 1, and will continue until the end of May. |
Harrias talk 06:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khawarij, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Nahrawan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 18:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Thank you for completing 7 reviews in the April–May 2020 GAN Backlog drive. Your work helped us to reduce the backlog by over 60%. Regards, Harrias talk 07:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
Two years! |
---|
Look at today's Main page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
October GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the October 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on October 1, and will continue until the end of the month. |
-- Eddie891 Talk Work 16:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
The article Battle of Nahrawan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Nahrawan for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 17:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Battle of Nahrawan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Nahrawan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 12:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Al Ameer son -- Al Ameer son (talk) 19:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, AhmadLX. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Yazid I at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Tdslk (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
@Tdslk: Thank you very much for the CE. Regards. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 10:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
The article Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Al Ameer son -- Al Ameer son (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
On 10 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr, the Zubayrid governor of Iraq during the Second Fitna (680–692), fought the Umayyad army at the Battle of Maskin almost alone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mus'ab ibn al-Zubayr), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
On 14 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abu Bilal Mirdas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kharijite leader Abu Bilal Mirdas defeated a 2,000-strong Umayyad army with his band of forty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abu Bilal Mirdas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Abu Bilal Mirdas), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, You have delete the article i wrote about the Umayyad dynasty. I hope there is a reason or a spelling mistake Historicalxz (talk) 03:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
On 25 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai is considered the greatest Sufi poet in the Sindhi language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
The Epic Barnstar | ||
Overdue recognition for the tremendous work you have done for coverage of the Early Islamic period. Special nod for bringing Yazid I, one of the most controversial caliphs, to Featured status. Keep up the excellent work! |
And let me know if and when you are ready to bring Mu'awiya I to the next level ;) Regards Al Ameer (talk) 02:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Peer review/Huaynaputina/archive1 § AhmadLX. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Uthman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ansar.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kharijites you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Kharijites you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kharijites for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Kharijites you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kharijites for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 14:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 26, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or for Featured Articles promoted recently from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)