This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adam Irigoyen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey Mirela! Thank you for all the typo help on Freed I think I typed that plot summery out in about and hour or two!
Anyway I thought I would respond to your comment. Like I said in my note I'm not going to change the spelling in the pages back to British English (because in the grand scheme of things it doesn't matter so much) however in the Fifty Shades of Grey page at least because the author is British it was decided a while back to write the whole page in British English, much like the original ebooks.
So it wasn't about which spelling is used more often. I had thought that the new Freed page should follow that precedent. DSQ (talk) 21:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Twisted (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
I know how you feel. All of this sourcing is so unnecessary after an episode airs. There was NEVER a problem in past seasons, and if there was, no one seemed to care enough to take action. Why now, I have no idea. Whoever this person is, they're taking it way too seriously. I, too, was confused and annoyed that we're not even able to set up tables before the show airs, even though what we put in them is sourced. Heck, the dances for the next week are up for an entire week with sources. But the dance order cannot be edited in a few hours before it's revealed live on TV? It makes no sense. I pray that this person finds another page to "monitor" before next week. It's just ridiculous that our efforts to keep the page up-to-date are being shot down at every turn. Some things do need a ton of sources, but a reality show? A few, sure, but not a thousand. Wilted Youth (talk) 02:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Callmemirela (talk) 02:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 19), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samba (dance). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Callmemirela, I've noticed your good work helping to keep this article in good shape. However, I feel I have to warn you that you're in danger of violating WP:3RR. With your three reversions to HarpBasedBand a little over an hour ago, you've used up the number of reversions you're allowed to make in a 24-hour period. Even upcoming edits removing some portion of another edit could be considered a violation. I realize that you're trying to keep unsourced material—and this was not only unsourced, but the second and third edits were almost certainly unknowable, since the running order is typically determined on the live show when there isn't a separate results show, as we witnessed this past Monday. However, removing unsourced material is not a valid exception to the three-reversion rule, so if there are edits over the next 24 hours that cause you concern, you'll have to let one of the other editors on the article undo the damage. I'd hate for you to be blocked while trying to protect against another user who deserves blocking more than you do. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
When you find an account that violates WP:CORPNAME in any way, the easier thing to do is to warn them with ((uw-coi-username)). That will place them in a category monitored by admins, and will get them blocked eventually. WP:RFC/NAME is for more subtle situations. Highly recommend Twinkle if you're going to be doing it often. Cheers! §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Haha, I don't know what drug or drugs had I been on, read my description for the "undo", I consistently thought that you had changed it from "its" to "it's", sorry. Freshness For Lettuce (talk) 02:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Callmemirela. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alfonso Ribeiro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cha-cha-cha. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Would you please translate the entry "pt:Críticas à Rede Globo" for the wiki-en? Thankfully. 177.182.54.27 (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm not sure of the reason behind the removal of the commented out categories. WP:TVUPCOMING states not to add the year in the header for the season (e.g. Season 3 (2015) or Season 6 (2014-15)), but nothing about the categories? (Which are, once more, commented out for convenience for next year.) AlexTheWhovian (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Please tell me how to delete my account permanently then. BT80 (talk) 04:53, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Callmemirela, following up on your questions. So, this page on Commons gives good instructions on how to search Flickr only for files that have the right license. There is also an upload tool that is fairly easy to use. Finding pictures of celebrities isn't always easy. The majority of our pictures of celebs are ones taken at public events by volunteers. You can also try to contact the person and get them to submit a photo under a free license, sometimes this works, and sometimes you will get a "no" or no response at all. But, if someone says yes, here are the instructions for them to use to declare their license: Commons:Email templates. Happy New Year! The Interior (Talk) 21:58, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Callmemirela, you're past 3RR on DWTS 19. Give it a rest for a while, and let others deal with this vandal. I don't want you to get blocked in the fallout, but it's going to happen if you don't watch your reverts. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brett Dier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fear Itself. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Callmemirela,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~KvnG 19:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
|
The article Brett Dier has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the ((prod blp)) tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
No offense, but you may wish to take your own advice. The word "like" can be one of 7 parts of speech depending on context. "like you do" in this song title is a prepositional phrase, thus "like" is a preposition, not a verb. –Chase (talk / contribs) 06:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.
In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:
You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)
Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.
(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One Big Happy (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
In past seasons, the "place" or "rank" has always reflected ties by counting a tie as taking as many places as there are people tied for that number. So if there's a two-way tie for second, the next place is fourth, not third. I think you'll find that you'll get a lot of people holding to this standard way of determining place.
I strongly recommend that if you believe your way is correct, that you make your case on the talk page. Otherwise, you're going to run afoul of 3RR, and I imagine you're getting close to that already if you're not already there. I'm bowing out of editing the article (except for additions) for the next 24 hours, because I don't want to cross the line. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Why are you insisting that the identity of the killer is in the Cast List section of Eye Candy, it's a huge spoiler and could be happily elsewhere in the page....just not required on the cast list. Not everyone internationally will have seen the show yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.164.120.250 (talk) 03:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi, now that the full protection is up, the IP's are back to their disruptive ways. Would you mind getting the ball rolling with pending changes? If you need something from me just holler. :) 16:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
I removed my request related to population in Germany.
But why you didn't add population in Israel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.50.111.125 (talk) 06:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
I didn't read the page history alas why the bracket got added. (A note: Please notify me on my talk page when you respond.) ️Thanks! TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 02:00, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Let me just explain myself.
Once again. Please message me at my talkpage if you have any other comments. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 04:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring?! You've got to be kidding me. I didn't break The three revert rule I did ONE edit and you didn't message me back when I messaged you orignally after I attempted to explain the first edit. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 04:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
"Official"? Hmm. This is the ONLY account I have here! I have never clean started or vanished usered. Also. The latest edit by was made a little over 28 hours since your first revert. TheGRVOfLightning (talk) 04:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
No one looking in the guest section is your opinion. Seeing as you're perfectly capable of adding the source within the template yourself, you don't need others to do it. The Guest section is there for a good reason - not just for good looks. —MelbourneStar☆talk 03:32, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Please stop changing week 1 to "safe" and the last week to "TBA". There was no elimination on week 1 and the last week is done and they are safe! I am changing it back every week explaining on summaries but you keep doing it. I know the votes count for next week but the right format is not the way you are putting it. IF they get eliminated next week what are you going to write on week 5 if you write on week 4 that they get eliminated? Eliminated twice or eliminated previous week? And if the way you are putting it is the right one, why on the main article of DWTS Season 20, we don't have "TBA" to all the couples on week 4? Please stop changing it! Thank you! TeamGale (talk) 06:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
For Yaacov Kaufman? really?E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:41, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't follow bread crumbs. No one's done anything to either in a week, so why should I? — Wyliepedia 03:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
The article List of Young & Hungry episodes was flagged only because of the copied text. This should no have been done as a simple removal of the text was needed as I did. Are you trying to get the article deleted???? helmboy 16:12, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm not trying to vandalize anything. Please don't block me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.55.157 (talk) 14:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Callmemirela, just wanted to let you know that I reverted your removal of the 7+8 column. Those columns are standard when an elimination is based on two weeks of scores, which is what the week 8 results show used this time. If you look back, you'll see an x+y column in every season going back several years—the last season not to have one was season 13.
If you strongly feel that it does not belong, I'm happy to discuss this with you further on the talk page, but I think it's definitely worthwhile to see the actual combined scores for both weeks, which they did display during the results show this past Tuesday. Thanks for your consideration. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Everytime, I add the new teaser on the marketing section of Scream Queens. it is removed? Why!? its on deadline, its airing on FOX, and I'm just confused.Vmars22 (talk) 21:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I used Bloody-Disgusting for the second time, I added it. Is it reliaable?Vmars22 (talk) 21:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Ah okay! I just added it again with FOX's website as a source. Vmars22 (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I love when I use FOX it gets removed! Vmars22 (talk) 21:44, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Okay, can you instead just add it? Maybe if you just re-added it Vmars22 (talk) 21:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC) what I had, it wouldn't be remove?
Thank you so much, I appreciate it, sorry if I seemed rude, hope your having a great day! :) Vmars22 (talk) 22:23, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Removed again, please talk to them. Vmars22 (talk) 19:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Cas Liber (submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.
Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) 17:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
hi mirela,
hi, i was just wanting to know how is you were able to locate the article Oetosyrus so soon after i had created it. I'm just curious that's all, hope i'm not intruding and everythings' well otherwise with yourself . Thanks! Whalestate (talk) 02:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thanks mirela, it was a great help Whalestate (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't want an edit war, there pointless and a waste of time. I don't see how those are opinions when they're in the official character descriptions. The show will be coming on MTV and those are the descriptions that MTV gave so I don't see how those are opinions. Like on the Red Band Society (U.S. Series) it has the title "leader" in their character description, someone can say well that's an opinion, but it's not because that's what the offcial people behind that series gave in the description for the character.
I can see if those weren't official character description and I was just making up my own, but I'm not, MTV gave those. DrewAllstar (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
What? Dude posting the actors name before the character is saying who is who and how is that copying and pasting when it's the official character descriptions! Those are everywhere from the articles, blogs, Scream wiki, MTV press release etc! It's not breaking the rules to post official character descriptions, Screen Rant didn't make those descriptions MTV did! How can someone break rules by posting the official character description. DrewAllstar (talk) 00:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
First of all don't treat me like I'm dumb by saying "don't you even read...". Its everywhere because it's the official character descriptions. That's like saying you can't post a link to an article because everyone is posting the link. No offense man, but how are you just gonna jump into the conversation out of the blue without knowing all the facts. DrewAllstar (talk) 01:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm not accusing you of anything, If the shoe fits, it fits. You're the one who's making things personal and are you trying to undermine me by saying you have "good intentions" on the wiki and "how many years" you've been on Wikipedia. So that's your approach now. There's a lot of bad users who say they have "good intentions" and have been on Wikipedia for "2 years" and more. You don't know me so don't tell me I have "bad intentions" for Wikipedia when I do not. I'm editing a page of a TV Series that's apart of a franchise that I'm a big fan of. It's funny how you wanna get personal and acting like you're above me when I use your "feeling threatened game" against you. I don't have time for this so it's whatever, I think it's established that you don't like me and the feelings mutual. So I rather leave the Scream TV Series page alone then stoop to your level. Don't write me back because that would be harassment because I told you to stop. I'm not wasting my time on this, I have more important things to do than get into a war with someone who acts all big and bad beyond a keyboard. DrewAllstar (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Re [1] an edit conflict where I wasn't careful enough checking intervening edits. Thanks for fixing it.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 23:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
In regard to this, I'm pretty certain it wasn't intentional. It happened to me once on that same page a long time ago because of the many edits it gets. I think it's to do with if you submit an edit and then someone else submits their edit at just about the same time, it causes that. Cheers! - Amaury (talk) 23:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)