This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
I checked the history due to past disruption at Talk:Cock and ball torture, and rolled back to before the IP started editing, which wiped out your edit request removal. Sorry about that. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Why 124.254.108.94 (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi Cannolis
You reverted my additions to page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nanga_Parbat&action=history with comment "WP:YOUTUBE is not considered RS, need another source for this". Do you find acceptable non-English sources? If yes, I can add plenty of them in Russian. For example "https://tech.onliner.by/2021/02/12/belorusskij-alpinist" But nevertheless, could you explain why YouTube is not good enough If it shows the truth?
Best wishes, Dmitry — Preceding unsigned comment added by AprilBSU (talk • contribs) 17:59, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
It's confirmed on a lot of other sites that Technoblade died the 30th. AtlasSweden (talk) 14:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know I've opened an AfD against my own article as you had seemed to have concerns about Ralph's notability in the past…I now do as well and wonder if you agree! If you have time feel free to contribute to the AfD. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 20:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
I think it's ridiculous and plain wrong that a fake hit-piece WSJ article about Elon Musk is apparently counted as credible source about the breakup of Sergey Brin and his ex wife. This is just some journalist writing up a story to generate clicks. EM and ex wife and people around SB are denying this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.221.200.121 (talk) 08:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Is Wikipedia a dictatorship now or something? 178.164.229.29 (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
If you can't it so please reply me yrr 103.249.239.63 (talk) 13:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, @Cannolis. I noticed that you have reverted my edits on the Bengal famine of 1943, on the grounds that my citations were not adequate. I looked back at my revisions in the edit history, and the citations removed were NOT my original citations. Somehow there seems to have been some strange glitch, and my citations were changed. I never put in a zoology citation for the Bengal famine page. I had cited a Guardian article and a Conversation article, and somehow that strange Zoology citation replaced my citation of The Conversation. As for the quote from Churchill, it is an authentic quote from The Guardian. Professor Penguino (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I triple dog dare you to do it. 172.78.185.201 (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I would like to add a notable person to a wiki page Pyro2sick (talk) 15:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure you didn't mean to do what you did on the Talk page. Can you revisit it? Jack Upland (talk) 06:33, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Hello. I wanted to correct the name of this article, but I realized that the article is locked. I noticed that there are many discussions on the discussion page.
I am not very familiar with the laws, but I know that if it is to be reformed, it should be solved in politics and the outside world. But here another big forgery has occurred. The tournament has been renamed to the Arabian Gulf since 2018. But one of the users has changed the name of all the first 23 courses to Arabian Gulf in an obvious fraud. I spent hours trying to find it. I looked at some of the articles on the Asian continent. The name change is not related to the previous articles.
According to the documents below, please return all the first 23 articles to the correct and previous name. Do this in the main article as well. And it should be noted that from 1970 to 2018 it was held under the name of the Gulf Nations Cup and from 2019 until now under the name of the Arab Gulf.
Hashim-afc - An obvious forgery has been done by them. The original name of the first 23 courses should be returned with the same name as held. thank you
for example:
AFC U-19 Championship renamed to AFC U-20 Asian Cup but:
Tournament Names
1959–2006: AFC Youth Championship - 2006 AFC Youth Championship
2008–2020: AFC U-19 Championship - 2008 AFC U-19 Championship
2023–Ongoing: AFC U-20 Asian Cup - 2023 AFC U-20 Asian Cup — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 12:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello.
Based on the logic and also the name of the articles that I said above, Changing the name of a competition is not retroactive. I have nothing to do with the 2019 and 2023 matches. But as you can see, the first to twenty-third courses were held under the name of the Golf Cup, not the Arabian Gulf. In 2018, the user renamed all old competitions to new ones. Do you agree that this is wrong?
Suppose FIFA changed the name of its competition. Should all old courses be changed to new names? Definitely not. (for example: fifa world cup rename to World Football championship). New articles will be created with the new official name and old articles will remain with the same old name. I can find dozens of similar routines on Wikipedia. I have shown one above about the Asian Youth Championships.
I have a request:
1- Articles from 1970 to 2018 should be returned to their original names. Changing the Arabian Gulf routes to them should also be removed.
1970 Gulf Cup of Nations to 2017 Gulf Cup of Nations
2- Template:Arabian Gulf Cup and Arabian Gulf Cup also be corrected (for 1970-2018).
