This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
|
Hi. I've added the rollback flag to your account. PLease review WP:ROLLBACK and make sure you know when, and when not, to use the tool. Thanks for your hard working countering vandalism. Pedro : Chat 10:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I found seven reliable sources with significant coverage. Joe Chill (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
As you had participated in the original RfD for Template:$, you may be interested to know that the deletion has been overturned at deletion review because of a procedural problem, with the redirect being re-listed here.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Aiken drum/Archive 1 - Thanks for your participation and support in my recent successful RfA. Your confidence and trust in me is much appreciated. As a new admin I will try hard to keep from wading in too deep over the tops of my waders, nor shall I let the Buffalo intimidate me.--Mike Cline (talk) 09:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Sure; thanks for fixing the issue so promptly. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the so-called copyright notice from the Sony Pictures Home Entertainment article. I don't know who did that. King Shadeed 14:31, 21 March 2010.
Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I went back into the deletion log re. "Mandy Miller." Marone, what a mess. It was a bunch of semi-literate kiddie-wiki. If you have a legit entry you'd like to add, by all means feel free. I'll make sure the title isn't protected. Have a great weekend! PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Sonofagun, you are absolutely correct. The last bit I deleted was changed by that kid and I wound up blowing off a legit article. Doggone it. I'll fix it in a moment. NICE catch and thanks for bringing it to my attention. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:39, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Glad to help...but it looks as if there's a heck of a lot of copyrighted content going way back in the edit history. If you have a moment, you may want to reword pretty much all of it. See you! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
That Rottentomatoes site had me concerned...but it's in fact GFDL. I learn something new every day and I've used that site before for my own use. No wonder it hadn't been deleted prior to my mistake in blowing it off. I am SO glad you caught this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
RE: Wikipedia:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron/Newsletter/20100201/Feature I mentioned how important neutrality is, which I planned to do anyway, before it was put up for deletion. thanks for your comments. Okip 19:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
-FASTILYsock(TALK) 00:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Please review the deletion log of 8 April and in particular the deletion of PlaneShift article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_April_8 There is no reason in the world this article cannot stay on wikipedia. Thanks. --79.40.27.216 (talk) 15:01, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Whilst I agree with you that the Megan wright article is a CSD candidate, I would respectfully suggest that it is more a spam article than one about a real person. Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 20:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Is there a reason you are removing my CSD tag from this article besides it supposedly being properly sourced? Because the references given are unquestionably press releases (they identify themselves as such), and in any case make little or no mention of the article subject. --LP talk 21:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
This is inappropriate. Quit it. The bureaucrat hasn't closed an RfA in 4 years and isn't up to community norms. My support was a support whether or not the closing bureaucrat is smart enough to figure it out. -Atmoz (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Calmly, please. calmly. Atmoz version is correct in my view. Agree with Lurker. I've protected the wrong version. Perhaps we can discuss this at WT:RFA. Dlohcierekim 19:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism. The edit you reverted here was certainly not vandalism and you used rollback to continue an edit war. Please be more careful in the future or you'll find yourself without the tool. Regards, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 21:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
No. I brought the matter to the correct venue for discussion. And how we cannot "get on with our lives" one way or another is beyond me. I acted properly, doing what I thought was correct, and then presenting it for review. Dlohcierekim 23:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
I saw you wanted to be known at User:Aiken Drum. You could request that name at WP:USURP since it has no edits and hasn't been used in years. MBisanz talk 01:51, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey Aiken drum,
I saw your recent edits on Cinco de Mayo, and boy that IP was persistent! I just wanted to point something out to you, that you must have done unnoticed. See here
You reverted the vandalism... And replaced it with more!? I know it was by accident, I've done it loads of times ;)
I just thought I'd help out a fellow user by learning from my mistakes
Limideen 15:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks for your concerns about this article. I am trying to encourage undergraduate students studying accounting scholars as part of a course requirement to endeavour to construct related Wikipedia pages, if one does not already exist, based on the notability of the scholar. For many students, this is their first time around doing something like this. I will hope to clean the page up personally if not addressed by others over the next short while.
Dreadarthur (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
More specifically, thank you for your strong support. It really means a lot to me that you have confidence in me. I will strive to meet your expectations! Thanks! ceranthor 00:39, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
|
Hi. I noticed this comment you made, and totally agree - there should be more coverage of Manchester's buses. So I wrote this. I'd be interested to know what you think: with 21 reliable sources it's almost more notable than the 192! Alzarian16 (talk) 01:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Quite honestly, I have no idea... WhisperToMe (talk) 12:58, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 19:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Checkuser and oversighter selection. You probably should add your name to the "users supporting this view" to your own proposal. If you oppose it, then don't describe it! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 17:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Aiken drum - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.
I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.
Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.
Thank you! 7 15:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I could (presumably - I've not actually done anything an admin can do yet) remove rollback from you. However... there are other, CSS, ways to remove it. That way you'd keep the "rights", but it wouldn't clutter up your browser. Just a thought, and if you really do want rid of rollback let me know, and I'll perform my first administrative task on you ;-)
Cheers, TFOWR 17:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
TFOWR 21:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
What you left is still accusations of criminal behavior without a single reference, reliable or otherwise. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 22:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
User:Aiken drum has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)