I have nothing to do with the current name of the tournament. I mean the names that were wrongly manipulated by the user Hashim for articles from 1970 to 2018 due to ethnic prejudices.
Wikipedia rules do not change old names either:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFA_U-20_World_Cup#Results
1991 FIFA World Youth Championship - 2017 FIFA U-20 World Cup : 1977–2005: "FIFA World Youth Championship" 2007–present: "FIFA U-20 World Cup"
All old names remain because no user has changed them to their own favorite names. This should be done here as well.
In official sources, there is no such thing as the Arabian Gulf. But this should be pursued through legal and international law. I just want the articles from 1970 to 2018 to be returned to their original names, which were the Gulf Cup of Nations. Thankful — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 11:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
https://www.arabnews.com/node/2230446/middle-east
Arab Gulf Cup Football Federation was established in May 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 12:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello again. Please move this entire discussion section to the article's talk page. I am not familiar with the procedures. Let's see what others have to say. And I can find more resources. But I must say that if the name of this competition was Arabian Gulf from the beginning, its articles would have been written with that name from the beginning. In fact, the user of Hashim should find reliable sources for this transfer without discussion and investigation, that the competitions have been held since 1970 under the name of the Arabian Gulf. With respect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 16:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello . ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 13:55, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Persian_Gulf_by_Gamal_Abdel_Nasser.jpg
Persian Gulf in Gamal Abdel Nasser (greatest pan arabist) document.
https://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/ungegn/docs/23-gegn/wp/gegn23wp61.pdf
un statement about persian gulf
Only Persian Gulf not Gulf or Arabian Gulf. arabian gulf is Red Sea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 15:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/172677?ln=en
united nations subject use of the term persian gulf: to all nations and members
Use of the term "Persian Gulf" / prepared by Editorial Control. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 15:15, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I put the reasons and sources in the discussion page of the article. I have nothing more to say. I am waiting for the users who claim the title of the Arabian Gulf to provide their reasons and sources for the matches from 1970 to 2018. If they were unable to do so, I would expect all the articles to be returned to the correct names. And all the sublinks should be removed from the template and the main article. With respect and thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mexxsa (talk • contribs) 16:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
My edit where I add the Brazilian Isabel Cristina was marked as a test and therefore reverted. However, it is not a test, but an addition of content. I didn't understand the reason for the tag. 2804:389:B10A:FFC0:C8FD:8CC:9AC7:D3B2 (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Please do not leave threatening template messages on my talk page. Doing so indicates an unwillingness to edit Wikipedia in a collaborative manner. The article talk page is the place to discuss issues you have with edits and I have started a topic at Talk:Harrison, Arkansas. Thank you. 47.137.179.4 (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Your revisions on annexation of Goa are not according to the facts. Please read this: https://web.stanford.edu/group/tomzgroup/pmwiki/uploads/1074-1962-03-KS-b-RCW.pdf 2001:818:E924:D000:48C3:4C03:BDE9:47D6 (talk) 23:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Cannolis I noticed you were part of a discussion on the talk page of this article and it was decided not to mention nationality and leave the lead as "was an pehlwani wrestler and strongman in British India." Recently an editor has forced Indian as nationality into the article without reason [1] the neutral version is far more appropriate as the nationality is heavily disputed. This source for example states British India and later Pakistani as nationality [2] Another source which states "Indian and then Pakistani after partition" [3] I believe removing nationality as discussed earlier was the best thing I think protection may also needed to prevent these disputes. MahisoeoEk (talk) 09:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Thought that was significant for being the first time since World War 2 that taxes were extended. Jiff Li (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Hi, I posted an edit request earlier, can you please look into it because I'm applying for college and the incorrect principal name causes a lot of confusion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Joseph%27s_Higher_Secondary_School,_Baramulla Ahtisham94 (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Not to nitpick, but please use edit summaries all the time. For a second, I wasn't sure who the vandal was... Thanks for your work! BusterD (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
It's my opinion that AGF is for suckers. When you see test edits on talk pages like Help talk:Referencing for beginners I think you're safe to just revert as vandalism and warn the IP involved. Responding "not done" just fills up the archive needlessly. I appreciate you being active at Help talk:Referencing for beginners and simply reverting is a better use of your time. I see you're coming up on fifteen years as a Wikipedian, which is a hell of a thing. I can send you an invite in April if you like. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:27, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for all that you do! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 01:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |